Managing and exploiting routinely collected NHS data for research.

Vasa Curcin, Michael Soljak, Azeem Majeed
{"title":"Managing and exploiting routinely collected NHS data for research.","authors":"Vasa Curcin,&nbsp;Michael Soljak,&nbsp;Azeem Majeed","doi":"10.14236/jhi.v20i4.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health research using routinely collected National Health Service (NHS) data derived from electronic health records (EHRs) and health service information systems has been growing in both importance and quantity. Wide population coverage and detailed patient-level information allow this data to be applied to a variety of research questions. However, the sensitivity, complexity and scale of such data also hamper researchers from fully exploiting this potential.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Here, we establish the current challenges preventing researchers from making optimal use of the data sets at their disposal, on both the legislative and practical levels, and give recommendations as to how these challenges can be overcome.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A number of projects has recently been launched in the UK to address poor research data-management practices. Rapid Organisation of Healthcare Research Data (ROHRD) at Imperial College, London produced a useful prototype that provides local researchers with a one-stop index of available data sets together with relevant metadata.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Increased transparency of data sets' availability and their provenance leads to better utilisation and facilitates compliance with regulatory requirements.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Research data resulting from NHS data is often not utilised fully, or is handled in a haphazard manner that prevents full auditability of the research. Furthermore, lack of informatics and data management skills in research teams act as a barrier to implementing more advanced practices, such as provenance capture and detailed, regularly updated, data management strategies. Only by a concerted effort at the levels of research organisations, funding bodies and publishers, can we achieve full transparency and reproducibility of the research.</p>","PeriodicalId":30591,"journal":{"name":"Informatics in Primary Care","volume":"20 4","pages":"225-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics in Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v20i4.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Introduction: Health research using routinely collected National Health Service (NHS) data derived from electronic health records (EHRs) and health service information systems has been growing in both importance and quantity. Wide population coverage and detailed patient-level information allow this data to be applied to a variety of research questions. However, the sensitivity, complexity and scale of such data also hamper researchers from fully exploiting this potential.

Objective: Here, we establish the current challenges preventing researchers from making optimal use of the data sets at their disposal, on both the legislative and practical levels, and give recommendations as to how these challenges can be overcome.

Method: A number of projects has recently been launched in the UK to address poor research data-management practices. Rapid Organisation of Healthcare Research Data (ROHRD) at Imperial College, London produced a useful prototype that provides local researchers with a one-stop index of available data sets together with relevant metadata.

Findings: Increased transparency of data sets' availability and their provenance leads to better utilisation and facilitates compliance with regulatory requirements.

Discussion: Research data resulting from NHS data is often not utilised fully, or is handled in a haphazard manner that prevents full auditability of the research. Furthermore, lack of informatics and data management skills in research teams act as a barrier to implementing more advanced practices, such as provenance capture and detailed, regularly updated, data management strategies. Only by a concerted effort at the levels of research organisations, funding bodies and publishers, can we achieve full transparency and reproducibility of the research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理和利用常规收集的NHS数据进行研究。
导读:利用电子健康记录(EHRs)和卫生服务信息系统中常规收集的国民健康服务(NHS)数据进行卫生研究的重要性和数量都在不断增长。广泛的人口覆盖范围和详细的患者水平信息使这些数据可以应用于各种研究问题。然而,这些数据的敏感性、复杂性和规模也阻碍了研究人员充分利用这一潜力。目的:在这里,我们建立了当前的挑战,阻止研究人员在立法和实践层面上充分利用他们所掌握的数据集,并就如何克服这些挑战提出建议。方法:最近在英国启动了一些项目,以解决不良的研究数据管理实践。伦敦帝国理工学院的医疗保健研究数据快速组织(ROHRD)产生了一个有用的原型,为当地研究人员提供了可用数据集以及相关元数据的一站式索引。研究发现:数据集的可用性及其来源的透明度增加,可以更好地利用并促进遵守监管要求。讨论:来自NHS数据的研究数据通常没有被充分利用,或者以一种随意的方式处理,从而阻止了研究的完全可审计性。此外,研究团队缺乏信息学和数据管理技能是实施更先进实践的障碍,例如来源捕获和详细的、定期更新的数据管理策略。只有通过研究机构、资助机构和出版商的共同努力,我们才能实现研究的完全透明和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring an informed decision-making framework using in-home sensors: older adults' perceptions. Undertaking sociotechnical evaluations of health information technologies. Privacy protection for personal health information and shared care records. Coding errors in an analysis of the impact of pay-for-performance on the care for long-term cardiovascular disease: a case study. Effective pseudonymisation and explicit statements of public interest to ensure the benefits of sharing health data for research, quality improvement and health service management outweigh the risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1