Cytotoxicity of accelerated white MTA and Malaysian white Portland cement on stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED): An in vitro study
Ren Ming Ong, Norhayati Luddin, Hany Mohamed Aly Ahmed, Nor Shamsuria Omar
{"title":"Cytotoxicity of accelerated white MTA and Malaysian white Portland cement on stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED): An in vitro study","authors":"Ren Ming Ong, Norhayati Luddin, Hany Mohamed Aly Ahmed, Nor Shamsuria Omar","doi":"10.1016/j.sdj.2012.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of accelerated-set white MTA (AWMTA) and accelerated-set Malaysian white PC (AMWPC) on stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED). The test materials were introduced into paraffin wax moulds after mixing with calcium chloride dihydrate and sterile distilled water. Subsequently, the set cement specimens were sterilized, incubated in a prepared Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) for seven days. The biomarker CD166 was used for characterization of SHED using flow cytometry. The material extracts were diluted at five different concentrations and incubated for 72<!--> <!-->h with SHED. The cell viability was evaluated using Dimethylthiazol diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, and the data was analysed using Mann–Whitney test (<em>P</em><0.05). The results showed that AWMTA revealed significantly greater cell viability at 25 and 12.5<!--> <!-->mg/ml concentrations (<em>P</em><0.05). Concomitantly, AMWPC exhibited greater cell viability at concentrations <12.5<!--> <!-->mg/ml and the results were significant at 1.563<!--> <!-->mg/ml (<em>P</em><0.05). Both materials demonstrated moderate cytotoxicity at 25<!--> <!-->mg/ml and slight cytotoxicity at 6.25 and 3.125<!--> <!-->mg/ml. At 1.563<!--> <!-->mg/ml, no cytotoxic activity was merely observed with AMWPC. In conclusion, AMWPC exhibited favourable and comparable cell viability to that of AWMTA, and has the potential to be used as an alternative and less costly material in dental applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35891,"journal":{"name":"Singapore Dental Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 19-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.sdj.2012.11.001","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377529112000090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of accelerated-set white MTA (AWMTA) and accelerated-set Malaysian white PC (AMWPC) on stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED). The test materials were introduced into paraffin wax moulds after mixing with calcium chloride dihydrate and sterile distilled water. Subsequently, the set cement specimens were sterilized, incubated in a prepared Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) for seven days. The biomarker CD166 was used for characterization of SHED using flow cytometry. The material extracts were diluted at five different concentrations and incubated for 72 h with SHED. The cell viability was evaluated using Dimethylthiazol diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, and the data was analysed using Mann–Whitney test (P<0.05). The results showed that AWMTA revealed significantly greater cell viability at 25 and 12.5 mg/ml concentrations (P<0.05). Concomitantly, AMWPC exhibited greater cell viability at concentrations <12.5 mg/ml and the results were significant at 1.563 mg/ml (P<0.05). Both materials demonstrated moderate cytotoxicity at 25 mg/ml and slight cytotoxicity at 6.25 and 3.125 mg/ml. At 1.563 mg/ml, no cytotoxic activity was merely observed with AMWPC. In conclusion, AMWPC exhibited favourable and comparable cell viability to that of AWMTA, and has the potential to be used as an alternative and less costly material in dental applications.
期刊介绍:
The scope of the journal covers all fields related to the presentday practice of dentistry, and includes Restorative Dentistry (Operative Dentistry, Dental Materials, Prosthodontics and Endodontics), Preventive Dentistry (Periodontics, Orthodontics, Paediatric Dentistry, Public Health and Health Services), Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Oral Pathology. Articles pertaining to dental education and the social, political and economic aspects of dental practice are also welcomed.