Nurse practitioners in postoperative cardiac surgery: are they effective?

Catherine L Goldie, Natasha Prodan-Bhalla, Martha Mackay
{"title":"Nurse practitioners in postoperative cardiac surgery: are they effective?","authors":"Catherine L Goldie,&nbsp;Natasha Prodan-Bhalla,&nbsp;Martha Mackay","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High demand for acute care nurse practitioners (ACNPs) in Canadian postoperative cardiac surgery settings has outpaced methodologically rigorous research to support the role.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of ACNP-led care to hospitalist-led care in a postoperative cardiac surgery unit in a Canadian, university-affiliated, tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled for urgent or elective coronary artery bypass and/or valvular surgery were randomly assigned to either ACNP-led (n=22) or hospitalist-led (n=81) postoperative care. Both ACNPs and hospitalists worked in collaboration with a cardiac surgeon. Outcome variables included length of hospital stay, hospital readmission rate, postoperative complications, adherence to follow-up appointments, attendance at cardiac rehabilitation and both patient and health care team satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between groups except more patients in the ACNP-led group had had surgery on an urgent basis (p < or = 0.01), and had undergone more complicated surgical procedures (p < or =0.01). After discharge, more patients in the hospitalist-led group had visited their family doctor within a week (p < or =0.02) and measures of satisfaction relating to teaching, answering questions, listening and pain management were higher in the ACNP-led group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications: </strong>Although challenges in recruitment yielded a lower than anticipated sample size, this study contributes to our knowledge of the ACNP role in postoperative cardiac surgery. Our findings provide support for the ACNP role in this setting as patients who received care from an ACNP had similar outcomes to hospitalist-led care and reported greater satisfaction in some measures of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":77057,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of cardiovascular nursing = Journal canadien en soins infirmiers cardio-vasculaires","volume":"22 4","pages":"8-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of cardiovascular nursing = Journal canadien en soins infirmiers cardio-vasculaires","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High demand for acute care nurse practitioners (ACNPs) in Canadian postoperative cardiac surgery settings has outpaced methodologically rigorous research to support the role.

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of ACNP-led care to hospitalist-led care in a postoperative cardiac surgery unit in a Canadian, university-affiliated, tertiary care hospital.

Methods: Patients scheduled for urgent or elective coronary artery bypass and/or valvular surgery were randomly assigned to either ACNP-led (n=22) or hospitalist-led (n=81) postoperative care. Both ACNPs and hospitalists worked in collaboration with a cardiac surgeon. Outcome variables included length of hospital stay, hospital readmission rate, postoperative complications, adherence to follow-up appointments, attendance at cardiac rehabilitation and both patient and health care team satisfaction.

Results: Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between groups except more patients in the ACNP-led group had had surgery on an urgent basis (p < or = 0.01), and had undergone more complicated surgical procedures (p < or =0.01). After discharge, more patients in the hospitalist-led group had visited their family doctor within a week (p < or =0.02) and measures of satisfaction relating to teaching, answering questions, listening and pain management were higher in the ACNP-led group.

Conclusion/implications: Although challenges in recruitment yielded a lower than anticipated sample size, this study contributes to our knowledge of the ACNP role in postoperative cardiac surgery. Our findings provide support for the ACNP role in this setting as patients who received care from an ACNP had similar outcomes to hospitalist-led care and reported greater satisfaction in some measures of care.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏手术后护理人员:是否有效?
背景:加拿大心脏手术后对急性护理护士从业人员(ACNPs)的高需求已经超过了方法学上严格的研究来支持这一角色。目的:比较加拿大某大学附属三级医院心脏外科术后acnp主导护理与住院医生主导护理的有效性。方法:计划进行紧急或选择性冠状动脉搭桥和/或瓣膜手术的患者随机分配到acnp主导(n=22)或医院主导(n=81)的术后护理。ACNPs和医院医生都与心脏外科医生合作。结果变量包括住院时间、再入院率、术后并发症、随访预约的依从性、心脏康复的出席率以及患者和卫生保健团队的满意度。结果:两组间的基线人口学特征相似,但acnp组有更多的患者进行了紧急手术(p <或=0.01),并经历了更复杂的手术(p <或=0.01)。出院后,医师领导组一周内就诊家庭医生的患者较多(p < or =0.02), acnp领导组在教学、回答问题、倾听和疼痛管理方面的满意度较高。结论/意义:尽管在招募方面的挑战产生了低于预期的样本量,但本研究有助于我们了解ACNP在心脏术后手术中的作用。我们的研究结果为ACNP在这种情况下的作用提供了支持,因为接受ACNP护理的患者与医院医生主导的护理结果相似,并且在某些护理措施中报告了更高的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mind the Gap: Women and Acute Myocardial Infarctions-An Integrated Review of Literature. Augmentation Index and Pulse Wave Velocity--Agreement of Two Indicators and Relationships to Blood Pressures. Easing the Economic Burden of Atrial Fibrillation: Making the Case for a Structured Clinical Nurse Specialist-Led Outpatient Clinic. A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Development and Implementation of Best Practices Usng an Innovative Clinical Pathway for the Management of Cardiac Arrest Patients with Cognitive Dysfunction: A Case Study. Risk Factors and Best Practices for the Prevention of Post-Cardiac Surgery Surgical Site Infections in a Tertiary Care Centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1