Patient-identified quality indicators for colonoscopy services.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/574956
Maida J Sewitch, Catherine Dubé, Stephanie Brien, Mengzhu Jiang, Robert J Hilsden, Alan N Barkun, David Armstrong
{"title":"Patient-identified quality indicators for colonoscopy services.","authors":"Maida J Sewitch, Catherine Dubé, Stephanie Brien, Mengzhu Jiang, Robert J Hilsden, Alan N Barkun, David Armstrong","doi":"10.1155/2013/574956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current quality improvement tools for endoscopy services, such as the Global Rating Scale (GRS), emphasize the need for patient-centred care. However, there are no studies that have investigated patient expectations and/or perceptions of quality indicators in endoscopy services.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify quality indicators for colonoscopy services from the patient perspective; to rate indicators of importance; to determine factors that influence indicator ratings; and to compare the identified indicators with those of the GRS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-phase mixed methods study was undertaken in Montreal (Quebec), Calgary (Alberta) and Hamilton (Ontario) among patients ≥18 years of age who spoke and read English or French. In phase 1, focus group participants identified quality indicators that were then used to construct a survey questionnaire. In phase 2, survey questionnaires, which were completed immediately after colonoscopy, prompted respondents to rate the 20 focus group-derived indicators according to their level of importance (low, medium, high) and to list up to nine additional items. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors that influenced focus group-derived indicator ratings. Patient-identified indicators were compared with those used in the GRS to identify novel indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three quality indicator themes were identified by 66 participants in 12 focus groups: communication, comfort and service environment. Of the 828 surveys distributed, 402 (48.6%) were returned and 65% of focus group-derived indicators were rated highly important by at least 55% of survey respondents. Indicator ratings differed according to age, sex, site and perceived colorectal cancer risk. Of the 29 patient-identified indicators, 17 (58.6%) were novel.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients identified 17 novel quality indicators, suggesting that patients and health professionals differ in their perspectives with respect to quality in colonoscopy services.</p>","PeriodicalId":55285,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3545623/pdf/cjg27025.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/574956","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current quality improvement tools for endoscopy services, such as the Global Rating Scale (GRS), emphasize the need for patient-centred care. However, there are no studies that have investigated patient expectations and/or perceptions of quality indicators in endoscopy services.

Objectives: To identify quality indicators for colonoscopy services from the patient perspective; to rate indicators of importance; to determine factors that influence indicator ratings; and to compare the identified indicators with those of the GRS.

Methods: A two-phase mixed methods study was undertaken in Montreal (Quebec), Calgary (Alberta) and Hamilton (Ontario) among patients ≥18 years of age who spoke and read English or French. In phase 1, focus group participants identified quality indicators that were then used to construct a survey questionnaire. In phase 2, survey questionnaires, which were completed immediately after colonoscopy, prompted respondents to rate the 20 focus group-derived indicators according to their level of importance (low, medium, high) and to list up to nine additional items. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors that influenced focus group-derived indicator ratings. Patient-identified indicators were compared with those used in the GRS to identify novel indicators.

Results: Three quality indicator themes were identified by 66 participants in 12 focus groups: communication, comfort and service environment. Of the 828 surveys distributed, 402 (48.6%) were returned and 65% of focus group-derived indicators were rated highly important by at least 55% of survey respondents. Indicator ratings differed according to age, sex, site and perceived colorectal cancer risk. Of the 29 patient-identified indicators, 17 (58.6%) were novel.

Conclusions: Patients identified 17 novel quality indicators, suggesting that patients and health professionals differ in their perspectives with respect to quality in colonoscopy services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由患者确定的结肠镜检查服务质量指标。
背景:当前的内镜服务质量改进工具,如全球评分量表(GRS),强调了以患者为中心的护理需求。然而,目前还没有研究调查过患者对内窥镜检查服务质量指标的期望和/或看法:从患者的角度确定结肠镜检查服务的质量指标;对指标的重要性进行评分;确定影响指标评分的因素;并将确定的指标与全球结肠镜检查质量指标进行比较:在蒙特利尔(魁北克省)、卡尔加里(阿尔伯塔省)和汉密尔顿(安大略省)对年龄≥18 岁、能说和读英语或法语的患者分两个阶段进行了混合方法研究。在第一阶段,焦点小组参与者确定了质量指标,然后利用这些指标编制了调查问卷。在第二阶段,受访者在结肠镜检查后立即填写调查问卷,根据其重要程度(低、中、高)对焦点小组得出的 20 个指标进行评分,并列出最多 9 个附加项目。多重逻辑回归分析用于确定影响焦点小组衍生指标评级的因素。将患者确定的指标与 GRS 中使用的指标进行比较,以确定新的指标:12 个焦点小组的 66 名参与者确定了三个质量指标主题:沟通、舒适度和服务环境。在发放的 828 份调查问卷中,有 402 份(48.6%)被收回,65% 的焦点小组衍生指标被至少 55% 的调查对象评为 "非常重要"。指标评分因年龄、性别、就医地点和感知的结直肠癌风险而异。在患者确定的 29 项指标中,有 17 项(58.6%)是新指标:患者确定了 17 项新颖的质量指标,表明患者和医疗专业人员对结肠镜检查服务质量的看法不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of gastroenterology and liver disease - medicine and surgery. The Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is sponsored by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.
期刊最新文献
Hepatitis C. Yield and cost of performing screening tests for constipation in children. A randomized controlled trial comparing sequential with triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori in an Aboriginal community in the Canadian North. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in a Canadian Aboriginal population: results from the PRAIRIE study. Use of fecal occult blood test in hospitalized patients: survey of physicians practicing in a large central Canadian health region and Canadian gastroenterologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1