Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Graft-versus-Host Reaction: Revisiting a Puzzling Similarity.

ISRN Dermatology Pub Date : 2013-06-03 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/651590
G E Piérard, T Hermanns-Lê, P Paquet, A F Rousseau, P Delvenne, C Piérard-Franchimont
{"title":"Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Graft-versus-Host Reaction: Revisiting a Puzzling Similarity.","authors":"G E Piérard,&nbsp;T Hermanns-Lê,&nbsp;P Paquet,&nbsp;A F Rousseau,&nbsp;P Delvenne,&nbsp;C Piérard-Franchimont","doi":"10.1155/2013/651590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and acute cutaneous graft-versus-host reaction (GVHR) under immunopreventive therapy share some histopathological resemblance. So far, there are no serum biomarkers and no immunohistochemical criteria distinguishing with confidence and specificity the skin lesions of TEN and GVHR. Both diseases present as an inflammatory cell-poor necrotic reaction of the epidermis. This report compares three sets of 15 immunostaining patterns found in TEN, GVHR, and partial thickness thermal burns (PTTB), respectively. Three series of 17 skin biopsies were scrutinized. Irrespective of the distinct causal pathobiology of TEN and GVHR, similar secondary effector cells were recruited in lesional skin. Burns were less enriched in cells of the monocyte-macrophage disease. These cells likely exert deleterious effects in TEN and GVHR and cannot be simply regarded as passive bystanders. These life-threatening conditions are probably nursed, at least in part, by macrophages. </p>","PeriodicalId":14682,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Dermatology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"651590"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/651590","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/651590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Drug-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and acute cutaneous graft-versus-host reaction (GVHR) under immunopreventive therapy share some histopathological resemblance. So far, there are no serum biomarkers and no immunohistochemical criteria distinguishing with confidence and specificity the skin lesions of TEN and GVHR. Both diseases present as an inflammatory cell-poor necrotic reaction of the epidermis. This report compares three sets of 15 immunostaining patterns found in TEN, GVHR, and partial thickness thermal burns (PTTB), respectively. Three series of 17 skin biopsies were scrutinized. Irrespective of the distinct causal pathobiology of TEN and GVHR, similar secondary effector cells were recruited in lesional skin. Burns were less enriched in cells of the monocyte-macrophage disease. These cells likely exert deleterious effects in TEN and GVHR and cannot be simply regarded as passive bystanders. These life-threatening conditions are probably nursed, at least in part, by macrophages.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
毒性表皮坏死松解和移植物抗宿主反应:重新审视令人困惑的相似性。
免疫预防治疗下药物诱导的毒性表皮坏死松解(TEN)和急性皮肤移植物抗宿主反应(GVHR)具有一定的组织病理学相似性。到目前为止,还没有血清生物标志物和免疫组织化学标准能够可靠和特异性地区分TEN和GVHR的皮肤病变。这两种疾病都表现为表皮炎症细胞缺乏的坏死反应。本报告比较了分别在TEN、GVHR和部分厚度热烧伤(PTTB)中发现的三组15种免疫染色模式。对3组17例皮肤活检进行了仔细检查。不考虑TEN和GVHR不同的因果病理生物学,在病变皮肤中招募了类似的次级效应细胞。烧伤中单核-巨噬细胞病细胞的富集较少。这些细胞可能对TEN和GVHR产生有害影响,不能简单地认为它们是被动的旁观者。这些危及生命的疾病可能至少部分是由巨噬细胞护理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nanotechnology-based cosmeceuticals. Hypertrichosis Is Not so Prevalent in Becker's Nevus: Analysis of 47 Cases. Correlation of Vitamin D Levels with Pigmentation in Vitiligo Patients Treated with NBUVB Therapy. Histological comparison of two cryopeeling methods for photodamaged skin. Prevalence of psychological disorders in patients with alopecia areata in comparison with normal subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1