Ultrashort-pulse lasers treating the crystalline lens: will they cause vision-threatening cataract? (An American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Ronald R Krueger, Harvey Uy, Jared McDonald, Keith Edwards
{"title":"Ultrashort-pulse lasers treating the crystalline lens: will they cause vision-threatening cataract? (An American Ophthalmological Society thesis).","authors":"Ronald R Krueger,&nbsp;Harvey Uy,&nbsp;Jared McDonald,&nbsp;Keith Edwards","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To demonstrate that ultrashort-pulse laser treatment in the crystalline lens does not form a focal, progressive, or vision-threatening cataract.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An Nd:vanadate picosecond laser (10 ps) with prototype delivery system was used. Primates: 11 rhesus monkey eyes were prospectively treated at the University of Wisconsin (energy 25-45 μJ/pulse and 2.0-11.3M pulses per lens). Analysis of lens clarity and fundus imaging was assessed postoperatively for up to 4½ years (5 eyes). Humans: 80 presbyopic patients were prospectively treated in one eye at the Asian Eye Institute in the Philippines (energy 10 μJ/pulse and 0.45-1.45M pulses per lens). Analysis of lens clarity, best-corrected visual acuity, and subjective symptoms was performed at 1 month, prior to elective lens extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bubbles were immediately seen, with resolution within the first 24 to 48 hours. Afterwards, the laser pattern could be seen with faint, noncoalescing, pinpoint micro-opacities in both primate and human eyes. In primates, long-term follow-up at 4½ years showed no focal or progressive cataract, except in 2 eyes with preexisting cataract. In humans, <25% of patients with central sparing (0.75 and 1.0 mm radius) lost 2 or more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 1 month, and >70% reported acceptable or better distance vision and no or mild symptoms. Meanwhile, >70% without sparing (0 and 0.5 mm radius) lost 2 or more lines, and most reported poor or severe vision and symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Focal, progressive, and vision-threatening cataracts can be avoided by lowering the laser energy, avoiding prior cataract, and sparing the center of the lens.</p>","PeriodicalId":23166,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671365/pdf/1545-6110_v110_p130.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To demonstrate that ultrashort-pulse laser treatment in the crystalline lens does not form a focal, progressive, or vision-threatening cataract.

Methods: An Nd:vanadate picosecond laser (10 ps) with prototype delivery system was used. Primates: 11 rhesus monkey eyes were prospectively treated at the University of Wisconsin (energy 25-45 μJ/pulse and 2.0-11.3M pulses per lens). Analysis of lens clarity and fundus imaging was assessed postoperatively for up to 4½ years (5 eyes). Humans: 80 presbyopic patients were prospectively treated in one eye at the Asian Eye Institute in the Philippines (energy 10 μJ/pulse and 0.45-1.45M pulses per lens). Analysis of lens clarity, best-corrected visual acuity, and subjective symptoms was performed at 1 month, prior to elective lens extraction.

Results: Bubbles were immediately seen, with resolution within the first 24 to 48 hours. Afterwards, the laser pattern could be seen with faint, noncoalescing, pinpoint micro-opacities in both primate and human eyes. In primates, long-term follow-up at 4½ years showed no focal or progressive cataract, except in 2 eyes with preexisting cataract. In humans, <25% of patients with central sparing (0.75 and 1.0 mm radius) lost 2 or more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 1 month, and >70% reported acceptable or better distance vision and no or mild symptoms. Meanwhile, >70% without sparing (0 and 0.5 mm radius) lost 2 or more lines, and most reported poor or severe vision and symptoms.

Conclusions: Focal, progressive, and vision-threatening cataracts can be avoided by lowering the laser energy, avoiding prior cataract, and sparing the center of the lens.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超短脉冲激光治疗晶状体:会导致威胁视力的白内障吗?(美国眼科学会论文)。
目的:证明超短脉冲激光治疗晶状体不会形成局灶性、进行性或威胁视力的白内障。方法:采用钒酸Nd皮秒激光(10 ps)和原型传输系统。灵长类动物:在威斯康星大学对11只恒河猴眼睛进行前瞻性治疗(能量25-45 μJ/脉冲,每个晶状体2.0-11.3M脉冲)。术后评估晶状体清晰度和眼底成像分析长达4年半(5只眼)。人类:在菲律宾亚洲眼科研究所对80例老视眼患者进行单眼前瞻性治疗(能量10 μJ/脉冲,每晶状体0.45-1.45M脉冲)。在择期晶状体摘除前1个月,对晶状体清晰度、最佳矫正视力和主观症状进行分析。结果:气泡立即可见,在前24至48小时内溶解。之后,激光图案可以在灵长类动物和人类的眼睛中看到微弱的,非聚结的,精确的微混浊。在灵长类动物中,长期随访4年半,除了2只眼睛先前存在白内障外,没有发现局灶性或进行性白内障。在人类中,70%报告可接受或更好的远距离视力,无症状或轻度症状。同时,>70%的无保留(0和0.5 mm半径)患者失去2条或更多的线,大多数报告视力差或严重的视力和症状。结论:降低激光能量,避免既往白内障,保留晶状体中心,可避免局灶性、进行性和视力威胁白内障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Utility of Color Duplex Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective, Masked Study. (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). Autoimmune Retinopathy: Current Concepts and Practices (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). The Relationship Between Ocular Itch, Ocular Pain, and Dry Eye Symptoms (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). Erratum: Predictors of Intraocular Pressure After Phacoemulsification in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Eyes with Wide Versus Narrower Angles (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). The Effects of Phacoemulsification and Intraocular Lens Implantation on Anatomical and Functional Parameters in Patients with Primary Angle Closure: A Prospective Study. (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1