A new cervical nerve root avulsion model using a posterior extra-vertebral approach in rats.

Takashi Noguchi, Souichi Ohta, Ryosuke Kakinoki, Yukitoshi Kaizawa, Shuichi Matsuda
{"title":"A new cervical nerve root avulsion model using a posterior extra-vertebral approach in rats.","authors":"Takashi Noguchi,&nbsp;Souichi Ohta,&nbsp;Ryosuke Kakinoki,&nbsp;Yukitoshi Kaizawa,&nbsp;Shuichi Matsuda","doi":"10.1186/1749-7221-8-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The nerve root avulsion injury causes decrease of motor neurons in the spinal ventral horn. To investigate the motoneuron death after avulsion injury in rats, the intradural root avulsion procedure is usually used, although it is technically demanding and associated with a risk of unexpected spinal cord damage. We have developed a new cervical nerve root avulsion procedure in rats and investigated the validity of our procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our procedure is using a posterior approach and pulling the C6 nerve root outside the vertebral foramen without intradural procedures. The lateral third of the lateral mass is needed to be resected before pulling the nerve root. The accomplishment of our procedure is judged by confirmation of the bifurcated stump of the avulsed nerve root and the leakage of the spinal fluid from vertebral foramen. At first, four Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were used for the examination of C6 motor neuron distribution in the normal spinal cord. Then, 40 SD rats were divided into following four groups and the survival rate of motor neuron was examined. (A) an intradural avulsion group, (B) an intradural rhizotomy group, (C) our extravertebral avulsion group, and (D) an extravertebral rupture group. Another 26 SD rats were used for the examination of histomorphorogic changes in the spinal cord after our extra-vertebral avulsion procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 28 days after injury, the percentage of surviving motor neurons in groups A (39.0 ± 2.1%) and C (47.5 ± 7.1%) were significantly lower than those in groups B (77.1 ± 12.3%) and D (98.9 ± 9.9%). Compared with other groups, our procedure was easier and associated with less unexpected spinal cord damage. Although the length of the distal stump of the extravertebrally avulsed ventral rootlets was varied between 1.5 and 3.2 mm, this difference did not affect motoneuron death. The extravertebral avulsion injury showed intraspinal bleeding along the motoneuron axons, glial reaction and macrophage infiltration in the lesioned side of the ventral horn.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our extravertebral avulsion procedure is simple and reproducible. It would become a useful tool for the study of cervical nerve root avulsion injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":15280,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury","volume":"8 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1749-7221-8-8","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7221-8-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: The nerve root avulsion injury causes decrease of motor neurons in the spinal ventral horn. To investigate the motoneuron death after avulsion injury in rats, the intradural root avulsion procedure is usually used, although it is technically demanding and associated with a risk of unexpected spinal cord damage. We have developed a new cervical nerve root avulsion procedure in rats and investigated the validity of our procedure.

Methods: Our procedure is using a posterior approach and pulling the C6 nerve root outside the vertebral foramen without intradural procedures. The lateral third of the lateral mass is needed to be resected before pulling the nerve root. The accomplishment of our procedure is judged by confirmation of the bifurcated stump of the avulsed nerve root and the leakage of the spinal fluid from vertebral foramen. At first, four Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were used for the examination of C6 motor neuron distribution in the normal spinal cord. Then, 40 SD rats were divided into following four groups and the survival rate of motor neuron was examined. (A) an intradural avulsion group, (B) an intradural rhizotomy group, (C) our extravertebral avulsion group, and (D) an extravertebral rupture group. Another 26 SD rats were used for the examination of histomorphorogic changes in the spinal cord after our extra-vertebral avulsion procedure.

Results: At 28 days after injury, the percentage of surviving motor neurons in groups A (39.0 ± 2.1%) and C (47.5 ± 7.1%) were significantly lower than those in groups B (77.1 ± 12.3%) and D (98.9 ± 9.9%). Compared with other groups, our procedure was easier and associated with less unexpected spinal cord damage. Although the length of the distal stump of the extravertebrally avulsed ventral rootlets was varied between 1.5 and 3.2 mm, this difference did not affect motoneuron death. The extravertebral avulsion injury showed intraspinal bleeding along the motoneuron axons, glial reaction and macrophage infiltration in the lesioned side of the ventral horn.

Conclusions: Our extravertebral avulsion procedure is simple and reproducible. It would become a useful tool for the study of cervical nerve root avulsion injury.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用椎外后路入路建立大鼠颈神经根撕脱伤新模型。
背景:神经根撕脱伤引起脊髓前角运动神经元减少。为了研究大鼠撕脱伤后运动神经元的死亡,通常采用硬膜内根撕脱术,尽管该手术技术要求高,且有意外脊髓损伤的风险。我们开发了一种新的大鼠颈神经根撕脱术,并对该手术的有效性进行了研究。方法:我们的手术采用后路,在椎孔外牵拉C6神经根,无需硬膜内手术。在拉动神经根之前,需要切除外侧肿块的外侧三分之一。我们的手术的完成是通过确认撕脱的神经根分叉残端和从椎孔漏出的脊髓液来判断的。首先取4只SD大鼠,观察正常脊髓C6运动神经元的分布。将40只SD大鼠分为4组,观察运动神经元的存活率。(A)硬膜内撕脱组,(B)硬膜内根切开术组,(C)椎外撕脱组,(D)椎外破裂组。另取26只SD大鼠进行椎外撕脱术后脊髓组织形态学变化检查。结果:损伤后28 D, A组(39.0±2.1%)和C组(47.5±7.1%)的运动神经元存活率显著低于B组(77.1±12.3%)和D组(98.9±9.9%)。与其他组相比,我们的手术更简单,并且与较少的意外脊髓损伤相关。尽管椎外撕脱的腹侧小根远端残端长度在1.5 ~ 3.2 mm之间,但这种差异并不影响运动神经元的死亡。椎外撕脱伤表现为沿运动神经元轴突的椎内出血、神经胶质反应和腹角病变侧巨噬细胞浸润。结论:我们的椎外撕脱术操作简单,可重复性好。为颈椎神经根撕脱伤的研究提供了有益的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JBPPNI is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that will encompass all aspects of basic and clinical research findings, in the area of brachial plexus and peripheral nerve injury. Injury in this context refers to congenital, inflammatory, traumatic, degenerative and neoplastic processes, including neurofibromatosis. Papers on diagnostic and imaging aspects of the peripheral nervous system are welcomed as well. The peripheral nervous system is unique in its complexity and scope of influence. There are areas of interest in the anatomy, physiology, metabolism, phylogeny, and limb growth tropism of peripheral nerves.
期刊最新文献
Traumatic Upper Extremity Nerve Lesions in Children: High-Resolution Nerve Ultrasound Can Improve Surgical Outcome. Fascicular Injury in True Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Associated with Manual and Shockwave Therapies: A Case Report. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 50 Most Cited Articles on Iatrogenic Nerve Injuries of the Upper Limb Following Surgery. Use of a Pedicled Vascularized Ulnar Nerve as a Long Graft for Complete Brachial Plexus Palsy in Adults to Restore Elbow Flexion: Should this Practice Continue? Fracture Patterns and Peripheral Brachial Plexus Injury in Humerus Fractures: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1