New development in the diagnosis of dengue infections.

Expert opinion on medical diagnostics Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-08-23 DOI:10.1517/17530059.2012.718759
Anusyah Rathakrishnan, Shamala Devi Sekaran
{"title":"New development in the diagnosis of dengue infections.","authors":"Anusyah Rathakrishnan,&nbsp;Shamala Devi Sekaran","doi":"10.1517/17530059.2012.718759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dengue is of major concern around the world. Having no pathognomonic features that reliably distinguish it from other febrile illnesses, laboratory diagnosis is important for confirmation. Ideally, a dengue diagnostic test should be sensitive, specific and applicable from the onset of disease to 10 days post-infection.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this review, the pro and cons of currently available diagnostic arrays as well as evaluations that have been conducted by numerous groups using both in-house and commercialized kits were assessed and reviewed. We also probed into the challenges and hurdles of applying these assays worldwide. This review also glimpsed at newer technologies that may be invaluable in the future of dengue diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>To diagnose dengue, an understanding of the complex immune responses and the clinical features of this disease is essential. The MAC-ELISA currently remains the assay of choice but needs further evaluation and confirmation. Viral RT-PCR and NS1 have gained interest but their inconsistencies and great variability are of concern. Combinations of these tests have improved sensitivity but specificity issues still exist. Consequently, the favorable method of diagnosing dengue currently is to run multiple tests or obtain a paired sample so that more than one parameter is detected or a rising titer is demonstrated.</p>","PeriodicalId":72996,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","volume":"7 1","pages":"99-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1517/17530059.2012.718759","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1517/17530059.2012.718759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Introduction: Dengue is of major concern around the world. Having no pathognomonic features that reliably distinguish it from other febrile illnesses, laboratory diagnosis is important for confirmation. Ideally, a dengue diagnostic test should be sensitive, specific and applicable from the onset of disease to 10 days post-infection.

Areas covered: In this review, the pro and cons of currently available diagnostic arrays as well as evaluations that have been conducted by numerous groups using both in-house and commercialized kits were assessed and reviewed. We also probed into the challenges and hurdles of applying these assays worldwide. This review also glimpsed at newer technologies that may be invaluable in the future of dengue diagnostics.

Expert opinion: To diagnose dengue, an understanding of the complex immune responses and the clinical features of this disease is essential. The MAC-ELISA currently remains the assay of choice but needs further evaluation and confirmation. Viral RT-PCR and NS1 have gained interest but their inconsistencies and great variability are of concern. Combinations of these tests have improved sensitivity but specificity issues still exist. Consequently, the favorable method of diagnosing dengue currently is to run multiple tests or obtain a paired sample so that more than one parameter is detected or a rising titer is demonstrated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
登革热感染诊断的新进展。
登革热是全世界关注的主要疾病。由于没有可靠的病理特征将其与其他发热性疾病区分开来,因此实验室诊断对确诊很重要。理想情况下,登革热诊断测试应该敏感、特异,并适用于从发病到感染后10天。涵盖领域:在本次审查中,评估和审查了目前可用的诊断阵列的利弊,以及许多小组使用内部和商业化工具包进行的评估。我们还探讨了在全球范围内应用这些检测的挑战和障碍。这篇综述还概述了在登革热诊断的未来可能非常宝贵的新技术。专家意见:为了诊断登革热,了解这种疾病的复杂免疫反应和临床特征是必不可少的。MAC-ELISA目前仍是首选的检测方法,但需要进一步评估和确认。病毒RT-PCR和NS1引起了人们的兴趣,但它们的不一致性和巨大的可变性令人担忧。这些测试的组合提高了灵敏度,但特异性问题仍然存在。因此,目前诊断登革热的有利方法是进行多次测试或获得成对样本,以便检测到多个参数或证明滴度上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simtomax, a novel point of care test for coeliac disease. Diagnosis of skeletal muscle channelopathies. Review of latent and lytic phase biomarkers in Kaposi's sarcoma. The precision study: examining the inter- and intra-assay variability of replicate measurements of BGStar, iBGStar and 12 other blood glucose monitors. Novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in esophageal cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1