Causes of historically low abstract submissions for the ASCLS annual meeting.

Michelle Butina, Lester G Pretlow, Barbara Sawyer, Frank J Scarano, Joan Polancic
{"title":"Causes of historically low abstract submissions for the ASCLS annual meeting.","authors":"Michelle Butina,&nbsp;Lester G Pretlow,&nbsp;Barbara Sawyer,&nbsp;Frank J Scarano,&nbsp;Joan Polancic","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Abstract Review Committee (ARC) has an ongoing objective of encouraging abstract submissions for the American Society of Clinical Laboratory Science's (ASCLS) Annual Meeting. The purpose of this research study was to survey ASCLS members to determine the cause of historically low abstract submissions and how submissions could be increased. An electronic survey was developed and sent to ASCLS members via electronic mail blast. The survey focused on five areas: 1) participant demographics, 2) positives and negatives of the current submission and review process, 3) suggestions for improvement, 4) barriers to participation, and 5) level of attendance at poster and oral presentation sessions at annual meetings. Results of the survey indicated that the foremost reason cited for not submitting an abstract was lack of active research. The ARC believes limited research activity is due to the lack of educational preparedness of educators and practitioners to conduct research.</p>","PeriodicalId":72611,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology","volume":"26 2","pages":"100-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Abstract Review Committee (ARC) has an ongoing objective of encouraging abstract submissions for the American Society of Clinical Laboratory Science's (ASCLS) Annual Meeting. The purpose of this research study was to survey ASCLS members to determine the cause of historically low abstract submissions and how submissions could be increased. An electronic survey was developed and sent to ASCLS members via electronic mail blast. The survey focused on five areas: 1) participant demographics, 2) positives and negatives of the current submission and review process, 3) suggestions for improvement, 4) barriers to participation, and 5) level of attendance at poster and oral presentation sessions at annual meetings. Results of the survey indicated that the foremost reason cited for not submitting an abstract was lack of active research. The ARC believes limited research activity is due to the lack of educational preparedness of educators and practitioners to conduct research.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ASCLS年会提交摘要的历史低水平的原因。
摘要审查委员会(ARC)有一个持续的目标,鼓励提交美国临床实验室科学学会(ASCLS)年会的摘要。本研究的目的是调查ASCLS成员,以确定历史低摘要提交的原因以及如何增加提交。制定了一份电子调查,并通过电子邮件群发给ASCLS成员。调查集中在五个方面:1)参与者人口统计,2)当前提交和审查过程的积极和消极,3)改进建议,4)参与的障碍,5)年度会议海报和口头演讲环节的出席程度。调查结果显示,不提交摘要的首要原因是缺乏积极的研究。ARC认为,有限的研究活动是由于教育工作者和实践者缺乏进行研究的教育准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laboratory Findings in Hematology, Clinical Chemistry, and Urinalysis for Patients With Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura The CF Quantum Sweat Test: Not Ready for Clinical Use The Efficacy and Acceptance of Brief Intentional Teachings to Encourage Success Virtual Learning: The Development of Case Study Based Lab Simulation in the Clinical Laboratory Science Undergraduate Curriculum Pilot Program in Clinical Microbiology Laboratory Simulation for MLS Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1