Regression Modeling and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of SNP-Based Pathogenicity Detection Tools for UGT1A1 Gene Mutation.

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Genetics Research International Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-08-13 DOI:10.1155/2013/546909
Fakher Rahim, Hamid Galehdari, Javad Mohammadi-Asl, Najmaldin Saki
{"title":"Regression Modeling and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of SNP-Based Pathogenicity Detection Tools for UGT1A1 Gene Mutation.","authors":"Fakher Rahim,&nbsp;Hamid Galehdari,&nbsp;Javad Mohammadi-Asl,&nbsp;Najmaldin Saki","doi":"10.1155/2013/546909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aims. This review summarized all available evidence on the accuracy of SNP-based pathogenicity detection tools and introduced regression model based on functional scores, mutation score, and genomic variation degree. Materials and Methods. A comprehensive search was performed to find all mutations related to Crigler-Najjar syndrome. The pathogenicity prediction was done using SNP-based pathogenicity detection tools including SIFT, PHD-SNP, PolyPhen2, fathmm, Provean, and Mutpred. Overall, 59 different SNPs related to missense mutations in the UGT1A1 gene, were reviewed. Results. Comparing the diagnostic OR, our model showed high detection potential (diagnostic OR: 16.71, 95% CI: 3.38-82.69). The highest MCC and ACC belonged to our suggested model (46.8% and 73.3%), followed by SIFT (34.19% and 62.71%). The AUC analysis showed a significance overall performance of our suggested model compared to the selected SNP-based pathogenicity detection tool (P = 0.046). Conclusion. Our suggested model is comparable to the well-established SNP-based pathogenicity detection tools that can appropriately reflect the role of a disease-associated SNP in both local and global structures. Although the accuracy of our suggested model is not relatively high, the functional impact of the pathogenic mutations is highlighted at the protein level, which improves the understanding of the molecular basis of mutation pathogenesis. </p>","PeriodicalId":37545,"journal":{"name":"Genetics Research International","volume":"2013 ","pages":"546909"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/546909","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/546909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Aims. This review summarized all available evidence on the accuracy of SNP-based pathogenicity detection tools and introduced regression model based on functional scores, mutation score, and genomic variation degree. Materials and Methods. A comprehensive search was performed to find all mutations related to Crigler-Najjar syndrome. The pathogenicity prediction was done using SNP-based pathogenicity detection tools including SIFT, PHD-SNP, PolyPhen2, fathmm, Provean, and Mutpred. Overall, 59 different SNPs related to missense mutations in the UGT1A1 gene, were reviewed. Results. Comparing the diagnostic OR, our model showed high detection potential (diagnostic OR: 16.71, 95% CI: 3.38-82.69). The highest MCC and ACC belonged to our suggested model (46.8% and 73.3%), followed by SIFT (34.19% and 62.71%). The AUC analysis showed a significance overall performance of our suggested model compared to the selected SNP-based pathogenicity detection tool (P = 0.046). Conclusion. Our suggested model is comparable to the well-established SNP-based pathogenicity detection tools that can appropriately reflect the role of a disease-associated SNP in both local and global structures. Although the accuracy of our suggested model is not relatively high, the functional impact of the pathogenic mutations is highlighted at the protein level, which improves the understanding of the molecular basis of mutation pathogenesis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于snp的UGT1A1基因突变致病性检测工具诊断准确性的回归建模与meta分析
目标本文综述了基于snp的致病性检测工具的准确性,并介绍了基于功能评分、突变评分和基因组变异程度的回归模型。材料与方法。进行了全面的搜索,以找到与克里格勒-纳贾尔综合征相关的所有突变。采用SIFT、PHD-SNP、PolyPhen2、fathmm、Provean和Mutpred等基于snp的致病性检测工具进行致病性预测。总的来说,我们回顾了59个与UGT1A1基因错义突变相关的不同snp。结果。与诊断OR相比,我们的模型显示出较高的检测潜力(诊断OR: 16.71, 95% CI: 3.38-82.69)。MCC和ACC最高,分别为46.8%和73.3%,其次是SIFT,分别为34.19%和62.71%。AUC分析显示,与选择的基于snp的致病性检测工具相比,我们建议的模型总体性能显著(P = 0.046)。结论。我们建议的模型与基于SNP的成熟致病性检测工具相当,可以适当地反映疾病相关SNP在局部和全局结构中的作用。虽然我们提出的模型的准确性不是很高,但在蛋白质水平上突出了致病突变的功能影响,提高了对突变发病的分子基础的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genetics Research International
Genetics Research International Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Genetics Research International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles in all areas of genetics and genomics. The journal focuses on articles bearing on heredity, biochemistry, and molecular biology, as well as clinical findings.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Some Genetic Risk Factors for Nicotine Dependence in Ukraine. MEFV Gene Variant Alleles in Normal Population of Northwest of Iran, Which Is Near to Mediterranean Sea Lack of Association between Variant rs7916697 in ATOH7 and Primary Open Angle Glaucoma in a Saudi Cohort. Phenotypic Nonspecificity as the Result of Limited Specificity of Transcription Factor Function. CRISPR/Cas9 System: A Bacterial Tailor for Genomic Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1