Quantitative Proteomics via High Resolution MS Quantification: Capabilities and Limitations.

International journal of proteomics Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-04-23 DOI:10.1155/2013/674282
Richard E Higgs, Jon P Butler, Bomie Han, Michael D Knierman
{"title":"Quantitative Proteomics via High Resolution MS Quantification: Capabilities and Limitations.","authors":"Richard E Higgs,&nbsp;Jon P Butler,&nbsp;Bomie Han,&nbsp;Michael D Knierman","doi":"10.1155/2013/674282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent improvements in the mass accuracy and resolution of mass spectrometers have led to renewed interest in label-free quantification using data from the primary mass spectrum (MS1) acquired from data-dependent proteomics experiments. The capacity for higher specificity quantification of peptides from samples enriched for proteins of biological interest offers distinct advantages for hypothesis generating experiments relative to immunoassay detection methods or prespecified peptide ions measured by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) approaches. Here we describe an evaluation of different methods to post-process peptide level quantification information to support protein level inference. We characterize the methods by examining their ability to recover a known dilution of a standard protein in background matrices of varying complexity. Additionally, the MS1 quantification results are compared to a standard, targeted, MRM approach on the same samples under equivalent instrument conditions. We show the existence of multiple peptides with MS1 quantification sensitivity similar to the best MRM peptides for each of the background matrices studied. Based on these results we provide recommendations on preferred approaches to leveraging quantitative measurements of multiple peptides to improve protein level inference.</p>","PeriodicalId":73474,"journal":{"name":"International journal of proteomics","volume":"2013 ","pages":"674282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/674282","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/674282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Recent improvements in the mass accuracy and resolution of mass spectrometers have led to renewed interest in label-free quantification using data from the primary mass spectrum (MS1) acquired from data-dependent proteomics experiments. The capacity for higher specificity quantification of peptides from samples enriched for proteins of biological interest offers distinct advantages for hypothesis generating experiments relative to immunoassay detection methods or prespecified peptide ions measured by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) approaches. Here we describe an evaluation of different methods to post-process peptide level quantification information to support protein level inference. We characterize the methods by examining their ability to recover a known dilution of a standard protein in background matrices of varying complexity. Additionally, the MS1 quantification results are compared to a standard, targeted, MRM approach on the same samples under equivalent instrument conditions. We show the existence of multiple peptides with MS1 quantification sensitivity similar to the best MRM peptides for each of the background matrices studied. Based on these results we provide recommendations on preferred approaches to leveraging quantitative measurements of multiple peptides to improve protein level inference.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过高分辨率质谱定量的定量蛋白质组学:能力和局限性。
最近质谱仪的质量精度和分辨率的提高,重新引起了人们对使用从数据依赖的蛋白质组学实验中获得的主质谱(MS1)数据进行无标记定量的兴趣。相对于免疫分析检测方法或通过多反应监测(MRM)方法测量的预先指定的肽离子,从富含生物学兴趣蛋白的样品中对肽进行更高特异性定量的能力,为假设生成实验提供了明显的优势。在这里,我们描述了对不同方法的评价,以后处理肽水平量化信息,以支持蛋白质水平推断。我们通过检查它们在不同复杂性的背景基质中恢复已知稀释标准蛋白的能力来表征这些方法。此外,将MS1定量结果与同等仪器条件下对相同样品的标准、靶向、MRM方法进行比较。我们发现存在多个具有MS1定量敏感性的多肽,这些多肽与所研究的每个背景基质的最佳MRM多肽相似。基于这些结果,我们提供了推荐的首选方法,以利用多肽的定量测量,以提高蛋白质水平推断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Miniaturized Digestion and Extraction of Surface Proteins from Candida albicans following Treatment with Histatin 5 for Mass Spectrometry Analysis Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Differential Proteins in Response to Aqueous Extract of Quercus infectoria Gall in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Optimization of Urea Based Protein Extraction from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue for Shotgun Proteomics Label-Free Proteomic Analysis of Flavohemoglobin Deleted Strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae S-Nitrosylation Proteome Profile of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Human Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1