Intradiverticular ampulla of vater: personal experience at ERCP.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-07-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/102571
Girolamo Geraci, Giuseppe Modica, Carmelo Sciumè, Antonio Sciuto
{"title":"Intradiverticular ampulla of vater: personal experience at ERCP.","authors":"Girolamo Geraci,&nbsp;Giuseppe Modica,&nbsp;Carmelo Sciumè,&nbsp;Antonio Sciuto","doi":"10.1155/2013/102571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction. Conflicting results have been reported about the true impact of intradiverticula ampulla (IA) on the technical success and complication rate of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patients. A total of 500 patients who underwent ERCP were divided into two groups according to the presence (group A, 81 patients) or absence (group B, 419 patients) of IA. Success rate, difficulty at cannulation, findings at ERCP, and procedure-related complications were retrospectively reviewed. Results. Successful cannulation was achieved in 100% of group A patients compared to 98% of group B patients (P = ns). There was a significant difference in the type of cannulation that was routinary in group B (P < 0.05), while requiring guidewire in group A (P < 0.05). Cholangitis (P < 0.05), microstones (P < 0.01), dilated common bile duct without stones (P < 0.01), stone recurrence (P < 0.01), and transient postprocedure hyperamylasemia (P < 0.01) were more frequently observed in group A. There was no significant difference in complication rate between both groups. Conclusions. The finding of an IA at ERCP should not be considered a predictor for failed cannulation. IA is associated with post-ERCP transient hyperamylasemia and is a risk factor for biliary stone disease and its recurrence. </p>","PeriodicalId":11288,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy","volume":"2013 ","pages":"102571"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/102571","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/102571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Introduction. Conflicting results have been reported about the true impact of intradiverticula ampulla (IA) on the technical success and complication rate of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patients. A total of 500 patients who underwent ERCP were divided into two groups according to the presence (group A, 81 patients) or absence (group B, 419 patients) of IA. Success rate, difficulty at cannulation, findings at ERCP, and procedure-related complications were retrospectively reviewed. Results. Successful cannulation was achieved in 100% of group A patients compared to 98% of group B patients (P = ns). There was a significant difference in the type of cannulation that was routinary in group B (P < 0.05), while requiring guidewire in group A (P < 0.05). Cholangitis (P < 0.05), microstones (P < 0.01), dilated common bile duct without stones (P < 0.01), stone recurrence (P < 0.01), and transient postprocedure hyperamylasemia (P < 0.01) were more frequently observed in group A. There was no significant difference in complication rate between both groups. Conclusions. The finding of an IA at ERCP should not be considered a predictor for failed cannulation. IA is associated with post-ERCP transient hyperamylasemia and is a risk factor for biliary stone disease and its recurrence.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
垂直壶腹:ERCP的个人经验。
介绍。壶腹椎体内(IA)对内窥镜逆行胆管胰胆管造影(ERCP)的技术成功率和并发症发生率的真正影响,已经报道了相互矛盾的结果。病人。500例ERCP患者根据有无IA (A组81例)和有无IA (B组419例)分为两组。回顾性回顾了成功率、插管困难、ERCP检查结果和手术相关并发症。结果。A组患者插管成功率为100%,B组为98% (P = ns)。B组常规置管方式与a组导丝置管方式差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。a组以胆管炎(P < 0.05)、微结石(P < 0.01)、胆总管扩张无结石(P < 0.01)、结石复发(P < 0.01)、术后一过性高淀粉酶血症(P < 0.01)多见,两组并发症发生率无显著差异。结论。在ERCP上发现IA不应被认为是插管失败的预测因素。IA与ercp后一过性高淀粉酶血症相关,是胆结石疾病及其复发的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retracted: Comparison of Two Entry Methods for Laparoscopic Port Entry: Technical Point of View Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography for Evaluation of Lymph Nodes: A Single Center Experience. Unsuspected Small-Bowel Crohn's Disease in Elderly Patients Diagnosed by Video Capsule Endoscopy. Use of 4-Fr versus 6-Fr Nasobiliary Catheter for Biliary Drainage: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study. Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of EUS Needles for Liver Biopsy: Ex Vivo Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1