LACE+ index: extension of a validated index to predict early death or urgent readmission after hospital discharge using administrative data.

Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal Pub Date : 2012-07-19 Print Date: 2012-01-01
Carl van Walraven, Jenna Wong, Alan J Forster
{"title":"LACE+ index: extension of a validated index to predict early death or urgent readmission after hospital discharge using administrative data.","authors":"Carl van Walraven,&nbsp;Jenna Wong,&nbsp;Alan J Forster","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Death or urgent readmission after hospital discharge is a common adverse event that can be used to compare outcomes of care between institutions. To accurately adjust for risk and to allow for interhospital comparisons of readmission rates, we used administrative data to derive and internally validate an extension of the LACE index, a previously validated index for 30-day death or urgent readmission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly selected 500 000 medical and surgical patients discharged to the community from any Ontario hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2009. We derived a logistic regression model on 250 000 randomly selected patients from this group and modified the final model into an index scoring system, the LACE+ index. We internally validated the LACE+ index using data from the remaining 250 000 patients and compared its performance with that of the original LACE index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within 30 days of discharge to the community, 33 825 (6.8%) of the patients had died or had been urgently readmitted. In addition to the variables included in the LACE index (length of stay in hospital [L], acuity of admission [A], comorbidity [C] and emergency department utilization in the 6 months before admission [E]), the LACE+ index incorporated patient age and sex, teaching status of the discharge hospital, acute diagnoses and procedures performed during the index admission, number of days on alternative level of care during the index admission, and number of elective and urgent admissions to hospital in the year before the index admission. The LACE+ index was highly discriminative (C statistic 0.771, 95% confidence interval 0.767-0.775), was well calibrated across most of its range of scores and had a model performance that exceeded that of the LACE index.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The LACE+ index can be used to predict the risk of postdischarge death or urgent readmission on the basis of administrative data for the Ontario population. Its performance exceeds that of the LACE index, and it allows analysts to accurately estimate the risk of important postdischarge outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"6 3","pages":"e80-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/28/OpenMed-06-e80.PMC3659212.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Death or urgent readmission after hospital discharge is a common adverse event that can be used to compare outcomes of care between institutions. To accurately adjust for risk and to allow for interhospital comparisons of readmission rates, we used administrative data to derive and internally validate an extension of the LACE index, a previously validated index for 30-day death or urgent readmission.

Methods: We randomly selected 500 000 medical and surgical patients discharged to the community from any Ontario hospital between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2009. We derived a logistic regression model on 250 000 randomly selected patients from this group and modified the final model into an index scoring system, the LACE+ index. We internally validated the LACE+ index using data from the remaining 250 000 patients and compared its performance with that of the original LACE index.

Results: Within 30 days of discharge to the community, 33 825 (6.8%) of the patients had died or had been urgently readmitted. In addition to the variables included in the LACE index (length of stay in hospital [L], acuity of admission [A], comorbidity [C] and emergency department utilization in the 6 months before admission [E]), the LACE+ index incorporated patient age and sex, teaching status of the discharge hospital, acute diagnoses and procedures performed during the index admission, number of days on alternative level of care during the index admission, and number of elective and urgent admissions to hospital in the year before the index admission. The LACE+ index was highly discriminative (C statistic 0.771, 95% confidence interval 0.767-0.775), was well calibrated across most of its range of scores and had a model performance that exceeded that of the LACE index.

Interpretation: The LACE+ index can be used to predict the risk of postdischarge death or urgent readmission on the basis of administrative data for the Ontario population. Its performance exceeds that of the LACE index, and it allows analysts to accurately estimate the risk of important postdischarge outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LACE+指数:利用行政数据扩展了一个有效的指数,以预测早期死亡或出院后紧急再入院。
背景:出院后死亡或紧急再入院是常见的不良事件,可用于比较机构之间的护理结果。为了准确调整风险并允许医院间再入院率的比较,我们使用行政数据推导并内部验证了LACE指数的扩展,LACE指数是先前验证过的30天死亡或紧急再入院指数。方法:我们随机选择2003年4月1日至2009年3月31日期间从安大略省任何一家医院出院的50万名内科和外科患者。我们对该组随机选取的25万例患者建立了logistic回归模型,并将最终模型修改为一个指标评分系统,即LACE+指数。我们使用剩余25万例患者的数据对LACE+指数进行了内部验证,并将其性能与原始LACE指数进行了比较。结果:出院后30 d内死亡或紧急再入院患者33 825例(6.8%)。除了纳入LACE指数的变量(住院时间[L]、入院视力[A]、合并症[C]和入院前6个月急诊科使用率[E])外,LACE+指数还包括患者的年龄和性别、出院医院的教学状况、指标入院期间的急性诊断和手术、指标入院期间的替代护理天数、并在指标入院前一年择期和急症住院人数。LACE+指数具有很强的判别性(C统计量为0.771,95%置信区间为0.767-0.775),在其大部分分数范围内都进行了很好的校准,并且具有超过LACE指数的模型性能。解释:根据安大略省人口的行政数据,LACE+指数可用于预测出院后死亡或紧急再入院的风险。它的表现超过了LACE指数,它使分析师能够准确地估计重要的出院后结局的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Closing Open Medicine. Use of mental health care for nonpsychotic conditions by immigrants in different admission classes and by refugees in Ontario, Canada. Comparison of sampling methods for hard-to-reach francophone populations: yield and adequacy of advertisement and respondent-driven sampling. Pan-Canadian overpricing of medicines: a 6-country study of cost control for generic medicines. Dengue fever: a Wikipedia clinical review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1