Detailed analysis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients: a single-center, retrospective study.

ISRN Hematology Pub Date : 2013-07-30 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/908191
Murat Ozbalak, M Cem Ar, Nukhet Tuzuner, Ayse Salihoglu, A Emre Eskazan, Seniz Ongoren Aydin, Zafer Baslar, Teoman Soysal, Yildiz Aydin, Anil Barak Dolgun, Onder Ergonul, Burhan Ferhanoglu
{"title":"Detailed analysis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients: a single-center, retrospective study.","authors":"Murat Ozbalak,&nbsp;M Cem Ar,&nbsp;Nukhet Tuzuner,&nbsp;Ayse Salihoglu,&nbsp;A Emre Eskazan,&nbsp;Seniz Ongoren Aydin,&nbsp;Zafer Baslar,&nbsp;Teoman Soysal,&nbsp;Yildiz Aydin,&nbsp;Anil Barak Dolgun,&nbsp;Onder Ergonul,&nbsp;Burhan Ferhanoglu","doi":"10.1155/2013/908191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this single-center, retrospective study was to investigate the impact of rituximab, reconsider the validity of International Prognostic Index (IPI), and evaluate the prognostic role of the cell of origin (CoO) in a relatively young cohort. Three hundred twelve diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients (median age: 52) were included. Rituximab significantly improved the 3- and 5-year progression free survival (PFS) (70% versus 65% and 41% versus 36%, resp.; P < 0.001) but led only to a slight, insignificant increase in 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) (71% versus 77.3% and %67 versus 74.5%, resp.; P = 0.264). In the young, low risk patient subgroup (aaIPI = 0&1; n = 129), rituximab improved 3- and 5-year PFS and OS rates (P < 0.001 and P = 0.048, resp.). The efficacy of rituximab in young high risk patients was comparable to the literature. CoO data were available in 190 patients. The OS at 3 years was 79% for GC and 64% for non-GC subgroups (P = 0.014). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study which investigated the impact of R-CHOP in the context of CoO and IPI in a relatively young cohort. CoO was not an independent risk factor for prognosis in the multivariate analysis although patients with GC showed a significant survival advantage in the univariate analysis. CoO was also found to be a significant determinant of response in refractory/relapsed patients. Our results confirm the efficacy of rituximab in low and high risk, young patients outside of a randomized clinical trial setting. </p>","PeriodicalId":14727,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Hematology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"908191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/908191","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/908191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The aim of this single-center, retrospective study was to investigate the impact of rituximab, reconsider the validity of International Prognostic Index (IPI), and evaluate the prognostic role of the cell of origin (CoO) in a relatively young cohort. Three hundred twelve diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients (median age: 52) were included. Rituximab significantly improved the 3- and 5-year progression free survival (PFS) (70% versus 65% and 41% versus 36%, resp.; P < 0.001) but led only to a slight, insignificant increase in 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) (71% versus 77.3% and %67 versus 74.5%, resp.; P = 0.264). In the young, low risk patient subgroup (aaIPI = 0&1; n = 129), rituximab improved 3- and 5-year PFS and OS rates (P < 0.001 and P = 0.048, resp.). The efficacy of rituximab in young high risk patients was comparable to the literature. CoO data were available in 190 patients. The OS at 3 years was 79% for GC and 64% for non-GC subgroups (P = 0.014). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study which investigated the impact of R-CHOP in the context of CoO and IPI in a relatively young cohort. CoO was not an independent risk factor for prognosis in the multivariate analysis although patients with GC showed a significant survival advantage in the univariate analysis. CoO was also found to be a significant determinant of response in refractory/relapsed patients. Our results confirm the efficacy of rituximab in low and high risk, young patients outside of a randomized clinical trial setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的详细分析:单中心回顾性研究。
这项单中心回顾性研究的目的是调查利妥昔单抗的影响,重新考虑国际预后指数(IPI)的有效性,并评估起源细胞(CoO)在相对年轻的队列中的预后作用。312例弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者(中位年龄:52岁)纳入研究。利妥昔单抗显著改善了3年和5年无进展生存率(PFS)(分别为70%对65%和41%对36%;P < 0.001),但仅导致3年和5年总生存率(OS)的轻微,不显著的增加(71%对77.3%,%67对74.5%);P = 0.264)。年轻、低危患者亚组(aaIPI = 0&1;n = 129),利妥昔单抗改善了3年和5年的PFS和OS率(P < 0.001和P = 0.048)。利妥昔单抗在年轻高危患者中的疗效与文献相当。190例患者有CoO数据。GC亚组3年OS为79%,非GC亚组为64% (P = 0.014)。据我们所知,这是第一次在相对年轻的队列中调查R-CHOP在CoO和IPI背景下的影响。在多因素分析中,CoO不是影响预后的独立危险因素,但在单因素分析中,GC患者表现出显著的生存优势。CoO也被发现是难治性/复发患者反应的重要决定因素。我们的研究结果证实了利妥昔单抗在低风险和高风险年轻患者中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preventative effects of caffeic Acid phenyl ester on cadmium intoxication induced hematological and blood coagulation disturbances and hepatorenal damage in rats. Relevant aspects of centrifugation step in the preparation of platelet-rich plasma. Phagocytized neutrophil fragments in the bone marrow: a phenomenon most commonly associated with hodgkin lymphoma. Coexisting iron deficiency anemia and Beta thalassemia trait: effect of iron therapy on red cell parameters and hemoglobin subtypes. Prevalence of deletional alpha thalassemia and sickle gene in a tribal dominated malaria endemic area of eastern India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1