Rapid bactericidal activity of sitafloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae.

The Japanese journal of antibiotics Pub Date : 2013-02-01
Hiroko Kanda, Kazue Inoue, Ryo Okumura, Kazuki Hoshino
{"title":"Rapid bactericidal activity of sitafloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae.","authors":"Hiroko Kanda,&nbsp;Kazue Inoue,&nbsp;Ryo Okumura,&nbsp;Kazuki Hoshino","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The initial bactericidal activity of quinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae at the concentration equivalent to their respective peak serum concentration (C(max)) and free drug fraction of C(max) (fC(max)) were investigated. The bactericidal activity of sitafloxacin (STFX), levofloxacin (LVFX), moxifloxacin (MFLX), and garenoxacin (GRNX) were compared by determining the actual killing of bacteria at C(max) and fC(max) for 1 and 2 hours based on the Japanese maximum dose per administration (100, 500, 400, and 400 mg, respectively). Against 4 quinolone-susceptible clinical isolates (wild-type), STFX with C(max) and fC(max) exhibited the most rapid bactericidal activity resulting in an average reduction of > or = 3.0 log10 colony forming units (CFU)/ mL in 1 hour. STFX with C(max) and fC(max) also showed the most rapid and potent bactericidal activity against 9 clinical isolates with single par (C/E) mutation, resulting in > or = 3.0 log10 CFU/mL average reduction in viable cells in 1 hour. STFX showed a statistically significant advantage in initial bactericidal activity over other quinolones for single mutants (P < 0.001). The propensity that the difference in the initial bactericidal activity between STFX and other quinolones was higher in single mutants than wild-type strains, was confirmed using S. pneumoniae ATCC49619 (wild-type) and its laboratory single parC mutant. As a result, STFX showed a similar rapid and potent initial bactericidal activity against both strains, while initial bactericidal activity for other quinolones was significantly reduced in the single mutant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, STFX has the most rapid and potent initial bactericidal activity against wild-type and single mutants of S. pneumoniae and its bactericidal activity is not affected by the presence of a single par mutation compared to LVFX, MFLX, and GRNX.</p>","PeriodicalId":22536,"journal":{"name":"The Japanese journal of antibiotics","volume":"66 1","pages":"9-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Japanese journal of antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The initial bactericidal activity of quinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae at the concentration equivalent to their respective peak serum concentration (C(max)) and free drug fraction of C(max) (fC(max)) were investigated. The bactericidal activity of sitafloxacin (STFX), levofloxacin (LVFX), moxifloxacin (MFLX), and garenoxacin (GRNX) were compared by determining the actual killing of bacteria at C(max) and fC(max) for 1 and 2 hours based on the Japanese maximum dose per administration (100, 500, 400, and 400 mg, respectively). Against 4 quinolone-susceptible clinical isolates (wild-type), STFX with C(max) and fC(max) exhibited the most rapid bactericidal activity resulting in an average reduction of > or = 3.0 log10 colony forming units (CFU)/ mL in 1 hour. STFX with C(max) and fC(max) also showed the most rapid and potent bactericidal activity against 9 clinical isolates with single par (C/E) mutation, resulting in > or = 3.0 log10 CFU/mL average reduction in viable cells in 1 hour. STFX showed a statistically significant advantage in initial bactericidal activity over other quinolones for single mutants (P < 0.001). The propensity that the difference in the initial bactericidal activity between STFX and other quinolones was higher in single mutants than wild-type strains, was confirmed using S. pneumoniae ATCC49619 (wild-type) and its laboratory single parC mutant. As a result, STFX showed a similar rapid and potent initial bactericidal activity against both strains, while initial bactericidal activity for other quinolones was significantly reduced in the single mutant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, STFX has the most rapid and potent initial bactericidal activity against wild-type and single mutants of S. pneumoniae and its bactericidal activity is not affected by the presence of a single par mutation compared to LVFX, MFLX, and GRNX.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西他沙星对肺炎链球菌的快速杀菌活性研究。
研究了喹诺酮类药物在其各自的血清峰值浓度(C(max))和游离药物分数(C(max))相等的浓度下对肺炎链球菌的初始杀菌活性。以日本最大给药剂量(分别为100、500、400和400 mg)为基准,测定了西他沙星(STFX)、左氧氟沙星(LVFX)、莫西沙星(MFLX)和加诺沙星(GRNX)在C(max)和fC(max)作用1和2小时的实际杀灭菌量,比较了它们的杀菌活性。对4株喹诺酮类药物敏感临床分离株(野生型),具有C(max)和fC(max)的STFX表现出最快的杀菌活性,在1小时内平均减少>或= 3.0 log10菌落形成单位(CFU)/ mL。具有C(max)和fC(max)的STFX对9株具有单par (C/E)突变的临床分离株也表现出最快速和最有效的杀菌活性,导致活细胞在1小时内平均降低>或= 3.0 log10 CFU/mL。STFX在单突变体的初始杀菌活性上比其他喹诺酮类药物有统计学上的显著优势(P < 0.001)。利用肺炎链球菌ATCC49619(野生型)及其实验室单个parC突变体证实了STFX与其他喹诺酮类药物在单突变株中的初始杀菌活性差异高于野生型菌株的趋势。结果表明,STFX对两种菌株均表现出相似的快速有效的初始杀菌活性,而对其他喹诺酮类药物的初始杀菌活性在单突变体中显著降低(P < 0.05)。综上所述,与LVFX、MFLX和GRNX相比,STFX对肺炎链球菌野生型和单突变体具有最快速、最有效的初始杀菌活性,且其杀菌活性不受单突变体存在的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Carumonam]. [Cefroxadine]. Importance of prevention in pneumonia in elderly -Attempted use of macrolide therapy. High efficiency method of detection and isolation of neuraminidase inhibitor resistant influenza viruses by fluorescence sialidase imaging. The change of susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains isolated from pediatric patients at Asahikawa Kosei Hospital between 2011 and 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1