Assessing the encoding specificity of associations with sensory preconditioning procedures.

Tzu-Ching E Lin, Natasha M Dumigan, Dominic M Dwyer, Mark A Good, R C Honey
{"title":"Assessing the encoding specificity of associations with sensory preconditioning procedures.","authors":"Tzu-Ching E Lin,&nbsp;Natasha M Dumigan,&nbsp;Dominic M Dwyer,&nbsp;Mark A Good,&nbsp;R C Honey","doi":"10.1037/a0030662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three experiments examined the encoding specificity of associations using sensory preconditioning procedures in rats. In Experiment 1a, after exposure to two compounds (AX and BY), X (but not Y) was either followed by shock after a trace interval (Group Trace) or immediately followed by shock (Group Immediate). AX elicited less activity than BX (i.e., more fear) in Group Trace, but equivalent activity levels in Group Immediate. These results, replicated using a within-subjects design in Experiment 1b, indicate that the presence of A (on AX trials) generates fear because it associatively evokes X's memory into the same state as it was associated with the shock during (trace) conditioning. In Experiment 2, after exposure to AX and BY, X (but not Y) was immediately followed by shock. As in Experiment 1a, presentations of AX and BX elicited equivalent levels of fear, but there was more fear in the trace period after AX than in the trace period after BX. This finding suggests that during aversive conditioning, the associatively provoked memory of A was part of the conditioned complex, and that the trace of AX was more likely to activate this memory than was the trace of BX.</p>","PeriodicalId":51088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/a0030662","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Three experiments examined the encoding specificity of associations using sensory preconditioning procedures in rats. In Experiment 1a, after exposure to two compounds (AX and BY), X (but not Y) was either followed by shock after a trace interval (Group Trace) or immediately followed by shock (Group Immediate). AX elicited less activity than BX (i.e., more fear) in Group Trace, but equivalent activity levels in Group Immediate. These results, replicated using a within-subjects design in Experiment 1b, indicate that the presence of A (on AX trials) generates fear because it associatively evokes X's memory into the same state as it was associated with the shock during (trace) conditioning. In Experiment 2, after exposure to AX and BY, X (but not Y) was immediately followed by shock. As in Experiment 1a, presentations of AX and BX elicited equivalent levels of fear, but there was more fear in the trace period after AX than in the trace period after BX. This finding suggests that during aversive conditioning, the associatively provoked memory of A was part of the conditioned complex, and that the trace of AX was more likely to activate this memory than was the trace of BX.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估与感觉预处理程序相关的编码特异性。
三个实验考察了大鼠感觉预处理过程中联想的编码特异性。在实验1a中,暴露于两种化合物(AX和BY)后,X(而不是Y)在一段痕量间隔后被电击(组trace)或立即被电击(组Immediate)。在跟踪组中,AX引起的活动比BX少(即,更多的恐惧),但在立即组中却有相同的活动水平。这些结果,在实验1b中重复使用了受试者内部设计,表明a的存在(在AX试验中)会产生恐惧,因为它会联想地唤起X的记忆,使其进入与(追踪)条件反射期间与电击相关的相同状态。在实验2中,暴露于AX和BY后,X(而不是Y)立即发生休克。与实验1a一样,AX和BX的呈现引发了同等程度的恐惧,但AX后的追踪期比BX后的追踪期更令人恐惧。这一发现表明,在厌恶条件反射过程中,A的联想记忆是条件反射复合体的一部分,而AX的痕迹比BX的痕迹更有可能激活这种记忆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
23.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition publishes experimental and theoretical studies concerning all aspects of animal behavior processes.
期刊最新文献
Valence generalization across nonrecurring structures. Learned biases in the processing of outcomes: A brief review of the outcome predictability effect. Conditioned inhibition: Historical critiques and controversies in the light of recent advances. The partial reinforcement extinction effect: The proportion of trials reinforced during conditioning predicts the number of trials to extinction. On the role of responses in Pavlovian acquisition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1