Comparative study between the radiopacity levels of high viscosity and of flowable composite resins, using digital imaging.

Emiko S Arita, Gilson P Silveira, Arthur R Cortes, Henrique C Brucoli
{"title":"Comparative study between the radiopacity levels of high viscosity and of flowable composite resins, using digital imaging.","authors":"Emiko S Arita,&nbsp;Gilson P Silveira,&nbsp;Arthur R Cortes,&nbsp;Henrique C Brucoli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The development of countless types and trends of high viscosite and flowable composite resins, with different physical and chemical properties applicable to their broad use in dental clinics calls for further studies regarding their radiopacity level.</p><p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity levels of high viscosity and the flowable composite resins, using digital imaging.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>96 composite resin discs 5 mm in diameter and 3 mm thick were radiographed and analyzed. The image acquisition system used was the Digora® Phosphor Storage System and the images were analyzed with the Digora software for Windows. The exposure conditions were: 70 kVp, 8 mA, and 0.2 s. The focal distance was 40 cm. The image densities were obtained with the pixel values of the materials in the digital image.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the high viscosity composite resins presented higher radiopacity levels than the flowable composite resins, with statistically significant differences between the trends and groups analyzed (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the high viscosity composite resins, Tetric®Ceram presented the highest radiopacity levels and Glacier® presented the lowest. Among the flowable composite resins, Tetric®Flow presented the highest radiopacity levels and Wave® presented the lowest.</p>","PeriodicalId":88322,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry","volume":"7 4","pages":"430-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The development of countless types and trends of high viscosite and flowable composite resins, with different physical and chemical properties applicable to their broad use in dental clinics calls for further studies regarding their radiopacity level.

Purpose of the study: The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity levels of high viscosity and the flowable composite resins, using digital imaging.

Materials and methods: 96 composite resin discs 5 mm in diameter and 3 mm thick were radiographed and analyzed. The image acquisition system used was the Digora® Phosphor Storage System and the images were analyzed with the Digora software for Windows. The exposure conditions were: 70 kVp, 8 mA, and 0.2 s. The focal distance was 40 cm. The image densities were obtained with the pixel values of the materials in the digital image.

Results: Most of the high viscosity composite resins presented higher radiopacity levels than the flowable composite resins, with statistically significant differences between the trends and groups analyzed (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Among the high viscosity composite resins, Tetric®Ceram presented the highest radiopacity levels and Glacier® presented the lowest. Among the flowable composite resins, Tetric®Flow presented the highest radiopacity levels and Wave® presented the lowest.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高粘度复合树脂与可流动复合树脂放射不透明度的数字成像比较研究。
导语:高粘、可流动复合树脂的种类和发展趋势,具有不同的物理和化学性质,适用于牙科诊所的广泛应用,要求进一步研究其放射不透性水平。研究目的:本研究的目的是利用数字成像技术评估高粘度和可流动复合树脂的放射不透性水平。材料与方法:对96个直径5mm、厚度3mm的复合树脂圆盘进行x线摄影分析。使用的图像采集系统是Digora®磷光体存储系统,使用Digora Windows软件分析图像。暴露条件为:70 kVp, 8 mA, 0.2 s。焦距为40 cm。利用数字图像中材料的像素值获得图像密度。结果:大多数高粘度复合树脂的放射不透性高于可流动复合树脂,趋势和组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:在高粘度复合树脂中,Tetric®Ceram的不透性最高,Glacier®的不透性最低。在可流动复合树脂中,Tetric®Flow具有最高的放射不透明度,Wave®具有最低的放射不透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biologically oriented dentistry. Biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT): a new approach for prosthetic restoration of periodontically healthy teeth. Modified two-stage procedures for the treatment of gingival recession. Esthetic direct restorations in endodontically treated anterior teeth. Modern treatment planning approach facing a failure of conventional treatment. Part II: case report and discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1