In response to “The Knowledge of Our Knowledge”: 2 decades and not much has changed

Q3 Health Professions Journal of Chiropractic Humanities Pub Date : 2012-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.echu.2012.10.004
Louis Sportelli DC
{"title":"In response to “The Knowledge of Our Knowledge”: 2 decades and not much has changed","authors":"Louis Sportelli DC","doi":"10.1016/j.echu.2012.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The chiropractic<span><span> profession has struggled with how it is viewed and perceived by those within the profession and the powerful forces outside the profession. This commentary suggests that the vast majority of professional unrest is largely due to lines drawn upon philosophical boundaries and how we perceive what we know. For the profession to advance, it is imperative that unsubstantiated claims are eliminated from our justification for being and that we continue to test theories using scientific methods. Theories espoused must be able to be supported by valid research, and we must be ready to accept the results of these investigations and either build upon that body of research or accept the findings and move in alternative directions that science will take us. In doing so, we will contribute to the philosophy of health and perhaps help to change the </span>health care paradigm from disease focused to wellness, which is based upon evidence and not emotion.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":39103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","volume":"19 1","pages":"Pages 40-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2012.10.004","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155634991200006X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The chiropractic profession has struggled with how it is viewed and perceived by those within the profession and the powerful forces outside the profession. This commentary suggests that the vast majority of professional unrest is largely due to lines drawn upon philosophical boundaries and how we perceive what we know. For the profession to advance, it is imperative that unsubstantiated claims are eliminated from our justification for being and that we continue to test theories using scientific methods. Theories espoused must be able to be supported by valid research, and we must be ready to accept the results of these investigations and either build upon that body of research or accept the findings and move in alternative directions that science will take us. In doing so, we will contribute to the philosophy of health and perhaps help to change the health care paradigm from disease focused to wellness, which is based upon evidence and not emotion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对于《我们知识的知识》的回应是:20年了,变化不大
脊椎指压治疗行业一直在努力解决业内人士和行业外强大力量对其的看法和看法。这篇评论表明,绝大多数职业动荡在很大程度上是由于哲学界限和我们如何看待我们所知道的。为了这个专业的进步,我们必须从存在的理由中剔除未经证实的主张,并继续用科学的方法检验理论。所支持的理论必须能够得到有效研究的支持,我们必须准备好接受这些调查的结果,要么建立在研究的基础上,要么接受这些发现,并朝着科学将带我们走向的另一个方向前进。在这样做的过程中,我们将为健康哲学做出贡献,也许有助于将卫生保健范式从以疾病为重点转变为以证据而不是情感为基础的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Masthead Table of Contents Ed Board Research Trends in Dry Needling for Neck Pain Treatment: A Bibliometric Analysis Library as a Therapeutic Landscape Promoting Health and Well-Being to Chiropractic Students: A Descriptive Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1