Transfer and persistence studies of inorganic and organic gunshot residues using synthetic skin membranes

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Forensic Chemistry Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.forc.2023.100498
Courtney Vander Pyl , Kourtney Dalzell , Korina Menking-Hoggatt , Thomas Ledergerber , Luis Arroyo , Tatiana Trejos
{"title":"Transfer and persistence studies of inorganic and organic gunshot residues using synthetic skin membranes","authors":"Courtney Vander Pyl ,&nbsp;Kourtney Dalzell ,&nbsp;Korina Menking-Hoggatt ,&nbsp;Thomas Ledergerber ,&nbsp;Luis Arroyo ,&nbsp;Tatiana Trejos","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2023.100498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The complex nature of gunshot residue (GSR) transfer and persistence introduces challenges and skepticism in its evidential value. Therefore, this work evaluates the behavior and movement of inorganic and organic gunshot residues to assist in the evidence interpretation. The study encompassed over 650 samples, including 247 collections from human skin after firing a gun and 405 synthetic skin and fabric substrates after depositing a characterized pGSR/OGSR standard. Transfer and persistence experiments were evaluated on different substrates (hands, ears, nostrils, forehead, hair, fabrics, and synthetic skin), at different times after firing (0 to 6 h), and common post-shooting activities (rubbing hands, handshaking, running, washing hands and fabrics). Ground truth knowledge of particle counts and analyte concentrations was used to calculate the recovery for inorganic and organic constituents from clothing and a synthetic skin membrane (StratM®). Authentic shooter skin samples were compared to synthetic skin to establish the validity of skin-substitute models. During controlled experiments, inorganic particles persisted longer than OGSR on inactive samples (9% and &lt; 25% loss at 6 hrs, respectively), but inorganic particles were more prone to secondary transfer than OGSR (up to 35% vs. 0% transfer, respectively). High percentages of particles were lost during vigorous activities like washing hands (99% loss) or rubbing hands (55% loss). In comparison, less loss was observed during the same studies for OGSR (&lt;21%). This study offers a deeper understanding of gunshot residue transfer and persistence mechanisms that can assist analysts and investigators in improving sample collection and interpretation of evidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170923000346","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The complex nature of gunshot residue (GSR) transfer and persistence introduces challenges and skepticism in its evidential value. Therefore, this work evaluates the behavior and movement of inorganic and organic gunshot residues to assist in the evidence interpretation. The study encompassed over 650 samples, including 247 collections from human skin after firing a gun and 405 synthetic skin and fabric substrates after depositing a characterized pGSR/OGSR standard. Transfer and persistence experiments were evaluated on different substrates (hands, ears, nostrils, forehead, hair, fabrics, and synthetic skin), at different times after firing (0 to 6 h), and common post-shooting activities (rubbing hands, handshaking, running, washing hands and fabrics). Ground truth knowledge of particle counts and analyte concentrations was used to calculate the recovery for inorganic and organic constituents from clothing and a synthetic skin membrane (StratM®). Authentic shooter skin samples were compared to synthetic skin to establish the validity of skin-substitute models. During controlled experiments, inorganic particles persisted longer than OGSR on inactive samples (9% and < 25% loss at 6 hrs, respectively), but inorganic particles were more prone to secondary transfer than OGSR (up to 35% vs. 0% transfer, respectively). High percentages of particles were lost during vigorous activities like washing hands (99% loss) or rubbing hands (55% loss). In comparison, less loss was observed during the same studies for OGSR (<21%). This study offers a deeper understanding of gunshot residue transfer and persistence mechanisms that can assist analysts and investigators in improving sample collection and interpretation of evidence.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无机和有机枪弹残留物在合成皮肤膜上的转移和持久性研究
射击残留物(GSR)转移和持续的复杂性对其证据价值提出了挑战和质疑。因此,本研究评估了无机和有机枪击残留物的行为和运动,以协助证据解释。该研究涵盖了650多个样本,其中247个样本来自射击后的人体皮肤,405个样本来自沉积了表征的pGSR/OGSR标准后的合成皮肤和织物基板。在不同的基底(手、耳朵、鼻孔、前额、头发、织物和合成皮肤)、射击后的不同时间(0 ~ 6 h)和常见的射击后活动(搓手、握手、跑步、洗手和织物)上评估转移和持久性实验。使用颗粒计数和分析物浓度的基础真相知识来计算衣服和合成皮肤膜(StratM®)中无机和有机成分的回收率。将枪手真实皮肤样本与合成皮肤样本进行比较,以确定皮肤替代模型的有效性。在对照实验中,无机颗粒在非活性样品上的持续时间比OGSR长(9%和<但无机颗粒比OGSR更容易发生二次转移(分别高达35%和0%)。在剧烈活动中,如洗手(损失99%)或搓手(损失55%),颗粒的损失比例很高。相比之下,在相同的研究中,OGSR的损失较少(21%)。该研究提供了对枪击残留物转移和持续机制的更深入理解,可以帮助分析人员和调查人员改进样本收集和证据解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Chemistry
Forensic Chemistry CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
14.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.
期刊最新文献
Development and evaluation of a nontargeted electrochemical surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (EC-SERS) screening method applied to forensic seized drug casework samples Observation of chromatographic differences by non-specialist viewers for one-dimensional gas chromatography and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography output Assessment of two benzylation strategies for the analysis of nerve-agent derived ethyl- and pinacolyl methyl phosphonic acids in sandy loam soil by GC–MS Portable near-infrared detection to replace color tests in an analytical scheme for forensic drug identification Halogen-bond mediated charge transfer for visual competitive colorimetric detection of fentanyl
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1