Chairside intraoral qualitative somatosensory testing: reliability and comparison between patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy controls.

Lene Baad-Hansen, Maria Pigg, Susanne Elmasry Ivanovic, Hanan Faris, Thomas List, Mark Drangsholt, Peter Svensson
{"title":"Chairside intraoral qualitative somatosensory testing: reliability and comparison between patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy controls.","authors":"Lene Baad-Hansen,&nbsp;Maria Pigg,&nbsp;Susanne Elmasry Ivanovic,&nbsp;Hanan Faris,&nbsp;Thomas List,&nbsp;Mark Drangsholt,&nbsp;Peter Svensson","doi":"10.11607/jop.1062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess intraoral inter- and intraexaminer reliability of three qualitative measures of intraoral somatosensory function and to compare these measures between patients with atypical odontalgia (AO) and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one AO patients and 47 healthy controls participated. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability was tested on a subgroup of 46 subjects (25 AO; 21 healthy). Sensitivity to touch, cold, and pinprick stimuli was evaluated on the painful gingival site and the corresponding contralateral site in AO patients, and bilaterally on the gingiva of the first maxillary premolars in controls. Patients were asked to report hypersensitivity, hyposensitivity, or normal sensitivity to stimuli on the painful site compared with the nonpainful site. Kappa values were calculated, and chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare frequencies between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kappa values ranged between 0.63 and 0.75. The frequency of hypersensitivity to either modality was significantly higher in patients (29% to 61%) than in controls (9% to 17%) (P < .015), whereas reports of hyposensitivity were similar between groups (2% to 16%) (P > .057). Only 3.2% of the AO patients had no reports of abnormal sensitivity on any of the tests, compared with 59.6% of the healthy subjects (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoral qualitative somatosensory testing can detect intraoral sensory disturbances in AO patients, and the reliability is sufficient for initial screening of orofacial somatosensory function.</p>","PeriodicalId":16649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orofacial pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/jop.1062","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orofacial pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

Aims: To assess intraoral inter- and intraexaminer reliability of three qualitative measures of intraoral somatosensory function and to compare these measures between patients with atypical odontalgia (AO) and healthy controls.

Methods: Thirty-one AO patients and 47 healthy controls participated. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability was tested on a subgroup of 46 subjects (25 AO; 21 healthy). Sensitivity to touch, cold, and pinprick stimuli was evaluated on the painful gingival site and the corresponding contralateral site in AO patients, and bilaterally on the gingiva of the first maxillary premolars in controls. Patients were asked to report hypersensitivity, hyposensitivity, or normal sensitivity to stimuli on the painful site compared with the nonpainful site. Kappa values were calculated, and chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare frequencies between groups.

Results: Kappa values ranged between 0.63 and 0.75. The frequency of hypersensitivity to either modality was significantly higher in patients (29% to 61%) than in controls (9% to 17%) (P < .015), whereas reports of hyposensitivity were similar between groups (2% to 16%) (P > .057). Only 3.2% of the AO patients had no reports of abnormal sensitivity on any of the tests, compared with 59.6% of the healthy subjects (P < .001).

Conclusion: Intraoral qualitative somatosensory testing can detect intraoral sensory disturbances in AO patients, and the reliability is sufficient for initial screening of orofacial somatosensory function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椅边口腔内定性体感试验:不典型牙痛患者与健康对照的可靠性和比较。
目的:评估三种口腔内体感觉功能定性测量的可靠性,并比较非典型牙痛(AO)患者和健康对照者的这些测量。方法:31例AO患者和47例健康对照。在46名受试者的亚组(25 AO;21日健康)。在AO患者疼痛的牙龈部位和对侧相应部位,以及对照组的双侧上颌第一前磨牙牙龈对触摸、寒冷和针刺刺激的敏感性进行评估。患者被要求报告疼痛部位与非疼痛部位对刺激的超敏反应、低敏反应或正常反应。计算Kappa值,使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验比较组间频率。结果:Kappa值在0.63 ~ 0.75之间。患者对任何一种方式的超敏反应频率(29%至61%)明显高于对照组(9%至17%)(P < 0.015),而两组之间的低敏反应报告相似(2%至16%)(P > 0.057)。只有3.2%的AO患者未报告任何测试的异常敏感性,而健康受试者的这一比例为59.6% (P < 0.001)。结论:口内定性体感测试可检测AO患者的口内感觉障碍,可靠性足以初步筛查口面部体感功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of orofacial pain
Journal of orofacial pain 医学-牙科与口腔外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Way forward Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating intraoral orthopedic appliances for temporomandibular disorders. Neuroplasticity in the adaptation to prosthodontic treatment. Temporomandibular disorder pain after whiplash trauma: a systematic review. Why seek treatment for temporomandibular disorder pain complaints? A study based on semi-structured interviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1