Feasibility of an online mindfulness program for stress management--a randomized, controlled trial.

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Annals of Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2013-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s12160-013-9490-x
Thomas J Morledge, Didier Allexandre, Emily Fox, Alex Z Fu, Mitchell K Higashi, Denise T Kruzikas, Sissi V Pham, Pat Ray Reese
{"title":"Feasibility of an online mindfulness program for stress management--a randomized, controlled trial.","authors":"Thomas J Morledge,&nbsp;Didier Allexandre,&nbsp;Emily Fox,&nbsp;Alex Z Fu,&nbsp;Mitchell K Higashi,&nbsp;Denise T Kruzikas,&nbsp;Sissi V Pham,&nbsp;Pat Ray Reese","doi":"10.1007/s12160-013-9490-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic stress affects many Americans. Stress management programs may be prohibitively expensive or have limited access.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to determine feasibility of an 8-week Internet-based stress management program (ISM) based on mindfulness principles in reducing stress in a 12-week, parallel, randomized, controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomly allocated to ISM, ISM plus online message board (ISM+), or control groups. Perceived stress, mindfulness, self-transcendence, psychological well-being, vitality, and quality of life were measured at baseline, week 8, and week 12 using standard validated questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ISM and ISM+ groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements compared with control on all measures except vitality and physical health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ISM program effectively and sustainably reduced measures of stress. The magnitude of improvement is comparable to traditional mindfulness programs, although fewer participants were engaged. This feasibility study provides strong support for online stress management programs, which increase access at a fraction of cost of traditional programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7939,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Behavioral Medicine","volume":"46 2","pages":"137-48"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12160-013-9490-x","citationCount":"162","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9490-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 162

Abstract

Background: Chronic stress affects many Americans. Stress management programs may be prohibitively expensive or have limited access.

Purpose: This study aims to determine feasibility of an 8-week Internet-based stress management program (ISM) based on mindfulness principles in reducing stress in a 12-week, parallel, randomized, controlled trial.

Methods: Participants were randomly allocated to ISM, ISM plus online message board (ISM+), or control groups. Perceived stress, mindfulness, self-transcendence, psychological well-being, vitality, and quality of life were measured at baseline, week 8, and week 12 using standard validated questionnaires.

Results: ISM and ISM+ groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements compared with control on all measures except vitality and physical health.

Conclusions: The ISM program effectively and sustainably reduced measures of stress. The magnitude of improvement is comparable to traditional mindfulness programs, although fewer participants were engaged. This feasibility study provides strong support for online stress management programs, which increase access at a fraction of cost of traditional programs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项用于压力管理的在线正念计划的可行性——一项随机对照试验。
背景:慢性压力影响着许多美国人。压力管理项目可能非常昂贵,或者使用渠道有限。目的:本研究旨在通过一项为期12周的平行、随机、对照试验,确定基于正念原则的8周网络压力管理计划(ISM)在减轻压力方面的可行性。方法:将参与者随机分为ISM组、ISM+在线留言板组和对照组。在基线、第8周和第12周使用标准有效问卷测量感知压力、正念、自我超越、心理健康、活力和生活质量。结果:与对照组相比,ISM组和ISM+组在除活力和身体健康外的所有指标上均有统计学显著改善。结论:ISM项目有效且可持续地减少了应激措施。改善的幅度与传统的正念项目相当,尽管参与的参与者较少。这项可行性研究为在线压力管理项目提供了强有力的支持,它以传统项目的一小部分成本增加了访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Annals of Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Annals of Behavioral Medicine aims to foster the exchange of knowledge derived from the disciplines involved in the field of behavioral medicine, and the integration of biological, psychosocial, and behavioral factors and principles as they relate to such areas as health promotion, disease prevention, risk factor modification, disease progression, adjustment and adaptation to physical disorders, and rehabilitation. To achieve these goals, much of the journal is devoted to the publication of original empirical articles including reports of randomized controlled trials, observational studies, or other basic and clinical investigations. Integrative reviews of the evidence for the application of behavioral interventions in health care will also be provided. .
期刊最新文献
Behavioral and Psychosocial Dynamics in Diabetes Management: A Path Analysis to Examine the Influence of Acculturation in Arab Immigrant Communities. Cognitive Health Benefits of Everyday Physical Activity in a Diverse Sample of Middle-Aged Adults. Optimizing the Use of Personal Values to Promote Medication Adherence: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Affective and Behavioral Responses to Theory-Driven Domain Congruent Versus Incongruent Values Approaches. Associations Among Experiences With Racial Discrimination, Religion/Spirituality, and Cigarette Smoking Among African American Adults: The Jackson Heart Study. Correction to: Caregiver Experiences With an Internet-Delivered Insomnia Intervention: SHUTi-CARE Trial Primary Qualitative Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1