Enhancement of ovarian malignancy on clinical contrast enhanced MRI studies.

ISRN obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-02-13 DOI:10.1155/2013/979345
Harpreet K Pannu, Weining Ma, Emily Craig Zabor, Chaya S Moskowitz, Richard R Barakat, Hedvig Hricak
{"title":"Enhancement of ovarian malignancy on clinical contrast enhanced MRI studies.","authors":"Harpreet K Pannu,&nbsp;Weining Ma,&nbsp;Emily Craig Zabor,&nbsp;Chaya S Moskowitz,&nbsp;Richard R Barakat,&nbsp;Hedvig Hricak","doi":"10.1155/2013/979345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose. To assess if there is a significant difference in enhancement of high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary compared with other ovarian malignancies on clinically performed contrast enhanced MRI studies. Methods. In this institutional-review-board-approved study, two radiologists reviewed contrast enhanced MRI scans in 37 patients with ovarian cancer. Readers measured the signal intensity (SI) of ovarian mass and gluteal fat pre- and postcontrast administration. Percentage enhancement (PE) was calculated as [(post-pre)/precontrast SI] × 100. Results. Pathology revealed 19 patients with unilateral and 18 patients with bilateral malignancies for a total of 55 malignant ovaries-high grade serous carcinoma in 25/55 ovaries (45%), other epithelial carcinomas in 12 ovaries (22%), nonepithelial cancers in 8 ovaries (14%), and borderline tumors in 10 ovaries (18%). Enhancement of high grade serous carcinoma was not significantly different from other invasive ovarian malignancies (Reader 1 P = 0.865; Reader 2 P = 0.353). Enhancement of invasive ovarian malignancies was more than borderline tumors but did not reach statistical significance (Reader 1P = 0.102; Reader 2 P = 0.072). Conclusion. On clinically performed contrast enhanced MRI studies, enhancement of high grade serous ovarian carcinoma is not significantly different from other ovarian malignancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73520,"journal":{"name":"ISRN obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"979345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/979345","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/979345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose. To assess if there is a significant difference in enhancement of high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary compared with other ovarian malignancies on clinically performed contrast enhanced MRI studies. Methods. In this institutional-review-board-approved study, two radiologists reviewed contrast enhanced MRI scans in 37 patients with ovarian cancer. Readers measured the signal intensity (SI) of ovarian mass and gluteal fat pre- and postcontrast administration. Percentage enhancement (PE) was calculated as [(post-pre)/precontrast SI] × 100. Results. Pathology revealed 19 patients with unilateral and 18 patients with bilateral malignancies for a total of 55 malignant ovaries-high grade serous carcinoma in 25/55 ovaries (45%), other epithelial carcinomas in 12 ovaries (22%), nonepithelial cancers in 8 ovaries (14%), and borderline tumors in 10 ovaries (18%). Enhancement of high grade serous carcinoma was not significantly different from other invasive ovarian malignancies (Reader 1 P = 0.865; Reader 2 P = 0.353). Enhancement of invasive ovarian malignancies was more than borderline tumors but did not reach statistical significance (Reader 1P = 0.102; Reader 2 P = 0.072). Conclusion. On clinically performed contrast enhanced MRI studies, enhancement of high grade serous ovarian carcinoma is not significantly different from other ovarian malignancies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卵巢恶性肿瘤的临床增强MRI检查。
目的。目的:评估高级别卵巢浆液性癌与其他卵巢恶性肿瘤在临床MRI增强检查中的增强效果是否有显著差异。方法。在这项机构审查委员会批准的研究中,两名放射科医生对37名卵巢癌患者进行了对比增强MRI扫描。阅读者测量对比前后卵巢肿块和臀脂肪的信号强度(SI)。百分比增强(PE)计算为[(pre - post)/pre - contrast SI] × 100。结果。病理显示单侧恶性肿瘤19例,双侧恶性肿瘤18例,共55个卵巢,其中25/55卵巢高级别浆液性癌(45%),其他上皮性癌12例(22%),非上皮性癌8例(14%),交界性肿瘤10例(18%)。高级别浆液性癌的增强与其他浸润性卵巢恶性肿瘤无显著差异(P = 0.865;P = 0.353)。浸润性卵巢恶性肿瘤的增强高于交界性卵巢恶性肿瘤,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.102;P = 0.072)。结论。在临床进行的对比增强MRI研究中,高级别浆液性卵巢癌的增强与其他卵巢恶性肿瘤没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of treatment with ginger on the severity of premenstrual syndrome symptoms. Knowledge and Attitude of Nigerian Pregnant Women towards Antenatal Exercise: A Cross-Sectional Survey. The role of androgen hormones in early follicular development. Labour Analgesia When Epidural Is Not a Choice: Tramadol versus Pentazocine. Major congenital malformations in barbados: the prevalence, the pattern, and the resulting morbidity and mortality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1