Influence of test site and baseline temperature on orofacial thermal thresholds.

Hye-Kyoung M Kim, Ki-Suk J R Kim, Mee-Eun Kim
{"title":"Influence of test site and baseline temperature on orofacial thermal thresholds.","authors":"Hye-Kyoung M Kim,&nbsp;Ki-Suk J R Kim,&nbsp;Mee-Eun Kim","doi":"10.11607/jop.1030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate thermal thresholds of selected orofacial sites, determine if there is a relationship between thermal thresholds at each site, and analyze the influence of two different baseline temperatures on thermal thresholds at the tongue tip.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty healthy men (mean age, 26 years) participated. Cold detection (CDT), warm detection (WDT), cold pain (CPT), and heat pain (HPT) thresholds were measured bilaterally at five orofacial sites (mentum, lower lip, cheek, forehead, and tongue tip). Relations between thermal thresholds at each test site were assessed. Thermal sensitivity of the tongue tip was compared at two different baseline temperatures (32°C and 36°C). One-way ANOVA, Turkey post-hoc test, paired t test and Pearson's correlation were used for statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference for CDT, WDT, and HPT between test sites (ANOVA, P < .001) but no significant difference for CPT (P = .634). Subjects sensitive to cooling were sensitive to warming at the mentum (r = 0.379), tongue tip (r = 0.610), and cheek (r = 0.431) but not at the other test sites. There was a strong negative correlation between CPT and HPT at all test sites. There was no significant difference for CDT and WDT at the baseline temperature of 36°C (paired t test, P = .660), but there was a significant difference at the baseline temperature of 32°C (P < .001). There were no significant differences between CPTs at the two different baseline temperatures (P = .773), while a significant difference existed between HPTs (P = .034).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thermal thresholds varied between the orofacial test sites, and baseline temperature affected thermal sensitivity of the tongue. Subjects who were relatively sensitive to cold tended to be more sensitive to heat.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":"27 3","pages":"263-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.1030","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orofacial pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Aims: To investigate thermal thresholds of selected orofacial sites, determine if there is a relationship between thermal thresholds at each site, and analyze the influence of two different baseline temperatures on thermal thresholds at the tongue tip.

Methods: Thirty healthy men (mean age, 26 years) participated. Cold detection (CDT), warm detection (WDT), cold pain (CPT), and heat pain (HPT) thresholds were measured bilaterally at five orofacial sites (mentum, lower lip, cheek, forehead, and tongue tip). Relations between thermal thresholds at each test site were assessed. Thermal sensitivity of the tongue tip was compared at two different baseline temperatures (32°C and 36°C). One-way ANOVA, Turkey post-hoc test, paired t test and Pearson's correlation were used for statistical analyses.

Results: There was a significant difference for CDT, WDT, and HPT between test sites (ANOVA, P < .001) but no significant difference for CPT (P = .634). Subjects sensitive to cooling were sensitive to warming at the mentum (r = 0.379), tongue tip (r = 0.610), and cheek (r = 0.431) but not at the other test sites. There was a strong negative correlation between CPT and HPT at all test sites. There was no significant difference for CDT and WDT at the baseline temperature of 36°C (paired t test, P = .660), but there was a significant difference at the baseline temperature of 32°C (P < .001). There were no significant differences between CPTs at the two different baseline temperatures (P = .773), while a significant difference existed between HPTs (P = .034).

Conclusion: Thermal thresholds varied between the orofacial test sites, and baseline temperature affected thermal sensitivity of the tongue. Subjects who were relatively sensitive to cold tended to be more sensitive to heat.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
试验部位和基线温度对口面部热阈值的影响。
目的:研究口腔面部选定部位的热阈值,确定每个部位的热阈值之间是否存在关系,并分析两种不同的基线温度对舌尖热阈值的影响。方法:30名健康男性,平均年龄26岁。冷检测(CDT)、热检测(WDT)、冷痛(CPT)和热痛(HPT)阈值分别在双侧五个口腔面部部位(颏部、下唇、脸颊、前额和舌尖)测量。评估了每个试验点的热阈值之间的关系。在两种不同的基线温度(32°C和36°C)下比较舌尖的热敏性。采用单因素方差分析、土耳其事后检验、配对t检验和Pearson相关进行统计分析。结果:不同试验点CDT、WDT、HPT差异有统计学意义(方差分析,P < 0.001), CPT差异无统计学意义(P = 0.634)。对冷却敏感的受试者在动量(r = 0.379)、舌尖(r = 0.610)和脸颊(r = 0.431)对变暖敏感,但在其他测试部位则不敏感。CPT与HPT在各测点呈显著负相关。基线温度为36℃时CDT和WDT差异无统计学意义(配对t检验,P = 0.660),基线温度为32℃时CDT和WDT差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。在两种不同基线温度下,CPTs之间无显著差异(P = 0.773),而HPTs之间存在显著差异(P = 0.034)。结论:不同测试部位的热阈值不同,基线温度影响舌的热敏性。对冷相对敏感的受试者往往对热更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of orofacial pain
Journal of orofacial pain 医学-牙科与口腔外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Way forward Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating intraoral orthopedic appliances for temporomandibular disorders. Neuroplasticity in the adaptation to prosthodontic treatment. Temporomandibular disorder pain after whiplash trauma: a systematic review. Why seek treatment for temporomandibular disorder pain complaints? A study based on semi-structured interviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1