Effects of prior abdominal surgery, obesity, and lumbar spine level on anterior retroperitoneal exposure of the lumbar spine.

Abid Mogannam, Christian Bianchi, Jason Chiriano, Sheela Patel, Theodore H Teruya, Sharon S Lum, Ahmed M Abou-Zamzam
{"title":"Effects of prior abdominal surgery, obesity, and lumbar spine level on anterior retroperitoneal exposure of the lumbar spine.","authors":"Abid Mogannam,&nbsp;Christian Bianchi,&nbsp;Jason Chiriano,&nbsp;Sheela Patel,&nbsp;Theodore H Teruya,&nbsp;Sharon S Lum,&nbsp;Ahmed M Abou-Zamzam","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of prior abdominal surgery and obesity and the level of spine exposure on the technical aspects and complications of anterior retroperitoneal exposure of the lumbar spine (ARES).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review of prospective database.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic vascular surgery practice.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients undergoing ARES from 2001 to 2011.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Influence of prior abdominal surgery, obesity, and level of exposure on time to spine exposure and incidence of vascular and perioperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred seventy-six patients underwent ARES. Mean (SD) age was 47.7 (12.6) years; 46.6% had undergone prior abdominal surgery. Mean (SD) body mass index (BMI) was 28.3 (5.5); 61.6% of procedures included the L4-5 disk. Mean (SD) time to exposure was 70.0 (25.5) minutes. Vascular injury occurred in 23.3% (3.8% major). Perioperative complications occurred in 16.4% of cases. Prior abdominal surgery had no effect on time to exposure, vascular injury, and perioperative complications. A BMI of 30 or more had no effect on time to exposure compared with a lower BMI. A BMI of 30 or more led to higher rates of vascular injury (30.8% vs 19.7%; P = .007) and overall complications (21.4% vs 14.0%; P = .04). Exposures involving L4-5 led to increased time to exposure (77.0 vs 56.2 minutes; P < .001) and higher rates of vascular injury (29.7% vs 13.1%; P < .001) but had no effect on overall complications compared with exposures for other levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prior abdominal surgery should not be considered a contraindication to ARES. Caution is warranted in obese patients and exposures involving L4-5.</p>","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1130-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1148","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of prior abdominal surgery and obesity and the level of spine exposure on the technical aspects and complications of anterior retroperitoneal exposure of the lumbar spine (ARES).

Design: Retrospective review of prospective database.

Setting: Academic vascular surgery practice.

Patients: Patients undergoing ARES from 2001 to 2011.

Main outcome measures: Influence of prior abdominal surgery, obesity, and level of exposure on time to spine exposure and incidence of vascular and perioperative complications.

Results: Four hundred seventy-six patients underwent ARES. Mean (SD) age was 47.7 (12.6) years; 46.6% had undergone prior abdominal surgery. Mean (SD) body mass index (BMI) was 28.3 (5.5); 61.6% of procedures included the L4-5 disk. Mean (SD) time to exposure was 70.0 (25.5) minutes. Vascular injury occurred in 23.3% (3.8% major). Perioperative complications occurred in 16.4% of cases. Prior abdominal surgery had no effect on time to exposure, vascular injury, and perioperative complications. A BMI of 30 or more had no effect on time to exposure compared with a lower BMI. A BMI of 30 or more led to higher rates of vascular injury (30.8% vs 19.7%; P = .007) and overall complications (21.4% vs 14.0%; P = .04). Exposures involving L4-5 led to increased time to exposure (77.0 vs 56.2 minutes; P < .001) and higher rates of vascular injury (29.7% vs 13.1%; P < .001) but had no effect on overall complications compared with exposures for other levels.

Conclusion: Prior abdominal surgery should not be considered a contraindication to ARES. Caution is warranted in obese patients and exposures involving L4-5.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
既往腹部手术、肥胖和腰椎水平对腰椎腹膜后前暴露的影响。
目的:评价既往腹部手术、肥胖和脊柱暴露水平对腰椎前腹膜后暴露术(ARES)技术方面和并发症的影响。设计:前瞻性数据库的回顾性分析。单位:学术血管外科实习。患者:2001 - 2011年接受ARES治疗的患者。主要结局指标:既往腹部手术、肥胖和暴露水平对脊柱暴露时间和血管及围手术期并发症发生率的影响。结果:476例患者接受了ARES治疗。平均(SD)年龄为47.7(12.6)岁;46.6%曾接受过腹部手术。平均(SD)体重指数(BMI)为28.3 (5.5);61.6%的程序包括L4-5盘。平均(SD)暴露时间为70.0(25.5)分钟。血管损伤23.3%(严重3.8%)。围手术期并发症发生率为16.4%。既往腹部手术对暴露时间、血管损伤和围手术期并发症没有影响。与BMI较低的人相比,BMI在30或30以上的人对暴露时间没有影响。BMI为30或更高导致血管损伤的发生率更高(30.8% vs 19.7%;P = .007)和总并发症(21.4% vs 14.0%;P = .04)。涉及L4-5的曝光导致曝光时间增加(77.0 vs 56.2分钟;P < 0.001)和更高的血管损伤率(29.7% vs 13.1%;P < 0.001),但与其他水平的暴露相比,总体并发症没有影响。结论:既往腹部手术不应视为ARES的禁忌症。肥胖患者和涉及L4-5的暴露需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Surgery
Archives of Surgery 医学-外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Synchronous Breast and Thyroid Cancer: Correlation Between two Pathologies and Management Challenges Vascularized Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve in Entrapment Syndrome at the Elbow Pseudohermaphroditism. Brothers. Preoperative biopsy evaluation of chemotherapy-associated liver injuries: looking for a needle in a haystack? Comment on "prospective evaluation of accuracy of liver biopsy findings in the identification of chemotherapy-associated liver injury".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1