A scoring algorithm for predicting the presence of adult asthma: a prospective derivation study.

Katsuyuki Tomita, Hiroyuki Sano, Yasutaka Chiba, Ryuji Sato, Akiko Sano, Osamu Nishiyama, Takashi Iwanaga, Yuji Higashimoto, Ryuta Haraguchi, Yuji Tohda
{"title":"A scoring algorithm for predicting the presence of adult asthma: a prospective derivation study.","authors":"Katsuyuki Tomita,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Sano,&nbsp;Yasutaka Chiba,&nbsp;Ryuji Sato,&nbsp;Akiko Sano,&nbsp;Osamu Nishiyama,&nbsp;Takashi Iwanaga,&nbsp;Yuji Higashimoto,&nbsp;Ryuta Haraguchi,&nbsp;Yuji Tohda","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2013.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To predict the presence of asthma in adult patients with respiratory symptoms, we developed a scoring algorithm using clinical parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively analysed 566 adult outpatients who visited Kinki University Hospital for the first time with complaints of nonspecific respiratory symptoms. Asthma was comprehensively diagnosed by specialists using symptoms, signs, and objective tools including bronchodilator reversibility and/or the assessment of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to categorise patients and determine the accuracy of diagnosing asthma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A scoring algorithm using the symptom-sign score was developed, based on diurnal variation of symptoms (1 point), recurrent episodes (2 points), medical history of allergic diseases (1 point), and wheeze sound (2 points). A score of >3 had 35% sensitivity and 97% specificity for discriminating between patients with and without asthma and assigned a high probability of having asthma (accuracy 90%). A score of 1 or 2 points assigned intermediate probability (accuracy 68%). After providing additional data of forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (FEV(1)/FVC) ratio <0.7, the post-test probability of having asthma was increased to 93%. A score of 0 points assigned low probability (accuracy 31%). After providing additional data of positive reversibility, the post-test probability of having asthma was increased to 88%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pragmatic diagnostic algorithm is useful for predicting the presence of adult asthma and for determining the appropriate time for consultation with a pulmonologist.</p>","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00005","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Background: To predict the presence of asthma in adult patients with respiratory symptoms, we developed a scoring algorithm using clinical parameters.

Methods: We prospectively analysed 566 adult outpatients who visited Kinki University Hospital for the first time with complaints of nonspecific respiratory symptoms. Asthma was comprehensively diagnosed by specialists using symptoms, signs, and objective tools including bronchodilator reversibility and/or the assessment of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to categorise patients and determine the accuracy of diagnosing asthma.

Results: A scoring algorithm using the symptom-sign score was developed, based on diurnal variation of symptoms (1 point), recurrent episodes (2 points), medical history of allergic diseases (1 point), and wheeze sound (2 points). A score of >3 had 35% sensitivity and 97% specificity for discriminating between patients with and without asthma and assigned a high probability of having asthma (accuracy 90%). A score of 1 or 2 points assigned intermediate probability (accuracy 68%). After providing additional data of forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (FEV(1)/FVC) ratio <0.7, the post-test probability of having asthma was increased to 93%. A score of 0 points assigned low probability (accuracy 31%). After providing additional data of positive reversibility, the post-test probability of having asthma was increased to 88%.

Conclusions: This pragmatic diagnostic algorithm is useful for predicting the presence of adult asthma and for determining the appropriate time for consultation with a pulmonologist.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测成人哮喘存在的评分算法:一项前瞻性衍生研究。
背景:为了预测有呼吸道症状的成年患者是否存在哮喘,我们开发了一种使用临床参数的评分算法。方法:对首次就诊近畿大学附属医院以非特异性呼吸道症状为主诉的566例成人门诊患者进行前瞻性分析。哮喘由专家使用症状、体征和客观工具进行全面诊断,包括支气管扩张剂可逆性和/或支气管高反应性(BHR)评估。采用多元logistic回归分析对患者进行分类并确定诊断哮喘的准确性。结果:基于症状的日变化(1分)、反复发作(2分)、过敏性疾病病史(1分)和喘息声(2分),开发了一种使用症状-体征评分的评分算法。如果评分>3,区分哮喘患者和非哮喘患者的敏感性为35%,特异性为97%,诊断为哮喘的概率较高(准确率为90%)。1分或2分的分数为中等概率(准确率68%)。在提供1秒用力呼气量/用力肺活量(FEV(1)/FVC)比率的额外数据后,结论:这种实用的诊断算法可用于预测成人哮喘的存在并确定与肺科医生咨询的适当时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Primary Care Respiratory Journal
Primary Care Respiratory Journal PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Management, morbidity and mortality of COPD during an 11-year period: an observational retrospective epidemiological register study in Sweden (PATHOS). Chronic disease co-morbidity of asthma and unscheduled asthma care among adults: results of the national telephone health interview survey German Health Update (GEDA) 2009 and 2010. Transgenerational occurrence of allergic disease and autoimmunity: general practice-based epidemiological research. Are GOLD ABCD groups better associated with health status and costs than GOLD 1234 grades? A cross-sectional study. Indolent pneumonia in a pregnant recent immigrant from Ethiopia: think TB.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1