[Analysis on the clinical pulmonary infection score on the detection of multidrug resistance organisms in lower respiratory tract in ventilated patients in intensive care unit].

Huan Liu
{"title":"[Analysis on the clinical pulmonary infection score on the detection of multidrug resistance organisms in lower respiratory tract in ventilated patients in intensive care unit].","authors":"Huan Liu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the characteristics of multidrug resistance (MDR) organisms from the lower respiratory tract in ventilated patients, and the constitution, detection time and mortality of the intensive care unit (ICU) patients with different clinical pulmonary infection scores (CPIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted. The clinical data of 72 cases with lower respiratory tract MDR on ventilation more than 48 hours were collected from April 2010 to December 2011. CPIS were calculated at the same time. Thirty-three patients with CPIS>6 were diagnosed as ventilation associated pneumonia (VAP), while 39 having CPIS ≤6 (non-VAP). The characteristics of MDR, the detection time and mortality of the patients were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first five MDR were Baumannii [49.5%(34/74)], Klebsiella pneumoniae [24.3%(18/74)], Escherichia coli [20.3%(15/74)], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [5.4%(4/74)] and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA, 4.1%(3/74)] in VAP group, while the first five were Escherichia coli [40.2%(37/92)], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [33.7%(31/92)], Klebsiella pneumoniae [13.1%(12/92)], Baumannii [8.7%(8/92)] and MRSA [4.3%(4/92)] in non-VAP group. There was no significant difference in average detection time between VAP group and non-VAP group (10.7±1.5 days vs. 9.4±1.8 days, P>0.05). The mortality rate in VAP group was significantly higher than that in non-VAP group (39.4% vs. 23.1%, P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different MDR may be detected in lower respiratory tracts no matter the ventilated patients having VAP or not, which influence the patients prognosis and should be monitored intensively. Antibiotics should be empirically prescribed and adjusted dynamically.</p>","PeriodicalId":23992,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue = Chinese critical care medicine = Zhongguo weizhongbing jijiuyixue","volume":"24 11","pages":"680-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue = Chinese critical care medicine = Zhongguo weizhongbing jijiuyixue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the characteristics of multidrug resistance (MDR) organisms from the lower respiratory tract in ventilated patients, and the constitution, detection time and mortality of the intensive care unit (ICU) patients with different clinical pulmonary infection scores (CPIS).

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted. The clinical data of 72 cases with lower respiratory tract MDR on ventilation more than 48 hours were collected from April 2010 to December 2011. CPIS were calculated at the same time. Thirty-three patients with CPIS>6 were diagnosed as ventilation associated pneumonia (VAP), while 39 having CPIS ≤6 (non-VAP). The characteristics of MDR, the detection time and mortality of the patients were compared between the two groups.

Results: The first five MDR were Baumannii [49.5%(34/74)], Klebsiella pneumoniae [24.3%(18/74)], Escherichia coli [20.3%(15/74)], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [5.4%(4/74)] and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA, 4.1%(3/74)] in VAP group, while the first five were Escherichia coli [40.2%(37/92)], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [33.7%(31/92)], Klebsiella pneumoniae [13.1%(12/92)], Baumannii [8.7%(8/92)] and MRSA [4.3%(4/92)] in non-VAP group. There was no significant difference in average detection time between VAP group and non-VAP group (10.7±1.5 days vs. 9.4±1.8 days, P>0.05). The mortality rate in VAP group was significantly higher than that in non-VAP group (39.4% vs. 23.1%, P<0.05).

Conclusions: Different MDR may be detected in lower respiratory tracts no matter the ventilated patients having VAP or not, which influence the patients prognosis and should be monitored intensively. Antibiotics should be empirically prescribed and adjusted dynamically.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[重症监护病房通气患者下呼吸道多药耐药菌检测临床肺部感染评分分析]。
目的:探讨通气患者下呼吸道多药耐药(MDR)菌的特点,以及不同临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)重症监护病房(ICU)患者的体质、检出时间和死亡率。方法:回顾性研究。收集2010年4月至2011年12月通气超过48 h的72例下呼吸道MDR患者的临床资料。同时计算cpi。CPIS>6的33例诊断为通气相关性肺炎(VAP), CPIS≤6(非VAP)的39例诊断为通气相关性肺炎。比较两组患者的耐多药特点、检测时间及病死率。结果:VAP组MDR前5位分别为鲍曼尼菌[49.5%(34/74)]、肺炎克雷伯菌[24.3%(18/74)]、大肠埃希菌[20.3%(15/74)]、铜绿假单胞菌[5.4%(4/74)]和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌[MRSA, 4.1%(3/74)],非VAP组MDR前5位分别为大肠埃希菌[40.2%(37/92)]、铜绿假单胞菌[33.7%(31/92)]、肺炎克雷伯菌[13.1%(12/92)]、鲍曼尼菌[8.7%(8/92)]和MRSA[4.3%(4/92)]。VAP组与非VAP组的平均检测时间(10.7±1.5 d∶9.4±1.8 d, P>0.05)差异无统计学意义。VAP组的死亡率明显高于非VAP组(39.4% vs. 23.1%)。结论:通气患者下呼吸道有无VAP均存在不同程度的MDR,影响患者预后,应加强监测。抗生素应经验性处方并动态调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Early treatment of atelectasis by bronchoscopy in craniotomy patients]. [Effects of ulinastatin on Toll like receptor 4 expression in endotoxin induced myocardial injury rats]. [Evaluation of circulating microRNA-92a for endothelial damage induced by percutaneous coronary intervention]. [The predictive values of D-dimer for the early prognosis of the acute myocardial infarction (AMI): a review of 3134 AMI patients]. [Correlation between osteoprotegerin gene 209G/A, 245T/G and 1181G/C polymorphism and acute coronary syndromes in Han people of Fujian area].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1