Comparison of stabilities in translucency, fluorescence and opalescence of direct and indirect composite resins.

Bin Yu, Young-Keun Lee
{"title":"Comparison of stabilities in translucency, fluorescence and opalescence of direct and indirect composite resins.","authors":"Bin Yu,&nbsp;Young-Keun Lee","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate translucency, fluorescence and opalescence stabilities of direct and indirect composite resins after aging.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One direct (16 shades) and two indirect composite resins (16 and 26 shades) were investigated. Resins were filled in a mold (1 mm thick) and light cured; post-curings were performed for indirect resins. Color was measured before and after 5,000 cycles of thermocycling on a reflection spectrophotometer in reflectance and transmittance modes to calculate parameters for translucency (TP), fluorescence (FL) and opalescence (OP). Differences in the changes of TP, FL and OP after aging by the type of resin were determined by t test, and those were also determined by one-way ANOVA with the factor of the brand or the shade group (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Changes in TP, FL and OP were -1.2 to 0.7, -0.2 to 0.4 and -0.6 to 1.3, respectively, for direct resins; and were -2.0 to 1.8, -0.9 to 0.4 and -2.9 to 3.7, respectively, for indirect resins. Changes in TP were not significantly different by the type of resin, but those in FL and OP were different (P = 0.05). Changes in optical parameters were influenced by the brand or the shade group of the resins (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stabilities in optical properties of resins varied depending on type, brand or shade group. Aging significantly affected fluorescence and opalescence, but not translucency, of indirect resins compared to those of direct resins.</p>","PeriodicalId":88322,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry","volume":"8 2","pages":"214-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate translucency, fluorescence and opalescence stabilities of direct and indirect composite resins after aging.

Materials and methods: One direct (16 shades) and two indirect composite resins (16 and 26 shades) were investigated. Resins were filled in a mold (1 mm thick) and light cured; post-curings were performed for indirect resins. Color was measured before and after 5,000 cycles of thermocycling on a reflection spectrophotometer in reflectance and transmittance modes to calculate parameters for translucency (TP), fluorescence (FL) and opalescence (OP). Differences in the changes of TP, FL and OP after aging by the type of resin were determined by t test, and those were also determined by one-way ANOVA with the factor of the brand or the shade group (P < 0.05).

Results: Changes in TP, FL and OP were -1.2 to 0.7, -0.2 to 0.4 and -0.6 to 1.3, respectively, for direct resins; and were -2.0 to 1.8, -0.9 to 0.4 and -2.9 to 3.7, respectively, for indirect resins. Changes in TP were not significantly different by the type of resin, but those in FL and OP were different (P = 0.05). Changes in optical parameters were influenced by the brand or the shade group of the resins (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Stabilities in optical properties of resins varied depending on type, brand or shade group. Aging significantly affected fluorescence and opalescence, but not translucency, of indirect resins compared to those of direct resins.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接和间接复合树脂的半透明、荧光和乳光稳定性比较。
目的:评价直接复合树脂和间接复合树脂老化后的半透明性、荧光性和乳光性稳定性。材料和方法:研究了一种直接复合树脂(16种)和两种间接复合树脂(16种和26种)。树脂填充在1毫米厚的模具中,光固化;对间接树脂进行后固化。在反射分光光度计上以反射和透射模式测量5000次热循环前后的颜色,以计算半透明(TP)、荧光(FL)和乳光(OP)的参数。老化后TP、FL、OP随树脂种类变化的差异采用t检验,并采用单因素方差分析(单因素方差分析)与品牌或色度组的差异(P < 0.05)。结果:直接树脂TP、FL和OP的变化范围分别为-1.2 ~ 0.7、-0.2 ~ 0.4和-0.6 ~ 1.3;间接树脂分别为-2.0 ~ 1.8、-0.9 ~ 0.4和-2.9 ~ 3.7。TP随树脂种类的变化无显著性差异,但FL和OP的变化有显著性差异(P = 0.05)。光学参数的变化受树脂品牌和色度组的影响(P < 0.05)。结论:树脂光学性能的稳定性因类型、品牌和色系的不同而不同。与直接树脂相比,老化对间接树脂的荧光和乳光有显著影响,但对半透明没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biologically oriented dentistry. Biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT): a new approach for prosthetic restoration of periodontically healthy teeth. Modified two-stage procedures for the treatment of gingival recession. Esthetic direct restorations in endodontically treated anterior teeth. Modern treatment planning approach facing a failure of conventional treatment. Part II: case report and discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1