Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation.

Ryan P Merkow, Karl Y Bilimoria, Martin D McCarter, Joseph D Phillips, Malcolm M DeCamp, Karen L Sherman, Clifford Y Ko, David J Bentrem
{"title":"Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation.","authors":"Ryan P Merkow,&nbsp;Karl Y Bilimoria,&nbsp;Martin D McCarter,&nbsp;Joseph D Phillips,&nbsp;Malcolm M DeCamp,&nbsp;Karen L Sherman,&nbsp;Clifford Y Ko,&nbsp;David J Bentrem","doi":"10.1001/2013.jamasurg.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>When assessing the effect of operative approach on outcomes, it may be less relevant whether a transhiatal or an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was performed and may be more important to focus on patient selection and the quality of the hospital performing the operation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Individuals undergoing esophagectomy were identified from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2010. The following 4 groups were created based on operative approach: transhiatal, Ivor Lewis, 3-field, and any approach with an intestinal conduit.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes and hospital-level variation in performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 164 hospitals, 1738 patients underwent an esophageal resection: 710 (40.9%) were transhiatal, 497 (28.6%) were Ivor Lewis, 361 (20.8%) were 3-field, and 170 (9.8%) were intestinal conduits. Compared with the transhiatal approach, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was not associated with increased risk for postoperative complications; however, 3-field esophagectomy was associated with increased likelihood of postoperative pneumonia (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.28-2.77) and prolonged ventilation exceeding 48 hours (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.16-2.42). Intestinal conduit use was associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.08-6.47), prolonged ventilation exceeding 48 hours (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.01-2.54), and return to the operating room for any indication (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.16-2.96). Patient characteristics were the strongest predictive factors for 30-day mortality and serious morbidity. After case-mix adjustment, hospital performance varied by 161% for 30-day mortality and by 84% for serious morbidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with transhiatal dissection, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy did not result in worse postoperative complications. After controlling for case-mix, hospital performance varied widely for all outcomes assessed, indicating that reductions in short-term outcomes will likely result from expanding other aspects of hospital quality beyond a focus on specific technical maneuvers.</p>","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 11","pages":"1009-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/2013.jamasurg.96","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/2013.jamasurg.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Hypothesis: When assessing the effect of operative approach on outcomes, it may be less relevant whether a transhiatal or an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was performed and may be more important to focus on patient selection and the quality of the hospital performing the operation.

Design: Observational study.

Setting: Hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Patients: Individuals undergoing esophagectomy were identified from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2010. The following 4 groups were created based on operative approach: transhiatal, Ivor Lewis, 3-field, and any approach with an intestinal conduit.

Main outcome measures: Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes and hospital-level variation in performance.

Results: At 164 hospitals, 1738 patients underwent an esophageal resection: 710 (40.9%) were transhiatal, 497 (28.6%) were Ivor Lewis, 361 (20.8%) were 3-field, and 170 (9.8%) were intestinal conduits. Compared with the transhiatal approach, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was not associated with increased risk for postoperative complications; however, 3-field esophagectomy was associated with increased likelihood of postoperative pneumonia (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.28-2.77) and prolonged ventilation exceeding 48 hours (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.16-2.42). Intestinal conduit use was associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.08-6.47), prolonged ventilation exceeding 48 hours (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.01-2.54), and return to the operating room for any indication (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.16-2.96). Patient characteristics were the strongest predictive factors for 30-day mortality and serious morbidity. After case-mix adjustment, hospital performance varied by 161% for 30-day mortality and by 84% for serious morbidity.

Conclusions: Compared with transhiatal dissection, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy did not result in worse postoperative complications. After controlling for case-mix, hospital performance varied widely for all outcomes assessed, indicating that reductions in short-term outcomes will likely result from expanding other aspects of hospital quality beyond a focus on specific technical maneuvers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
164家美国外科学会国家外科质量改进计划医院食管癌切除术后的短期疗效:手术入路的影响和医院水平差异
假设:在评估手术入路对预后的影响时,是否进行了经口食管切除术或Ivor Lewis食管切除术可能不太相关,而更重要的可能是关注患者选择和实施手术的医院质量。设计:观察性研究。环境:参与美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划的医院。患者:2005年1月1日至2010年12月31日,患者接受食管切除术。根据手术入路分为四组:经肠入路、Ivor Lewis入路、三场入路和任何经肠管入路。主要结果测量:风险调整后的30天结果和医院水平的表现变化。结果:164家医院共1738例患者行食管切除术,其中经食管710例(40.9%),Ivor Lewis切除术497例(28.6%),三场切除术361例(20.8%),肠导管切除术170例(9.8%)。与经食管入路相比,Ivor Lewis食管切除术与术后并发症风险增加无关;然而,三场食管切除术与术后肺炎的可能性增加相关(优势比[OR], 1.88;95% CI, 1.28-2.77)和延长通气时间超过48小时(OR, 1.68;95% ci, 1.16-2.42)。肠管使用与30天死亡率增加相关(OR, 2.65;95% CI, 1.08-6.47),延长通气时间超过48小时(OR, 1.61;95% CI, 1.01-2.54),并因任何适应症返回手术室(OR, 1.85;95% ci, 1.16-2.96)。患者特征是30天死亡率和严重发病率的最强预测因素。在病例组合调整后,30天死亡率的医院绩效差异为161%,严重发病率的医院绩效差异为84%。结论:Ivor Lewis食管切除术与经食管清扫术相比,术后并发症无明显差异。在控制病例组合后,医院的表现在所有评估结果中差异很大,表明短期结果的降低可能是由于扩大医院质量的其他方面而不是专注于具体的技术操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Surgery
Archives of Surgery 医学-外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Synchronous Breast and Thyroid Cancer: Correlation Between two Pathologies and Management Challenges Vascularized Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve in Entrapment Syndrome at the Elbow Pseudohermaphroditism. Brothers. Preoperative biopsy evaluation of chemotherapy-associated liver injuries: looking for a needle in a haystack? Comment on "prospective evaluation of accuracy of liver biopsy findings in the identification of chemotherapy-associated liver injury".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1