Hearing screening for school children: utility of noise-cancelling headphones.

Ada Hiu Chong Lo, Bradley McPherson
{"title":"Hearing screening for school children: utility of noise-cancelling headphones.","authors":"Ada Hiu Chong Lo, Bradley McPherson","doi":"10.1186/1472-6815-13-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Excessive ambient noise in school settings is a major concern for school hearing screening as it typically masks pure tone test stimuli (particularly 500 Hz and below). This results in false positive findings and subsequent unnecessary follow-up. With advances in technology, noise-cancelling headphones have been developed that reduce low frequency noise by superimposing an anti-phase signal onto the primary noise. This research study examined the utility of noise-cancelling headphone technology in a school hearing screening environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study compared the audiometric screening results obtained from two air-conduction transducers-Sennheiser PXC450 noise-cancelling circumaural headphones (NC headphones) and conventional TDH-39 supra-aural earphones. Pure-tone hearing screening results (500 Hz to 4000 Hz, at 30 dB HL and 25 dB HL) were obtained from 232 school children, aged 6 to 8 years, in four Hong Kong primary schools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Screening outcomes revealed significant differences in referral rates between TDH-39 earphones and NC headphones for both 30 dB HL and 25 dB HL criteria, regardless of the inclusion or exclusion of 500 Hz results. The kappa observed agreement (OA) showed that at both screening intensities, the transducers' referral agreement value for the 500 Hz inclusion group was smaller than for the 500 Hz exclusion group. Individual frequency analysis showed that the two transducers screened similarly at 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz at 25 dB HL, as well as at both 30 dB HL and 25 dB HL screening levels for 4000 Hz. Statistically significant differences were found for 500 Hz at 30 dB HL and at 25 dB HL, and for 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz at 30 dB HL. OA for individual frequencies showed weaker intra-frequency agreement between the two transducers at 500 Hz at both intensity criterion levels than at higher frequencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NC headphones screening results differed from those obtained from TDH-39 earphones, with lower referral rates at 500 Hz, particularly at the 25 dB HL criterion level. Therefore, NC headphones may be able to operate at lower screening intensities and subsequently increase pure-tone screening test sensitivity, without compromising specificity. NC headphones show some promise as possible replacements for conventional earphones in school hearing screening programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":39843,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3668193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-13-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Excessive ambient noise in school settings is a major concern for school hearing screening as it typically masks pure tone test stimuli (particularly 500 Hz and below). This results in false positive findings and subsequent unnecessary follow-up. With advances in technology, noise-cancelling headphones have been developed that reduce low frequency noise by superimposing an anti-phase signal onto the primary noise. This research study examined the utility of noise-cancelling headphone technology in a school hearing screening environment.

Methods: The present study compared the audiometric screening results obtained from two air-conduction transducers-Sennheiser PXC450 noise-cancelling circumaural headphones (NC headphones) and conventional TDH-39 supra-aural earphones. Pure-tone hearing screening results (500 Hz to 4000 Hz, at 30 dB HL and 25 dB HL) were obtained from 232 school children, aged 6 to 8 years, in four Hong Kong primary schools.

Results: Screening outcomes revealed significant differences in referral rates between TDH-39 earphones and NC headphones for both 30 dB HL and 25 dB HL criteria, regardless of the inclusion or exclusion of 500 Hz results. The kappa observed agreement (OA) showed that at both screening intensities, the transducers' referral agreement value for the 500 Hz inclusion group was smaller than for the 500 Hz exclusion group. Individual frequency analysis showed that the two transducers screened similarly at 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz at 25 dB HL, as well as at both 30 dB HL and 25 dB HL screening levels for 4000 Hz. Statistically significant differences were found for 500 Hz at 30 dB HL and at 25 dB HL, and for 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz at 30 dB HL. OA for individual frequencies showed weaker intra-frequency agreement between the two transducers at 500 Hz at both intensity criterion levels than at higher frequencies.

Conclusions: NC headphones screening results differed from those obtained from TDH-39 earphones, with lower referral rates at 500 Hz, particularly at the 25 dB HL criterion level. Therefore, NC headphones may be able to operate at lower screening intensities and subsequently increase pure-tone screening test sensitivity, without compromising specificity. NC headphones show some promise as possible replacements for conventional earphones in school hearing screening programs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学龄儿童听力筛查:降噪耳机的实用性。
背景:学校环境中的环境噪声过大是学校听力筛查的一个主要问题,因为它通常会掩盖纯音测试刺激(尤其是 500 赫兹及以下)。这就造成了假阳性结果和不必要的后续检查。随着技术的进步,降噪耳机应运而生,它通过在主噪声上叠加反相信号来降低低频噪声。本研究探讨了降噪耳机技术在学校听力筛查环境中的实用性:本研究比较了两种空气传导传感器--森海塞尔 PXC450 降噪环耳耳机(NC 耳机)和传统 TDH-39 超级耳机的听力筛查结果。纯音听力筛查结果(500 Hz 至 4000 Hz,30 dB HL 和 25 dB HL)来自香港四所小学的 232 名 6 至 8 岁学童:筛查结果显示,在 30 dB HL 和 25 dB HL 标准下,TDH-39 耳机和 NC 耳机的转诊率存在明显差异,无论是否纳入 500 Hz 结果。卡帕观测协议(OA)显示,在两种筛查强度下,500 Hz 纳入组的换能器转介协议值均小于 500 Hz 排除组。单个频率分析表明,在 25 dB HL 时,两个传感器对 1000 Hz 和 2000 Hz 的筛查结果相似,在 30 dB HL 和 25 dB HL 时,对 4000 Hz 的筛查结果也相似。在 30 dB HL 和 25 dB HL 条件下,500 Hz 的差异具有统计学意义;在 30 dB HL 条件下,1000 Hz 和 2000 Hz 的差异具有统计学意义。单个频率的 OA 显示,在两个强度标准水平下,两个传感器在 500 Hz 频率内的一致性比在更高频率上更弱:NC耳机的筛查结果与TDH-39耳机的结果不同,500 Hz的转介率较低,尤其是在25 dB HL标准水平时。因此,NC 耳机可能可以在较低的筛查强度下工作,从而在不影响特异性的情况下提高纯音筛查测试的灵敏度。在学校听力筛查项目中,数控耳机有望取代传统耳机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of ear, nose and throat disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders (ISSN 1472-6815) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Cochlear implantation as a treatment for single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss: a randomized controlled evaluation of cost-utility. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria isolated from patients with ear discharge in Jimma Town, Southwest, Ethiopia. Staphylococcus aureus from patients with chronic rhinosinusitis show minimal genetic association between polyp and non-polyp phenotypes. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma: a population-based survival analysis. Odontogenic necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review of the literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1