Improving safety of preemptive therapy with oral valganciclovir for cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Bone Marrow Research Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-12-03 DOI:10.1155/2012/874601
Corinna Barkam, Haytham Kamal, Elke Dammann, Helmut Diedrich, Stefanie Buchholz, Matthias Eder, Jürgen Krauter, Arnold Ganser, Michael Stadler
{"title":"Improving safety of preemptive therapy with oral valganciclovir for cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.","authors":"Corinna Barkam,&nbsp;Haytham Kamal,&nbsp;Elke Dammann,&nbsp;Helmut Diedrich,&nbsp;Stefanie Buchholz,&nbsp;Matthias Eder,&nbsp;Jürgen Krauter,&nbsp;Arnold Ganser,&nbsp;Michael Stadler","doi":"10.1155/2012/874601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Valganciclovir (VGC), an oral prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), has been shown to clear cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia in preemptive treatment of patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), apparently without significant toxicity. Since VGC obviates hospitalization, it is increasingly being adopted, although not approved, in alloHSCT. When we retrospectively evaluated preemptive treatment with VGC versus GCV, foscarnet or cidofovir, in all 312 consecutive CMV viremias of 169 patients allotransplanted at our institution between 1996 and 2006, we found VGC more efficacious (79%) than non-VGC therapies (69%). The advantage of outpatient VGC, however, was outbalanced by more profound neutropenias (including two cases of agranulocytosis, one with graft loss) requiring subsequent prolonged rehospitalization. Thus, in a second, prospective cohort from 2007 to 2011 (all 202 consecutive CMV viremias of 118 yet older and sicker patients), we implemented twice weekly neutrophil monitoring during outpatient VGC treatment and avoided VGC maintenance therapy. While conserving efficacy (VGC 71%, non-VGC 72%), we could now demonstrate a reduced mean duration of hospitalization with VGC (9 days (0-66)) compared to non-VGC (25 days (0-115)), without any agranulocytosis episodes. We conclude that safe outpatient VGC therapy is possible in alloHSCT recipients, but requires frequent monitoring to prevent severe myelotoxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9220,"journal":{"name":"Bone Marrow Research","volume":"2012 ","pages":"874601"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2012/874601","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone Marrow Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/874601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Valganciclovir (VGC), an oral prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), has been shown to clear cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia in preemptive treatment of patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), apparently without significant toxicity. Since VGC obviates hospitalization, it is increasingly being adopted, although not approved, in alloHSCT. When we retrospectively evaluated preemptive treatment with VGC versus GCV, foscarnet or cidofovir, in all 312 consecutive CMV viremias of 169 patients allotransplanted at our institution between 1996 and 2006, we found VGC more efficacious (79%) than non-VGC therapies (69%). The advantage of outpatient VGC, however, was outbalanced by more profound neutropenias (including two cases of agranulocytosis, one with graft loss) requiring subsequent prolonged rehospitalization. Thus, in a second, prospective cohort from 2007 to 2011 (all 202 consecutive CMV viremias of 118 yet older and sicker patients), we implemented twice weekly neutrophil monitoring during outpatient VGC treatment and avoided VGC maintenance therapy. While conserving efficacy (VGC 71%, non-VGC 72%), we could now demonstrate a reduced mean duration of hospitalization with VGC (9 days (0-66)) compared to non-VGC (25 days (0-115)), without any agranulocytosis episodes. We conclude that safe outpatient VGC therapy is possible in alloHSCT recipients, but requires frequent monitoring to prevent severe myelotoxicity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高口服缬更昔洛韦治疗同种异体造血干细胞移植后巨细胞病毒感染的安全性
缬更昔洛韦(VGC)是更昔洛韦(GCV)的口服前药,已被证明在同种异体造血干细胞移植(alloHSCT)后患者的预防性治疗中可以清除巨细胞病毒(CMV)病毒血症,显然没有明显的毒性。由于VGC可以避免住院治疗,因此在同种异体造血干细胞移植中越来越多地被采用,尽管尚未获得批准。当我们回顾性评估VGC与GCV、foscarnet或cidofovir的预防性治疗时,我们发现VGC比非VGC治疗更有效(79%)。1996年至2006年期间,在我们机构进行了169例同种异体移植患者的312例连续CMV病毒血症。然而,门诊VGC的优势被更严重的中性粒细胞减少(包括2例粒细胞缺乏症,1例移植物丢失)所抵消,需要随后延长再住院时间。因此,在2007年至2011年的第二个前瞻性队列中(118名老年和病情较重的患者的所有202例CMV病毒血症),我们在门诊VGC治疗期间实施了每周两次的中性粒细胞监测,并避免了VGC维持治疗。在保持疗效(VGC 71%,非VGC 72%)的同时,我们现在可以证明VGC的平均住院时间(9天(0-66))比非VGC(25天(0-115))缩短,没有任何粒细胞缺乏症发作。我们的结论是,安全的门诊VGC治疗在同种异体造血干细胞移植受者中是可能的,但需要经常监测以防止严重的髓毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BET Inhibition Suppresses S100A8 and S100A9 Expression in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells and Synergises with Daunorubicin in Causing Cell Death. Antimicrobial-Induced Cytopenia and Bone Marrow Hypocellularity in Patients with Cirrhosis. Comparative Analysis of Cellular and Growth Factor Composition in Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate and Platelet-Rich Plasma. Optimization of Ex Vivo Murine Bone Marrow Derived Immature Dendritic Cells: A Comparative Analysis of Flask Culture Method and Mouse CD11c Positive Selection Kit Method. Feasibility and Efficacy of Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Transplantation Combined with Human Parathyroid Hormone 1-34 Administration to Treat Osteonecrosis in a Rabbit Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1