Initial clinical experience with robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer.

Ju-A Park, Gyu-Seog Choi, Jun Seok Park, Soo Yeun Park
{"title":"Initial clinical experience with robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer.","authors":"Ju-A Park,&nbsp;Gyu-Seog Choi,&nbsp;Jun Seok Park,&nbsp;Soo Yeun Park","doi":"10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was conducted to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of robotic extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of a prospectively-collected database at Kyungpook National University Medical Center from January 2011 to November revealed a series of 8 consecutive robotic LPLD cases with a preoperative diagnosis of lateral node metastasis. Data regarding patient demographics, operating time, perioperative blood loss, surgical morbidity, lateral lymph node status, and functional outcome were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all eight patients, the procedures were completed without conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time of extended pelvic node dissection was 38 minutes (range, 20 to 51 minutes), the mean number of lateral lymph nodes harvested was 4.1 (range, 1 to 13), and 3 patients (38%) were found to have lymph node metastases. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 0% and 25%, respectively, but, there was no LPLD-related morbidity. The mean hospital stay was 7.5 days (range, 5 to 12 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic LPLD is safe and feasible, with the advantage of being a minimally invasive approach. Further large-scale studies comparing robotic and conventional surgery with long-term follow-up evaluation are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/8e/jksc-28-265.PMC3499428.pdf","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of robotic extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

Methods: A review of a prospectively-collected database at Kyungpook National University Medical Center from January 2011 to November revealed a series of 8 consecutive robotic LPLD cases with a preoperative diagnosis of lateral node metastasis. Data regarding patient demographics, operating time, perioperative blood loss, surgical morbidity, lateral lymph node status, and functional outcome were analyzed.

Results: In all eight patients, the procedures were completed without conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time of extended pelvic node dissection was 38 minutes (range, 20 to 51 minutes), the mean number of lateral lymph nodes harvested was 4.1 (range, 1 to 13), and 3 patients (38%) were found to have lymph node metastases. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 0% and 25%, respectively, but, there was no LPLD-related morbidity. The mean hospital stay was 7.5 days (range, 5 to 12 days).

Conclusion: Robotic LPLD is safe and feasible, with the advantage of being a minimally invasive approach. Further large-scale studies comparing robotic and conventional surgery with long-term follow-up evaluation are needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人骨盆外侧淋巴结清扫治疗晚期直肠癌的初步临床经验。
目的:本研究旨在评估机器人扩展盆腔外侧淋巴结清扫术(LPLD)在晚期低位直肠癌患者中的技术可行性和安全性。方法:回顾2011年1月至11月在庆北国立大学医学中心前瞻性收集的数据库,发现了一系列连续8例术前诊断为外侧淋巴结转移的机器人LPLD病例。分析患者人口统计学、手术时间、围手术期出血量、手术发病率、外侧淋巴结状态和功能结局等数据。结果:所有8例患者均完成手术,未转开腹手术。延长盆腔淋巴结清扫术的平均手术时间为38分钟(范围20 ~ 51分钟),平均切除外侧淋巴结4.1个(范围1 ~ 13个),发现3例(38%)患者存在淋巴结转移。术后死亡率和发病率分别为0%和25%,但无lpld相关的发病率。平均住院时间为7.5天(范围5至12天)。结论:机器人LPLD是安全可行的,具有微创的优点。需要进一步的大规模研究来比较机器人手术和传统手术,并进行长期随访评估,以证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy. Finding a new prognostic biomarker for metastatic colorectal cancer. Pelvic exenteration: surgical approaches. Association of immune status with recurrent anal condylomata in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients. Analysis of risk factors for the development of incisional and parastomal hernias in patients after colorectal surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1