Overview of reviews in child health: evidence synthesis and the knowledge base for a specific population

Denise Thomson, Michelle Foisy, Marta Oleszczuk, Aireen Wingert, Annabritt Chisholm, Lisa Hartling
{"title":"Overview of reviews in child health: evidence synthesis and the knowledge base for a specific population","authors":"Denise Thomson,&nbsp;Michelle Foisy,&nbsp;Marta Oleszczuk,&nbsp;Aireen Wingert,&nbsp;Annabritt Chisholm,&nbsp;Lisa Hartling","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Overviews of reviews are an evolving form of evidence synthesis. The Cochrane Child Health Field has been producing overviews since 2006, during which time the methods that have been used have changed, both due to the development of guidance within The Cochrane Collaboration and to the decisions made by individual author teams. This paper studies the first 29 overviews published in EBCH.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To describe some aspects of the approaches taken in EBCH overviews to producing evidence syntheses relevant to the healthcare needs of children; to highlight the contribution that overviews can make to the knowledge base for treatment for a particular population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data was extracted on: whether the overview included systematic review (SR) data only, or also data from individual trials not present in the included SRs; name(s) of the Cochrane Review Group (CRG) that prepared the included SRs; topics of the overviews as compared to the topics of the included reviews; age-subgroup analyses presented in the overviews.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In 23 overviews, all published in 2012, the authors included trial data as well as SR data; two overviews addressed conditions not explicitly addressed by the included reviews; three overviews included pre-specified age-subgroup analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of clinical relevance has been achieved by means such as: drawing from reviews produced by multiple CRGs; using SR evidence to explore clinically relevant topics that may not match exactly with the topics covered by the SRs; ensuring that the evidence in overviews is as up to date as possible by redoing searches and including trials not incorporated in the included SRs; and, where permitted by the data, using age-subgroup analyses to present the data in a way which matches the stages of childhood development.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Overview authors are dependent on the nature of the data and methods reported in the included SRs. This suggests a need for further study about how SRs could be conducted in order to facilitate the conduct of overviews. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. The Cochrane Collaboration</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1897","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ebch.1897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Background

Overviews of reviews are an evolving form of evidence synthesis. The Cochrane Child Health Field has been producing overviews since 2006, during which time the methods that have been used have changed, both due to the development of guidance within The Cochrane Collaboration and to the decisions made by individual author teams. This paper studies the first 29 overviews published in EBCH.

Objectives

To describe some aspects of the approaches taken in EBCH overviews to producing evidence syntheses relevant to the healthcare needs of children; to highlight the contribution that overviews can make to the knowledge base for treatment for a particular population.

Methods

Data was extracted on: whether the overview included systematic review (SR) data only, or also data from individual trials not present in the included SRs; name(s) of the Cochrane Review Group (CRG) that prepared the included SRs; topics of the overviews as compared to the topics of the included reviews; age-subgroup analyses presented in the overviews.

Results

In 23 overviews, all published in 2012, the authors included trial data as well as SR data; two overviews addressed conditions not explicitly addressed by the included reviews; three overviews included pre-specified age-subgroup analyses.

Discussion

The aim of clinical relevance has been achieved by means such as: drawing from reviews produced by multiple CRGs; using SR evidence to explore clinically relevant topics that may not match exactly with the topics covered by the SRs; ensuring that the evidence in overviews is as up to date as possible by redoing searches and including trials not incorporated in the included SRs; and, where permitted by the data, using age-subgroup analyses to present the data in a way which matches the stages of childhood development.

Conclusion

Overview authors are dependent on the nature of the data and methods reported in the included SRs. This suggests a need for further study about how SRs could be conducted in order to facilitate the conduct of overviews. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The Cochrane Collaboration

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童健康综述:证据综合和特定人群的知识库
综述是一种不断发展的证据综合形式。自2006年以来,Cochrane儿童健康领域一直在制作概述,在此期间,由于Cochrane协作组织内部指导的发展以及个别作者团队的决定,所使用的方法发生了变化。本文研究了EBCH上发表的前29篇综述。目的描述EBCH概述中所采取的方法的某些方面,以产生与儿童保健需求相关的证据综合;突出概述对特定人群治疗知识库的贡献。方法数据的提取依据如下:综述是否仅包括系统评价(SR)数据,还是还包括未纳入系统评价的单个试验的数据;编制纳入研究报告的Cochrane综述组(CRG)的名称;将概述的主题与纳入的综述的主题进行比较;年龄亚组分析在概述中提出。结果在2012年发表的23篇综述中,作者既纳入了试验数据,也纳入了SR数据;两个概述涉及纳入的综述未明确涉及的条件;三个概述包括预先指定的年龄亚组分析。临床相关性的目的是通过以下方式实现的:从多个crg产生的综述中提取;使用SR证据来探索可能与SR涵盖的主题不完全匹配的临床相关主题;通过重新检索和纳入未纳入纳入的SRs的试验,确保概述中的证据尽可能是最新的;并且,在数据允许的情况下,使用年龄分组分析以符合儿童发展阶段的方式呈现数据。综述作者取决于纳入的SRs中报告的数据和方法的性质。这表明有必要进一步研究如何进行特别报告,以促进进行概述。版权所有©2013科克伦协作网。John Wiley &出版;儿子,有限公司科克伦协作组
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials Pros and cons … Formoterol or salmeterol for asthma—should they be used as monotherapy? Interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1