Acceptance and practicability of a visual communication tool in smoking cessation counselling: a randomised controlled trial.

Stefan Neuner-Jehle, Marianne I Knecht, Claudia Stey-Steurer, Oliver Senn
{"title":"Acceptance and practicability of a visual communication tool in smoking cessation counselling: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Stefan Neuner-Jehle,&nbsp;Marianne I Knecht,&nbsp;Claudia Stey-Steurer,&nbsp;Oliver Senn","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2013.00086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smoking cessation advice is important for reducing the worldwide burden of disease resulting from tobacco smoking. Appropriate risk communication formats improve the success of counselling interventions in primary care.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To test the feasibility and acceptance of a smoking cessation counselling tool with different cardiovascular risk communication formats including graphs, in comparison with the International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) 'quit smoking assistance' tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GPs were randomised into an intervention group (using our communication tool in addition to the IPCRG sheet) and a control group (using the IPCRG sheet only). We asked participants for socioeconomic data, smoking patterns, understanding of information, motivation, acceptance and feasibility, and measured the duration and frequency of counselling sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five GPs performed 2.8 counselling sessions per month in the intervention group and 1.7 in the control group (p=0.3) with 114 patients. The median duration of a session was 10 mins (control group 11 mins, p=0.09 for difference). Median patients' motivation for smoking cessation was 7 on a 10-point visual analogue scale with no significant difference before and after the intervention (p=0.2) or between groups (p=0.73 before and p=0.15 after the intervention). Median patients' ratings of motivation, selfconfidence, understanding of information, and satisfaction with the counselling were 3-5 on a 5-point Likert scale, similar to GPs' ratings of acceptance and feasibility, with no significant difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among Swiss GPs and patients, both our innovative communication tool and the IPCRG tool were well accepted and both merit further dissemination and application in research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00086","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Smoking cessation advice is important for reducing the worldwide burden of disease resulting from tobacco smoking. Appropriate risk communication formats improve the success of counselling interventions in primary care.

Aims: To test the feasibility and acceptance of a smoking cessation counselling tool with different cardiovascular risk communication formats including graphs, in comparison with the International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) 'quit smoking assistance' tool.

Methods: GPs were randomised into an intervention group (using our communication tool in addition to the IPCRG sheet) and a control group (using the IPCRG sheet only). We asked participants for socioeconomic data, smoking patterns, understanding of information, motivation, acceptance and feasibility, and measured the duration and frequency of counselling sessions.

Results: Twenty-five GPs performed 2.8 counselling sessions per month in the intervention group and 1.7 in the control group (p=0.3) with 114 patients. The median duration of a session was 10 mins (control group 11 mins, p=0.09 for difference). Median patients' motivation for smoking cessation was 7 on a 10-point visual analogue scale with no significant difference before and after the intervention (p=0.2) or between groups (p=0.73 before and p=0.15 after the intervention). Median patients' ratings of motivation, selfconfidence, understanding of information, and satisfaction with the counselling were 3-5 on a 5-point Likert scale, similar to GPs' ratings of acceptance and feasibility, with no significant difference between groups.

Conclusions: Among Swiss GPs and patients, both our innovative communication tool and the IPCRG tool were well accepted and both merit further dissemination and application in research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视觉交流工具在戒烟咨询中的接受度和实用性:一项随机对照试验。
背景:戒烟建议对于减轻世界范围内吸烟引起的疾病负担很重要。适当的风险沟通形式可提高初级保健咨询干预措施的成功率。目的:与国际初级保健呼吸系统小组(IPCRG)的“戒烟援助”工具相比,测试具有不同心血管风险沟通格式(包括图表)的戒烟咨询工具的可行性和可接受性。方法:全科医生被随机分为干预组(除了IPCRG表外,还使用我们的沟通工具)和对照组(仅使用IPCRG表格)。我们询问了参与者的社会经济数据、吸烟模式、对信息的理解、动机、接受度和可行性,并测量了咨询会议的持续时间和频率。结果:干预组25名全科医生每月进行2.8次咨询,对照组1.7次(p=0.03),共114名患者。疗程的中位持续时间为10分钟(对照组为11分钟,差异p=0.09)。在10点视觉模拟量表上,患者戒烟动机的中位数为7,干预前后或组间无显著差异(干预前p=0.73,干预后p=0.15)。在5分Likert量表中,患者对动机、自信心、对信息的理解和对咨询的满意度的中位评分为3-5,与全科医生对接受度和可行性的评分相似,各组之间没有显著差异。结论:在瑞士全科医生和患者中,我们的创新沟通工具和IPCRG工具都被广泛接受,都值得在研究中进一步传播和应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Primary Care Respiratory Journal
Primary Care Respiratory Journal PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Management, morbidity and mortality of COPD during an 11-year period: an observational retrospective epidemiological register study in Sweden (PATHOS). Chronic disease co-morbidity of asthma and unscheduled asthma care among adults: results of the national telephone health interview survey German Health Update (GEDA) 2009 and 2010. Transgenerational occurrence of allergic disease and autoimmunity: general practice-based epidemiological research. Are GOLD ABCD groups better associated with health status and costs than GOLD 1234 grades? A cross-sectional study. Indolent pneumonia in a pregnant recent immigrant from Ethiopia: think TB.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1