The Mental Health Care Act No 17 - South Africa. Trials and triumphs: 2002-2012.

S Ramlall
{"title":"The Mental Health Care Act No 17 - South Africa. Trials and triumphs: 2002-2012.","authors":"S Ramlall","doi":"10.4314/ajpsy.v15i6.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Mental Health Care Act 17 of 2002 (MHCA) was promulgated in 2004. It has been hailed as one of the most progressive pieces of mental health legislation. A true measure of its merit is the degree to which it has transformed mental health services and in particular improved the quality of care. This paper will describe the impact of the Act on mental health care service delivery in the country. Literature pertaining to the MHCA published from 2006-2012, a report compiled by the South African Society of Psychiatrists and the results of a national survey conducted among Heads of Departments of Psychiatry, Mental Health Review Boards and Provincial Directors of Mental Health was reviewed. The MHCA has been successful in shifting the emphasis of care from psychiatric institutions to general hospitals. However, the integration of services has been hampered by infrastructure constraints and shortages of mental health personnel. It has been less successful in integrating mental health care into primary health services where the focus remains largely on the pharmacological maintenance treatment of the chronically mentally ill. Little attention has been given to the health promotion, disease prevention and rehabilitation aspects of care. Mental health review boards contend with limited resources, administrative challenges and limited political support. Isolated pockets of success characterised the implementation of the MHCA across the country. Greater investment of resources is needed to ensure the comprehensive implementation of the Act.</p>","PeriodicalId":55549,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"15 6","pages":"407-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/ajpsy.v15i6.49","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ajpsy.v15i6.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The Mental Health Care Act 17 of 2002 (MHCA) was promulgated in 2004. It has been hailed as one of the most progressive pieces of mental health legislation. A true measure of its merit is the degree to which it has transformed mental health services and in particular improved the quality of care. This paper will describe the impact of the Act on mental health care service delivery in the country. Literature pertaining to the MHCA published from 2006-2012, a report compiled by the South African Society of Psychiatrists and the results of a national survey conducted among Heads of Departments of Psychiatry, Mental Health Review Boards and Provincial Directors of Mental Health was reviewed. The MHCA has been successful in shifting the emphasis of care from psychiatric institutions to general hospitals. However, the integration of services has been hampered by infrastructure constraints and shortages of mental health personnel. It has been less successful in integrating mental health care into primary health services where the focus remains largely on the pharmacological maintenance treatment of the chronically mentally ill. Little attention has been given to the health promotion, disease prevention and rehabilitation aspects of care. Mental health review boards contend with limited resources, administrative challenges and limited political support. Isolated pockets of success characterised the implementation of the MHCA across the country. Greater investment of resources is needed to ensure the comprehensive implementation of the Act.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《第17号精神保健法案》————南非。考验与胜利:2002年至2012年。
2004年颁布了2002年第17号《精神保健法》。它被誉为最进步的精神健康立法之一。衡量其价值的真正标准是它在多大程度上改变了精神卫生服务,特别是提高了护理质量。本文将描述该法对该国精神卫生保健服务提供的影响。审查了2006-2012年发表的与MHCA有关的文献、南非精神科医生学会编写的一份报告以及在精神病学部门负责人、精神卫生审查委员会和省级精神卫生主任之间进行的一项全国调查的结果。MHCA成功地将护理的重点从精神病院转移到综合医院。然而,由于基础设施的限制和精神卫生人员的短缺,这些服务的整合受到了阻碍。在将精神卫生保健纳入初级卫生服务方面不太成功,初级卫生服务的重点仍然主要放在慢性精神病患者的药物维持治疗上。很少注意保健的促进健康、预防疾病和康复方面。精神健康审查委员会面临着有限的资源、行政挑战和有限的政治支持。在全国范围内实施MHCA的特点是个别地区的成功。需要投入更多的资源,以确保该法得到全面执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Improving mental health systems in Africa. Homemade heroin substitute causing hallucinations. Sodium valproate for the treatment of mania in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. The accuracy of interpreting key psychiatric terms by ad hoc interpreters at a South African psychiatric hospital. Mild cognitive impairment and dementia in a heterogeneous elderly population: prevalence and risk profile.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1