Can data extraction from general practitioners' electronic records be used to predict clinical outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes?

Michael Staff
{"title":"Can data extraction from general practitioners' electronic records be used to predict clinical outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes?","authors":"Michael Staff","doi":"10.14236/jhi.v20i2.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The review of clinical data extraction from electronic records is increasingly being used as a tool to assist general practitioners (GPs) manage their patients in Australia. Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a chronic condition cared for primarily in the general practice setting that lends itself to the application of tools in this area.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility of extracting data from a general practice medical record software package to predict clinically significant outcomes for patients with T2DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pilot study was conducted involving two large practices where routinely collected clinical data were extracted and inputted into the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model to predict life expectancy. An initial assessment of the completeness of data available was performed and then for those patients aged between 45 and 64 years with adequate data life expectancies estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1019 patients were identified as current patients with T2DM. There were sufficient data available on 40% of patients from one practice and 49% from the other to provide inputs into the UKPDS Outcomes Model. Predicted life expectancy was similar across the practices with women having longer life expectancies than men. Improved compliance with current management guidelines for glycaemic, lipid and blood pressure control was demonstrated to increase life expectancy between 1.0 and 2.4 years dependent on gender and age group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot demonstrated that clinical data extraction from electronic records is feasible although there are several limitations chiefly caused by the incompleteness of data for patients with T2DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":30591,"journal":{"name":"Informatics in Primary Care","volume":"20 2","pages":"95-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics in Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v20i2.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: The review of clinical data extraction from electronic records is increasingly being used as a tool to assist general practitioners (GPs) manage their patients in Australia. Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a chronic condition cared for primarily in the general practice setting that lends itself to the application of tools in this area.

Objective: To assess the feasibility of extracting data from a general practice medical record software package to predict clinically significant outcomes for patients with T2DM.

Methods: A pilot study was conducted involving two large practices where routinely collected clinical data were extracted and inputted into the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model to predict life expectancy. An initial assessment of the completeness of data available was performed and then for those patients aged between 45 and 64 years with adequate data life expectancies estimated.

Results: A total of 1019 patients were identified as current patients with T2DM. There were sufficient data available on 40% of patients from one practice and 49% from the other to provide inputs into the UKPDS Outcomes Model. Predicted life expectancy was similar across the practices with women having longer life expectancies than men. Improved compliance with current management guidelines for glycaemic, lipid and blood pressure control was demonstrated to increase life expectancy between 1.0 and 2.4 years dependent on gender and age group.

Conclusion: This pilot demonstrated that clinical data extraction from electronic records is feasible although there are several limitations chiefly caused by the incompleteness of data for patients with T2DM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从全科医生的电子病历中提取的数据能否用于预测2型糖尿病患者的临床结果?
背景:在澳大利亚,从电子记录中提取临床数据的审查越来越多地被用作辅助全科医生(gp)管理患者的工具。2型糖尿病(T2DM)是一种慢性疾病,主要在全科医生的环境中进行护理,因此适合在该领域应用工具。目的:评估从全科医疗记录软件包中提取数据以预测T2DM患者临床显著预后的可行性。方法:进行了一项涉及两个大型实践的试点研究,提取常规收集的临床数据并输入英国前瞻性糖尿病研究结果模型以预测预期寿命。对现有数据的完整性进行了初步评估,然后对年龄在45至64岁之间的患者进行了充分的预期寿命估计。结果:共有1019例患者被确定为T2DM患者。有来自一个诊所的40%的患者和来自另一个诊所的49%的患者的足够数据,可以为UKPDS结果模型提供输入。预测的预期寿命在实践中是相似的,女性的预期寿命比男性长。改善对血糖、血脂和血压控制的现行管理指南的依从性被证明可以根据性别和年龄组增加1.0至2.4年的预期寿命。结论:该试点表明,从电子病历中提取临床数据是可行的,但主要由于T2DM患者数据不完整而存在一些局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring an informed decision-making framework using in-home sensors: older adults' perceptions. Undertaking sociotechnical evaluations of health information technologies. Privacy protection for personal health information and shared care records. Coding errors in an analysis of the impact of pay-for-performance on the care for long-term cardiovascular disease: a case study. Effective pseudonymisation and explicit statements of public interest to ensure the benefits of sharing health data for research, quality improvement and health service management outweigh the risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1