Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in India: a systematic review.

JRSM short reports Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2012-12-31 DOI:10.1258/shorts.2012.012029
Ailsa J McKay, Mahesh Pa, Raju Kk Patel, Azeem Majeed
{"title":"Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in India: a systematic review.","authors":"Ailsa J McKay,&nbsp;Mahesh Pa,&nbsp;Raju Kk Patel,&nbsp;Azeem Majeed","doi":"10.1258/shorts.2012.012029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Chronic diseases are fast becoming the largest health burden in India. Despite this, their management in India has not been well studied. We aimed to systematically review the nature and efficacy of current management strategies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, IndMED, CENTRAL and CINAHL), journal hand-searches, scanning of reference lists and contact with experts to identify studies for systematic review. We did not review management strategies aimed at chronic diseases more generally, nor management of acute exacerbations. Due to the heterogeneity of reviewed studies, meta-analysis was not appropriate. Thus, narrative methods were used.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>India.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All adult populations resident in India.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>1. Trialled interventions and outcomes 2. Extent and efficacy of current management strategies 3. Above outcomes by subgroup.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found information regarding current management - particularly regarding the implementation of national guidelines and primary prevention - to be minimal. This led to difficulty in interpreting studies of management strategies, which were varied and generally of positive effect. Data regarding current management outcomes were very few.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current understanding of management strategies for COPD in India is limited due to a lack of published data. Determination of the extent of current use of management guidelines, availability and use of treatment, and current primary prevention strategies would be useful. This would also provide evidence on which to interpret existing and future studies of management outcomes and novel interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":89182,"journal":{"name":"JRSM short reports","volume":"3 12","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1258/shorts.2012.012029","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1258/shorts.2012.012029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic diseases are fast becoming the largest health burden in India. Despite this, their management in India has not been well studied. We aimed to systematically review the nature and efficacy of current management strategies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in India.

Methods: We used database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, IndMED, CENTRAL and CINAHL), journal hand-searches, scanning of reference lists and contact with experts to identify studies for systematic review. We did not review management strategies aimed at chronic diseases more generally, nor management of acute exacerbations. Due to the heterogeneity of reviewed studies, meta-analysis was not appropriate. Thus, narrative methods were used.

Setting: India.

Participants: All adult populations resident in India.

Main outcome measures: 1. Trialled interventions and outcomes 2. Extent and efficacy of current management strategies 3. Above outcomes by subgroup.

Results: We found information regarding current management - particularly regarding the implementation of national guidelines and primary prevention - to be minimal. This led to difficulty in interpreting studies of management strategies, which were varied and generally of positive effect. Data regarding current management outcomes were very few.

Conclusions: The current understanding of management strategies for COPD in India is limited due to a lack of published data. Determination of the extent of current use of management guidelines, availability and use of treatment, and current primary prevention strategies would be useful. This would also provide evidence on which to interpret existing and future studies of management outcomes and novel interventions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度慢性阻塞性肺疾病的管理:系统综述。
目标:慢性病正迅速成为印度最大的健康负担。尽管如此,它们在印度的管理还没有得到很好的研究。我们旨在系统地回顾印度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)当前管理策略的性质和疗效。方法:我们使用数据库检索(MEDLINE、EMBASE、IndMED、CENTRAL和CINAHL)、期刊手检索、扫描参考文献列表和联系专家来确定需要进行系统评价的研究。我们没有审查针对慢性疾病更普遍的管理策略,也没有审查急性加重的管理策略。由于所回顾研究的异质性,荟萃分析不合适。因此,采用了叙事的方法。设置:印度。参与者:居住在印度的所有成年人口。主要观察指标:1。试验干预措施和结果当前管理策略的程度和有效性以上结果按亚组分列。结果:我们发现关于当前管理的信息-特别是关于国家指南和一级预防的实施-很少。这导致难以解释各种各样的管理战略研究,这些研究通常具有积极作用。关于当前管理结果的数据很少。结论:由于缺乏已发表的数据,目前对印度COPD管理策略的了解有限。确定目前使用管理指南的程度、治疗的可得性和使用情况以及目前的初级预防战略将是有用的。这也将为解释现有和未来关于管理结果和新干预措施的研究提供证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, skills and attitude of evidence-based medicine among obstetrics and gynaecology trainees: a questionnaire survey. Severe inflammatory response and vasculitis leading to quadruple limb amputations. A rare case of submandibular abscess complicated by stroke. Are the pituitary gonadotrophins determinants of complete molar pregnancy? An investigation using the method of least squares. Lumbar puncture, chronic fatigue syndrome and idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1