Common experiences of pain in children and adolescents--an exploratory factor analysis of a questionnaire.

Q Dentistry Swedish dental journal Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Larisa Krekmanova, Magnus Hakeberg, Agneta Robertson, Gunilla Klingberg
{"title":"Common experiences of pain in children and adolescents--an exploratory factor analysis of a questionnaire.","authors":"Larisa Krekmanova,&nbsp;Magnus Hakeberg,&nbsp;Agneta Robertson,&nbsp;Gunilla Klingberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to reduce everyday and dental treatment pain items included in the extended Children's Pain Inventory (CPI), used in a prior study on Swedish children and adolescents. Another aim was to, by means of exploratory factor analysis (EFA), expose hitherto undiscovered dimensions of the CPI pain variables and thus to improve the psychometric properties of CPI. As some pain items are relevant merely to some individuals, a new and more useful questionnaire construction would enhance the internal validity of the instrument in observational surveys. EFA was applied on the extended CPI instrument. 368 children, 8-19 years old, had answered a questionnaire comprising 10 dental and 28 everyday pain variables. These pain items were analysed using a series of sequentially implemented EFA. Interpretations and decisions on the final number of the extracted factors was based on accepted principles; Kaiser's Eigenvalue >1 criterion, inspection of the scree plot and the interpretability of the items loading. The factors were orthogonally rotated using the Varimax method to maximize the amount of variance. Of all tested EFA models in the analysis, a two, three, four, and five factor model surfaced. The interpretability of the factors and their items loading were stepwise examined; the items were modulated and the factors re-evaluated. A four factor pain model emerged as the most interpretable, explaining 79% of the total variance depicting Eigenvalues > 1.014. The factors were named indicating the profile of the content: Factor I cutting trauma to skin/mucosal pain, Factor II head/neck pain, Factor III tenderness/blunt trauma pain, Factor IV oral/dental treatment pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":22114,"journal":{"name":"Swedish dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swedish dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to reduce everyday and dental treatment pain items included in the extended Children's Pain Inventory (CPI), used in a prior study on Swedish children and adolescents. Another aim was to, by means of exploratory factor analysis (EFA), expose hitherto undiscovered dimensions of the CPI pain variables and thus to improve the psychometric properties of CPI. As some pain items are relevant merely to some individuals, a new and more useful questionnaire construction would enhance the internal validity of the instrument in observational surveys. EFA was applied on the extended CPI instrument. 368 children, 8-19 years old, had answered a questionnaire comprising 10 dental and 28 everyday pain variables. These pain items were analysed using a series of sequentially implemented EFA. Interpretations and decisions on the final number of the extracted factors was based on accepted principles; Kaiser's Eigenvalue >1 criterion, inspection of the scree plot and the interpretability of the items loading. The factors were orthogonally rotated using the Varimax method to maximize the amount of variance. Of all tested EFA models in the analysis, a two, three, four, and five factor model surfaced. The interpretability of the factors and their items loading were stepwise examined; the items were modulated and the factors re-evaluated. A four factor pain model emerged as the most interpretable, explaining 79% of the total variance depicting Eigenvalues > 1.014. The factors were named indicating the profile of the content: Factor I cutting trauma to skin/mucosal pain, Factor II head/neck pain, Factor III tenderness/blunt trauma pain, Factor IV oral/dental treatment pain.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童和青少年疼痛的共同经历——一项问卷的探索性因素分析。
该研究的目的是减少日常和牙科治疗中的疼痛项目,包括扩展儿童疼痛清单(CPI),在瑞典儿童和青少年的先前研究中使用。另一个目的是,通过探索性因素分析(EFA)的手段,揭示迄今为止未发现的CPI疼痛变量的维度,从而改善CPI的心理测量特性。由于某些疼痛项目仅与某些个体相关,因此新的更有用的问卷结构将提高该工具在观察性调查中的内部效度。EFA应用于扩展CPI工具。368名8-19岁的儿童回答了一份包含10个牙科和28个日常疼痛变量的问卷。使用一系列依次实施的EFA对这些疼痛项目进行分析。对抽取因素的最后数目的解释和决定是根据公认的原则作出的;Kaiser’s Eigenvalue >1标准,检验了屏幕图和项目加载的可解释性。使用Varimax方法正交旋转因子以最大限度地提高方差。在分析中所有测试的EFA模型中,出现了二、三、四和五因素模型。逐步检验各因素的可解释性及其项目负荷;对项目进行了调整,并对因素进行了重新评估。四因素疼痛模型是最可解释的,解释了描述特征值> 1.014的总方差的79%。因子的命名表明了内容的概况:因子I切割创伤到皮肤/粘膜疼痛,因子II头/颈部疼痛,因子III压痛/钝性创伤疼痛,因子IV口腔/牙科治疗疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Swedish dental journal
Swedish dental journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
0.85
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Swedish Dental Journal is the scientific journal of the Swedish Dental Association and the Swedish Dental Society. It is published 4 times a year to promote practice, education and research within odontology. Manuscripts containing original research are accepted for consideraion if neither the article nor any part of its essential substance has been or will be published elsewhere. Reviews, Case Reports and Short Communications will also be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Adverbs Verbs Punctuation Conjunctions Prepositions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1