Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus diagnostics: state of the art.

Expert opinion on medical diagnostics Pub Date : 2012-11-01 Epub Date: 2012-07-28 DOI:10.1517/17530059.2012.709233
Ellen Jo Baron, Fred C Tenover
{"title":"Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus diagnostics: state of the art.","authors":"Ellen Jo Baron,&nbsp;Fred C Tenover","doi":"10.1517/17530059.2012.709233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is among the most common causes of community- and healthcare-acquired infections, accounting for > 80,000 invasive infections in the United States in 2010 according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Active Bacterial Core Surveillance data. Control and treatment of MRSA depend on reliable identification, which is challenging. This article reviews the current status of detection and identification of MRSA.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Publications since 2001, guidelines from the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, common microbiology laboratory practices for identification and characterization of MRSA in human samples, and recent publications that assessed patient care outcomes of various detection and intervention strategies were surveyed for this review.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Given the predilection of Staphylococcus aureus to modify its genetic characteristics, thereby enabling the species to stay one step ahead of laboratory detection systems, phenotypic methods for detection of antibiotic resistance mechanisms, especially those directed against the beta-lactam family, will continue to be required, in some situations, for the foreseeable future. Molecular methods are now the gold standard for surveillance, yielding higher sensitivity than the slower, culture-based methods. The newer molecular surveillance methods for detecting methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) colonization and for rapid and accurate identification of S. aureus from growth in culture systems have revolutionized patient care, enabling rapid interventions that lead to better individual patient outcomes, such as fewer postsurgical site infections, and better overall institutional infection control (fewer healthcare-associated MRSA infections).</p>","PeriodicalId":72996,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","volume":"6 6","pages":"585-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1517/17530059.2012.709233","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1517/17530059.2012.709233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is among the most common causes of community- and healthcare-acquired infections, accounting for > 80,000 invasive infections in the United States in 2010 according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Active Bacterial Core Surveillance data. Control and treatment of MRSA depend on reliable identification, which is challenging. This article reviews the current status of detection and identification of MRSA.

Areas covered: Publications since 2001, guidelines from the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, common microbiology laboratory practices for identification and characterization of MRSA in human samples, and recent publications that assessed patient care outcomes of various detection and intervention strategies were surveyed for this review.

Expert opinion: Given the predilection of Staphylococcus aureus to modify its genetic characteristics, thereby enabling the species to stay one step ahead of laboratory detection systems, phenotypic methods for detection of antibiotic resistance mechanisms, especially those directed against the beta-lactam family, will continue to be required, in some situations, for the foreseeable future. Molecular methods are now the gold standard for surveillance, yielding higher sensitivity than the slower, culture-based methods. The newer molecular surveillance methods for detecting methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) colonization and for rapid and accurate identification of S. aureus from growth in culture systems have revolutionized patient care, enabling rapid interventions that lead to better individual patient outcomes, such as fewer postsurgical site infections, and better overall institutional infection control (fewer healthcare-associated MRSA infections).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌诊断:最新进展。
导读:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是社区和医疗保健获得性感染的最常见原因之一,根据疾病控制和预防中心的活性细菌核心监测数据,2010年美国有超过80,000例侵袭性感染。MRSA的控制和治疗依赖于可靠的鉴定,这是具有挑战性的。本文综述了MRSA的检测和鉴定现状。涵盖领域:自2001年以来的出版物,临床实验室标准研究所和欧洲抗微生物药敏试验委员会的指南,人类样本中MRSA鉴定和表征的常见微生物实验室实践,以及评估各种检测和干预策略的患者护理结果的最新出版物,为本综述进行了调查。专家意见:鉴于金黄色葡萄球菌倾向于改变其遗传特征,从而使该物种比实验室检测系统领先一步,在可预见的未来,在某些情况下,将继续需要表型方法来检测抗生素耐药性机制,特别是针对β -内酰胺家族的方法。分子方法现在是监测的金标准,比速度较慢的基于培养的方法具有更高的灵敏度。用于检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)定植和快速准确识别培养系统中金黄色葡萄球菌生长的较新的分子监测方法彻底改变了患者护理,使快速干预能够带来更好的个体患者结果,例如减少术后部位感染,更好的整体机构感染控制(减少医疗保健相关的MRSA感染)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simtomax, a novel point of care test for coeliac disease. Diagnosis of skeletal muscle channelopathies. Review of latent and lytic phase biomarkers in Kaposi's sarcoma. The precision study: examining the inter- and intra-assay variability of replicate measurements of BGStar, iBGStar and 12 other blood glucose monitors. Novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in esophageal cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1