A Sequential Phase 2b Trial Design for Evaluating Vaccine Efficacy and Immune Correlates for Multiple HIV Vaccine Regimens.

Peter B Gilbert, Douglas Grove, Erin Gabriel, Ying Huang, Glenda Gray, Scott M Hammer, Susan P Buchbinder, James Kublin, Lawrence Corey, Steven G Self
{"title":"A Sequential Phase 2b Trial Design for Evaluating Vaccine Efficacy and Immune Correlates for Multiple HIV Vaccine Regimens.","authors":"Peter B Gilbert,&nbsp;Douglas Grove,&nbsp;Erin Gabriel,&nbsp;Ying Huang,&nbsp;Glenda Gray,&nbsp;Scott M Hammer,&nbsp;Susan P Buchbinder,&nbsp;James Kublin,&nbsp;Lawrence Corey,&nbsp;Steven G Self","doi":"10.2202/1948-4690.1037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Five preventative HIV vaccine efficacy trials have been conducted over the last 12 years, all of which evaluated vaccine efficacy (VE) to prevent HIV infection for a single vaccine regimen versus placebo. Now that one of these trials has supported partial VE of a prime-boost vaccine regimen, there is interest in conducting efficacy trials that simultaneously evaluate multiple prime-boost vaccine regimens against a shared placebo group in the same geographic region, for accelerating the pace of vaccine development. This article proposes such a design, which has main objectives (1) to evaluate VE of each regimen versus placebo against HIV exposures occurring near the time of the immunizations; (2) to evaluate durability of VE for each vaccine regimen showing reliable evidence for positive VE; (3) to expeditiously evaluate the immune correlates of protection if any vaccine regimen shows reliable evidence for positive VE; and (4) to compare VE among the vaccine regimens. The design uses sequential monitoring for the events of vaccine harm, non-efficacy, and high efficacy, selected to weed out poor vaccines as rapidly as possible while guarding against prematurely weeding out a vaccine that does not confer efficacy until most of the immunizations are received. The evaluation of the design shows that testing multiple vaccine regimens is important for providing a well-powered assessment of the correlation of vaccine-induced immune responses with HIV infection, and is critically important for providing a reasonably powered assessment of the value of identified correlates as surrogate endpoints for HIV infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":74867,"journal":{"name":"Statistical communications in infectious diseases","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2202/1948-4690.1037","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical communications in infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1948-4690.1037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Five preventative HIV vaccine efficacy trials have been conducted over the last 12 years, all of which evaluated vaccine efficacy (VE) to prevent HIV infection for a single vaccine regimen versus placebo. Now that one of these trials has supported partial VE of a prime-boost vaccine regimen, there is interest in conducting efficacy trials that simultaneously evaluate multiple prime-boost vaccine regimens against a shared placebo group in the same geographic region, for accelerating the pace of vaccine development. This article proposes such a design, which has main objectives (1) to evaluate VE of each regimen versus placebo against HIV exposures occurring near the time of the immunizations; (2) to evaluate durability of VE for each vaccine regimen showing reliable evidence for positive VE; (3) to expeditiously evaluate the immune correlates of protection if any vaccine regimen shows reliable evidence for positive VE; and (4) to compare VE among the vaccine regimens. The design uses sequential monitoring for the events of vaccine harm, non-efficacy, and high efficacy, selected to weed out poor vaccines as rapidly as possible while guarding against prematurely weeding out a vaccine that does not confer efficacy until most of the immunizations are received. The evaluation of the design shows that testing multiple vaccine regimens is important for providing a well-powered assessment of the correlation of vaccine-induced immune responses with HIV infection, and is critically important for providing a reasonably powered assessment of the value of identified correlates as surrogate endpoints for HIV infection.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项评估多种HIV疫苗方案的疫苗效力和免疫相关因素的序贯2b期试验设计
在过去12年中进行了五项预防性艾滋病毒疫苗效力试验,所有试验都评估了单一疫苗方案与安慰剂相比预防艾滋病毒感染的疫苗效力(VE)。现在,其中一项试验已经支持了一种主要-加强疫苗方案的部分有效性,因此有兴趣进行功效试验,同时评估同一地理区域内的多种主要-加强疫苗方案与同一安慰剂组的疗效,以加快疫苗开发的步伐。本文提出了这样一种设计,其主要目标是(1)评估每种方案与安慰剂相比,在免疫接种前后HIV暴露的VE;(2)评估有可靠证据表明VE阳性的各疫苗方案的VE持久性;(3)如果任何疫苗方案显示可靠的VE阳性证据,则迅速评估保护的免疫相关因素;(4)比较不同疫苗方案的VE。该设计采用对疫苗危害、无效和高效事件的连续监测,选择以尽可能快地淘汰不良疫苗,同时防止过早淘汰在接受大多数免疫接种之前不具有效力的疫苗。对设计的评估表明,测试多种疫苗方案对于提供疫苗诱导的免疫反应与HIV感染相关性的有力评估非常重要,并且对于提供确定的相关物作为HIV感染替代终点的价值的合理有力评估至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study design approaches for future active-controlled HIV prevention trials. The role of randomization inference in unraveling individual treatment effects in early phase vaccine trials. Nonlinear mixed-effects models for HIV viral load trajectories before and after antiretroviral therapy interruption, incorporating left censoring. Estimation and interpretation of vaccine efficacy in COVID-19 randomized clinical trials Sample size calculation for active-arm trial with counterfactual incidence based on recency assay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1