Binocular vision interference from unequal inputs in an adult patient with monocular dense acquired cataract.

Felisa Shokida, Lora T Likova, Magali Alvarez, Tomas Cubero, Alberto Ciancia
{"title":"Binocular vision interference from unequal inputs in an adult patient with monocular dense acquired cataract.","authors":"Felisa Shokida,&nbsp;Lora T Likova,&nbsp;Magali Alvarez,&nbsp;Tomas Cubero,&nbsp;Alberto Ciancia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The effect of the unequal visual inputs in uniocular cataracts is addressed through the hypothesis that a marked inequality of the visual inputs will have an interference effect that will degrade the binocular vision relative to that of the better eye. We tested this hypothesis of reverse interference effect by both clinical and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging assessments in an acute unilateral cataract patient. The patient was 63 year old woman who rapidly developed a dense sub-capsular cataract following steroid radio-chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical: Ophthalmologic evaluation and distance visual acuity (both uniocular and binocular), contrast sensitivity, binocular function, ocular motility and cover test to evaluate the presence of strabismus, and a slit lamp assessment of cataract density were performed. Neuroimaging: Functional MRI was run in a 1.5T Philips Intera Master with a SENSE neurovascular coil of 8 channels. The experimental design included three conditions: a) Binocular: both eyes viewing; b) OS-mono: left eye viewing, right eye occluded by a black cover; c) OD-mono: right eye viewing, left eye occluded by a black cover.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical: The logMAR visual acuity was 0.9 OD, hand movement at one meter OS, and 0.7 for binocular viewing, that is, the binocular acuity was worse than the better eye acuity alone. As hypothesized, adding a diffuser lens and a penlight glare on the cataract eye increased the interference signal from that eye, and thus further reduced the binocular acuity to 0.4. Binocular contrast sensitivity also was worse than the OD alone. Neuroimaging: The fMRI results were consistent with the clinical findings. The number of activated voxels in the visual cortex under binocular viewing was reduced by about 40 percent relative to that for the fellow eye alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical and fMRI data were well-correlated and consistent with the prediction for the marked binocular asymmetry. The results imply that the mechanisms operating under a severe binocular vision asymmetry caused by unilateral diffusion (blur without contour perception, or light perception only) exhibit an interference effect under binocular viewing that is not seen in the case of weaker asymmetry such as in functional amblyopia, or from the extreme case of total elimination of visual input from one eye, such as in occlusion or monocular blindness.</p>","PeriodicalId":72356,"journal":{"name":"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The effect of the unequal visual inputs in uniocular cataracts is addressed through the hypothesis that a marked inequality of the visual inputs will have an interference effect that will degrade the binocular vision relative to that of the better eye. We tested this hypothesis of reverse interference effect by both clinical and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging assessments in an acute unilateral cataract patient. The patient was 63 year old woman who rapidly developed a dense sub-capsular cataract following steroid radio-chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer.

Methods: Clinical: Ophthalmologic evaluation and distance visual acuity (both uniocular and binocular), contrast sensitivity, binocular function, ocular motility and cover test to evaluate the presence of strabismus, and a slit lamp assessment of cataract density were performed. Neuroimaging: Functional MRI was run in a 1.5T Philips Intera Master with a SENSE neurovascular coil of 8 channels. The experimental design included three conditions: a) Binocular: both eyes viewing; b) OS-mono: left eye viewing, right eye occluded by a black cover; c) OD-mono: right eye viewing, left eye occluded by a black cover.

Results: Clinical: The logMAR visual acuity was 0.9 OD, hand movement at one meter OS, and 0.7 for binocular viewing, that is, the binocular acuity was worse than the better eye acuity alone. As hypothesized, adding a diffuser lens and a penlight glare on the cataract eye increased the interference signal from that eye, and thus further reduced the binocular acuity to 0.4. Binocular contrast sensitivity also was worse than the OD alone. Neuroimaging: The fMRI results were consistent with the clinical findings. The number of activated voxels in the visual cortex under binocular viewing was reduced by about 40 percent relative to that for the fellow eye alone.

Conclusion: Clinical and fMRI data were well-correlated and consistent with the prediction for the marked binocular asymmetry. The results imply that the mechanisms operating under a severe binocular vision asymmetry caused by unilateral diffusion (blur without contour perception, or light perception only) exhibit an interference effect under binocular viewing that is not seen in the case of weaker asymmetry such as in functional amblyopia, or from the extreme case of total elimination of visual input from one eye, such as in occlusion or monocular blindness.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人单眼致密性白内障患者双眼视觉干扰的不均匀输入。
引言:单眼白内障视觉输入不均等的影响是通过视觉输入明显不均等会产生干扰效应的假设来解决的,这种干扰效应会使双眼视力相对于正常眼睛的视力下降。我们通过对一位急性单侧白内障患者的临床和功能性磁共振成像评估来检验这种反向干扰效应的假设。患者是一名63岁的女性,她在接受类固醇放化疗治疗乳腺癌后迅速发展为致密的囊下白内障。方法:临床:采用眼科学评价、单眼和双眼的距离视力、对比敏感度、双眼功能、眼运动、覆盖试验评价斜视是否存在,裂隙灯评价白内障密度。神经影像学:在1.5T Philips Intera Master上进行功能性MRI,使用8通道SENSE神经血管线圈。实验设计包括三种条件:a)双眼:双眼观看;b) OS-mono:左眼观看,右眼被黑色罩遮挡;c) OD-mono:右眼观看,左眼被黑罩遮挡。结果:临床:logMAR视力为0.9 OD,手在1米OS处运动,双眼视力为0.7,即双眼视力差于单纯的好眼视力。根据假设,在白内障眼上增加扩散透镜和笔光眩光增加了来自该眼的干涉信号,从而进一步将双眼锐度降低到0.4。双眼对比敏感度也比单纯OD差。神经影像学:功能磁共振成像结果与临床表现一致。与单眼观看相比,双眼观看时,视觉皮层中激活的体素数量减少了约40%。结论:临床与fMRI数据具有良好的相关性,与双眼不对称的预测一致。结果表明,在单侧扩散引起的严重双眼视觉不对称(模糊无轮廓感知,或仅光感知)下运作的机制在双眼观看时表现出干扰效应,而在功能性弱视等较弱不对称的情况下,或在单眼完全消除视觉输入的极端情况下,如闭塞或单眼失明,则不会出现这种干扰效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pediatric photoscreeners in high risk patients 2012: a comparison study of Plusoptix, Iscreen and SPOT. Near Point of Accommodation and Convergence after Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) for Myopia. Retinitis pigmentosa and granular dystrophy: a rare and unique combination in one patient. Effects of atropine on the accommodative system: parameters to consider in its use for penalization treatment of amblyopia. 3D Printing Live Stem Cells; Hobbit in 3D; Super "Retina Displya"; Your Microbiome; Hospitals Takeover; Income Taxes; Bicyclists; Deer Dangers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1