Robert W Arnold, Daniel Tulip, Erin McArthur, Janet Shen, John Tappel, Laura E Arnold, Elizabeth Winkle, M Diane Armitage
{"title":"Predictive value from pediatrician plusoptix screening: impact of refraction and binocular alignment.","authors":"Robert W Arnold, Daniel Tulip, Erin McArthur, Janet Shen, John Tappel, Laura E Arnold, Elizabeth Winkle, M Diane Armitage","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The positive predictive value (PPV) of conventional preschool acuity screening is about 50% whereas previous Polaroid photoscreening with experienced interpretation can achieve PPV greater than 85%. The Plusoptix photoscreener has immediate computer interpretation and a CPT code available to pediatricians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two Plusoptix SO9 were used in two pediatric group practices with previously validated refractive criteria and new manufacturer's binocular alignment criteria. CPT billing was monitored. Referred patients had prior gold-standard AAPOS examinations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12% of 675 photoscreened preschoolers were referred. Of the 39 with AAPOS gold-standard exams, the PPV from strabismus referrals was 17%, while 26 of 27 refractive referrals had true amblyopia risk factors (PPV 96%). Screening CPT code 99174 reimbursement rose from zero to half of insurers in 15 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plusoptix photoscreening is valid after adjusting the binocular alignment criteria. Such photoscreening should be employed by pediatric practices to detect and ultimately to reduce amblyopia vision impairment in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":72356,"journal":{"name":"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's","volume":" ","pages":"227-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The positive predictive value (PPV) of conventional preschool acuity screening is about 50% whereas previous Polaroid photoscreening with experienced interpretation can achieve PPV greater than 85%. The Plusoptix photoscreener has immediate computer interpretation and a CPT code available to pediatricians.
Methods: Two Plusoptix SO9 were used in two pediatric group practices with previously validated refractive criteria and new manufacturer's binocular alignment criteria. CPT billing was monitored. Referred patients had prior gold-standard AAPOS examinations.
Results: 12% of 675 photoscreened preschoolers were referred. Of the 39 with AAPOS gold-standard exams, the PPV from strabismus referrals was 17%, while 26 of 27 refractive referrals had true amblyopia risk factors (PPV 96%). Screening CPT code 99174 reimbursement rose from zero to half of insurers in 15 months.
Conclusion: Plusoptix photoscreening is valid after adjusting the binocular alignment criteria. Such photoscreening should be employed by pediatric practices to detect and ultimately to reduce amblyopia vision impairment in children.