Building access to specialist care through e-consultation.

Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal Pub Date : 2013-01-08 Print Date: 2013-01-01
Clare Liddy, Margo S Rowan, Amir Afkham, Julie Maranger, Erin Keely
{"title":"Building access to specialist care through e-consultation.","authors":"Clare Liddy,&nbsp;Margo S Rowan,&nbsp;Amir Afkham,&nbsp;Julie Maranger,&nbsp;Erin Keely","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited access to specialist care remains a major barrier to health care in Canada, affecting patients and primary care providers alike, in terms of both long wait times and inequitable availability. We developed an electronic consultation system, based on a secure web-based tool, as an alternative to face-to-face consultations, and ran a pilot study to evaluate its effectiveness and acceptability to practitioners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a pilot program conducted over 15 months starting in January 2010, the e-consultation system was tested with primary care providers and specialists in a large health region in Eastern Ontario, Canada. We collected utilization data from the electronic system itself (including quantitative data from satisfaction surveys) and qualitative information from focus groups and interviews with providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 18 primary care providers in the pilot program, 13 participated in focus groups and 9 were interviewed; in addition, 10 of the 11 specialists in the program were interviewed. Results of our evaluation showed good uptake, high levels of satisfaction, improvement in the integration of referrals and consultations, and avoidance of unnecessary specialist visits. A total of 77 e-consultation requests were processed from 1 Jan. 2010 to 1 Apr. 2011. Less than 10% of the referrals required face-to-face follow-up. The most frequently noted benefits for patients (as perceived by providers) included improved access to specialist care and reduced wait times. Primary care providers valued the ability to assist with patient assessment and management by having access to a rapid response to clinical questions, clarifying the need for diagnostic tests or treatments, and confirming the need for a formal consultation. Specialists enjoyed the improved interaction with primary care providers, as well as having some control in the decision on which patients should be referred.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This low-cost referral system has potential for broader implementation, once payment models for physicians are adapted to cover e-consultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"e1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/aa/af/OpenMed-07-e1.PMC3654501.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limited access to specialist care remains a major barrier to health care in Canada, affecting patients and primary care providers alike, in terms of both long wait times and inequitable availability. We developed an electronic consultation system, based on a secure web-based tool, as an alternative to face-to-face consultations, and ran a pilot study to evaluate its effectiveness and acceptability to practitioners.

Methods: In a pilot program conducted over 15 months starting in January 2010, the e-consultation system was tested with primary care providers and specialists in a large health region in Eastern Ontario, Canada. We collected utilization data from the electronic system itself (including quantitative data from satisfaction surveys) and qualitative information from focus groups and interviews with providers.

Results: Of 18 primary care providers in the pilot program, 13 participated in focus groups and 9 were interviewed; in addition, 10 of the 11 specialists in the program were interviewed. Results of our evaluation showed good uptake, high levels of satisfaction, improvement in the integration of referrals and consultations, and avoidance of unnecessary specialist visits. A total of 77 e-consultation requests were processed from 1 Jan. 2010 to 1 Apr. 2011. Less than 10% of the referrals required face-to-face follow-up. The most frequently noted benefits for patients (as perceived by providers) included improved access to specialist care and reduced wait times. Primary care providers valued the ability to assist with patient assessment and management by having access to a rapid response to clinical questions, clarifying the need for diagnostic tests or treatments, and confirming the need for a formal consultation. Specialists enjoyed the improved interaction with primary care providers, as well as having some control in the decision on which patients should be referred.

Interpretation: This low-cost referral system has potential for broader implementation, once payment models for physicians are adapted to cover e-consultation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过电子咨询建立获得专家护理的渠道。
背景:获得专科护理的机会有限仍然是加拿大保健的一个主要障碍,在等待时间长和可获得性不公平方面对患者和初级保健提供者都有影响。我们开发了一个基于安全网络工具的电子咨询系统,作为面对面咨询的替代方案,并进行了一项试点研究,以评估其有效性和从业者的接受程度。方法:从2010年1月开始,在一项为期15个月的试点项目中,电子咨询系统在加拿大安大略省东部一个大型卫生地区的初级保健提供者和专家中进行了测试。我们收集了来自电子系统本身的使用数据(包括来自满意度调查的定量数据)和来自焦点小组和对提供者访谈的定性信息。结果:18名基层医疗服务提供者中,13人参加了焦点小组,9人接受了访谈;此外,该计划的11名专家中有10人接受了采访。我们的评估结果显示了良好的吸收,高水平的满意度,改善了转诊和咨询的整合,并避免了不必要的专家访问。从2010年1月1日至2011年4月1日,共处理了77个电子咨询请求。不到10%的转诊患者需要面对面的随访。对病人来说,最常见的好处(如提供者所认为的)包括改善了获得专科护理的机会和减少了等待时间。初级保健提供者重视协助病人评估和管理的能力,因为他们能够对临床问题作出快速反应,澄清诊断测试或治疗的必要性,并确认需要进行正式咨询。专家们喜欢与初级保健提供者改善的互动,以及在决定哪些病人应该转诊方面有一定的控制权。解释:一旦医生的支付模式适应了电子咨询,这种低成本转诊系统就有可能得到更广泛的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Closing Open Medicine. Use of mental health care for nonpsychotic conditions by immigrants in different admission classes and by refugees in Ontario, Canada. Comparison of sampling methods for hard-to-reach francophone populations: yield and adequacy of advertisement and respondent-driven sampling. Pan-Canadian overpricing of medicines: a 6-country study of cost control for generic medicines. Dengue fever: a Wikipedia clinical review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1