The Bioethical Concept of Life for Life in Judaism, Catholicism, and Islam: Abortion When the Mother's Life is in Danger.

Rhami Khorfan, Aasim I Padela
{"title":"The Bioethical Concept of Life for Life in Judaism, Catholicism, and Islam: Abortion When the Mother's Life is in Danger.","authors":"Rhami Khorfan,&nbsp;Aasim I Padela","doi":"10.5915/42-3-5351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modern secular bioethics has focused on developing a set of universal principles to guide clinical decision making. However, this ignores the important role of religion in resolving bioethical questions. It is imperative that health-care providers understand these belief systems in order to traverse value conflicts and provide the highest quality care to a diverse population. This paper focuses on the process of bioethical deliberation in Judaism, Catholicism, and Islam. Abortion is normatively prohibited in each faith and through examining how each ethical code allows for abortion when the mother's life is in peril due to the fetus, we highlight the value of unborn life in each faith. Orthodox Judaism uses the concept of rodef, or pursuer, to permit abortion in this scenario, Catholicism uses the moral concept of \"double effect,\" while Islamic law cites the maqāṣid, higher objectives of the law, to permit abortion in this scenario. </p>","PeriodicalId":89859,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of IMA","volume":"42 3","pages":"99-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5915/42-3-5351","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of IMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5915/42-3-5351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Modern secular bioethics has focused on developing a set of universal principles to guide clinical decision making. However, this ignores the important role of religion in resolving bioethical questions. It is imperative that health-care providers understand these belief systems in order to traverse value conflicts and provide the highest quality care to a diverse population. This paper focuses on the process of bioethical deliberation in Judaism, Catholicism, and Islam. Abortion is normatively prohibited in each faith and through examining how each ethical code allows for abortion when the mother's life is in peril due to the fetus, we highlight the value of unborn life in each faith. Orthodox Judaism uses the concept of rodef, or pursuer, to permit abortion in this scenario, Catholicism uses the moral concept of "double effect," while Islamic law cites the maqāṣid, higher objectives of the law, to permit abortion in this scenario.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
犹太教、天主教和伊斯兰教的生命伦理观念:当母亲的生命处于危险中时堕胎。
现代世俗生命伦理学的重点是发展一套指导临床决策的普遍原则。然而,这忽略了宗教在解决生物伦理问题中的重要作用。卫生保健提供者必须了解这些信仰体系,以便跨越价值观冲突,为不同人群提供最高质量的医疗服务。本文着重讨论了犹太教、天主教和伊斯兰教的生命伦理审议过程。堕胎在每个信仰中都是被规范禁止的,通过检查每个道德规范如何允许堕胎,当母亲的生命因胎儿而处于危险之中时,我们强调了每个信仰中未出生生命的价值。正统犹太教使用rodef或追求者的概念来允许在这种情况下堕胎,天主教使用“双重效果”的道德概念,而伊斯兰教法引用maqāṣid,法律的更高目标,允许在这种情况下堕胎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of breast cancer by vaccine: fact or fiction. Ethics of surrogacy: a comparative study of Western secular and islamic bioethics. Achalasia cardia in infants: report of two cases. A Pilot Trial of Jawarish Amla as Adjuvant to Anti-Tubercular Treatment Drugs for Control of Adverse Reactions in DOTS Regime in Pulmonary TB. American Muslim Women: Negotiating Race, Class, and Gender Within the Ummah by Jamillah Karim
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1