Evaluation of a BeadXpress assay for a 151-mutation and variant CFTR screening panel after 11,000 samples: implications for practice.

Jay Stoerker, Thomas G Goodman, Heather M Walline, Jeffrey Sugalski, Carol A Holland
{"title":"Evaluation of a BeadXpress assay for a 151-mutation and variant CFTR screening panel after 11,000 samples: implications for practice.","authors":"Jay Stoerker,&nbsp;Thomas G Goodman,&nbsp;Heather M Walline,&nbsp;Jeffrey Sugalski,&nbsp;Carol A Holland","doi":"10.1097/PDM.0b013e318286b4c0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We created a 151-mutation and variant screening panel for cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) using the Illumina Inc. BeadXpress platform (San Diego, CA). The laboratory developed test was validated using a third-party blinding of a set of 450 samples split with an authority laboratory that provides a large panel CFTR screening and 50 diverse controls admixed randomly. The validation proved the test to be 100% sensitive for the mutations tested and >99% specific. A total of 391 mutations in 11,186 samples tested were confirmed by repeat analysis and sequencing, resulting in an overall confirmed positive rate of 3.5%. Of the mutations detected, 348 were part of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) panel (89%) and 43 were non-ACOG (11%). A total of 16 of the 23 ACOG panel mutations were discovered in this cohort, along with 21 different non-ACOG mutation genotypes. We confirmed 6 total patients carrying mutations that would not have been identified by any other commercial panel. The role of a large genotyping panel in carrier screening is discussed relative to the ACOG panel and also in relation to comparative efficacy with targeted massive parallel sequencing. </p>","PeriodicalId":11235,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","volume":"22 3","pages":"144-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PDM.0b013e318286b4c0","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PDM.0b013e318286b4c0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We created a 151-mutation and variant screening panel for cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) using the Illumina Inc. BeadXpress platform (San Diego, CA). The laboratory developed test was validated using a third-party blinding of a set of 450 samples split with an authority laboratory that provides a large panel CFTR screening and 50 diverse controls admixed randomly. The validation proved the test to be 100% sensitive for the mutations tested and >99% specific. A total of 391 mutations in 11,186 samples tested were confirmed by repeat analysis and sequencing, resulting in an overall confirmed positive rate of 3.5%. Of the mutations detected, 348 were part of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) panel (89%) and 43 were non-ACOG (11%). A total of 16 of the 23 ACOG panel mutations were discovered in this cohort, along with 21 different non-ACOG mutation genotypes. We confirmed 6 total patients carrying mutations that would not have been identified by any other commercial panel. The role of a large genotyping panel in carrier screening is discussed relative to the ACOG panel and also in relation to comparative efficacy with targeted massive parallel sequencing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对11,000个样本后151个突变和变异CFTR筛选小组的BeadXpress检测的评估:实践意义
我们使用Illumina Inc.创建了一个151突变和变异的囊性纤维化跨膜调节剂(CFTR)筛选小组。BeadXpress平台(San Diego, CA)实验室开发的测试使用第三方盲法进行验证,该盲法由权威实验室提供450个样本,该实验室提供大型CFTR筛选面板和50个随机混合的不同对照。验证证明该测试对所测试的突变具有100%的敏感性和>99%的特异性。通过重复分析和测序,在11186份检测样本中共发现391个突变,总体确诊阳性率为3.5%。在检测到的突变中,348例属于美国妇产科学会(ACOG)小组(89%),43例非ACOG(11%)。在该队列中发现了23个ACOG组突变中的16个,以及21个不同的非ACOG突变基因型。我们总共确认了6名携带突变的患者,这些突变不会被任何其他商业小组发现。讨论了大型基因分型小组在携带者筛选中的作用,与ACOG小组以及与靶向大规模平行测序的比较功效有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Molecular Pathology focuses on providing clinical and academic pathologists with coverage of the latest molecular technologies, timely reviews of established techniques, and papers on the applications of these methods to all aspects of surgical pathology and laboratory medicine. It publishes original, peer-reviewed contributions on molecular probes for diagnosis, such as tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and in situ hybridization. Articles demonstrate how these highly sensitive techniques can be applied for more accurate diagnosis.
期刊最新文献
Index Molecular Testing for Respiratory Viruses Molecular Testing in Emerging Infectious Diseases Frequent PIK3CA mutations in radial scars. Pyrosequencing for EGFR mutation detection: diagnostic accuracy and clinical implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1