Clinical significance of lymph node ratio in locally advanced breast cancer molecular subtypes.

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine Onkologie Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-10-14 DOI:10.1159/000355663
Fatih Demircioglu, Umut Demirci, Diclehan Kilic, Secil Ozkan, Eray Karahacioglu
{"title":"Clinical significance of lymph node ratio in locally advanced breast cancer molecular subtypes.","authors":"Fatih Demircioglu,&nbsp;Umut Demirci,&nbsp;Diclehan Kilic,&nbsp;Secil Ozkan,&nbsp;Eray Karahacioglu","doi":"10.1159/000355663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ratio of metastatic to dissected lymph nodes (lymph node ratio; LNR) is a sensitive and superior prognostic factor for lymph node evaluation, but its relationship to cancer subtypes is unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data from 469 patients with axillary lymph node metastasis out of 640 early breast cancer cases were retrospectively analyzed. They were classified into 4 molecular subtypes; luminal A, luminal B HER2(+), HER2 overexpression, basal-like. LNRs were compared between groups and with other prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distribution of LNRs was 35.2% in luminal A, 43.2% in luminal B HER2(+), 46.9% in HER2 over-expression, and 39.1% in basal-like. A significant difference was found between luminal A and HER2 over-expression subtypes (p = 0.023). LNR was significantly correlated with tumor size and lymphovascular invasion, but not with other prognostic factors including menopausal status, laterality, grade, and perineural invasion. An LNR of 29.8% was defined as the cut-off value, and significant differences in survival rates were identified accordingly between basal-like and both luminal A (p = 0.003) and luminal B HER2(+) (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LNR differs between some molecular subtypes of breast cancer, and it correlates with certain prognostic factors and survival. These data support using the LNR to assess breast cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19684,"journal":{"name":"Onkologie","volume":"36 11","pages":"637-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000355663","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000355663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The ratio of metastatic to dissected lymph nodes (lymph node ratio; LNR) is a sensitive and superior prognostic factor for lymph node evaluation, but its relationship to cancer subtypes is unclear.

Patients and methods: Data from 469 patients with axillary lymph node metastasis out of 640 early breast cancer cases were retrospectively analyzed. They were classified into 4 molecular subtypes; luminal A, luminal B HER2(+), HER2 overexpression, basal-like. LNRs were compared between groups and with other prognostic factors.

Results: The distribution of LNRs was 35.2% in luminal A, 43.2% in luminal B HER2(+), 46.9% in HER2 over-expression, and 39.1% in basal-like. A significant difference was found between luminal A and HER2 over-expression subtypes (p = 0.023). LNR was significantly correlated with tumor size and lymphovascular invasion, but not with other prognostic factors including menopausal status, laterality, grade, and perineural invasion. An LNR of 29.8% was defined as the cut-off value, and significant differences in survival rates were identified accordingly between basal-like and both luminal A (p = 0.003) and luminal B HER2(+) (p = 0.04).

Conclusion: The LNR differs between some molecular subtypes of breast cancer, and it correlates with certain prognostic factors and survival. These data support using the LNR to assess breast cancer patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部晚期乳腺癌分子亚型淋巴结比例的临床意义。
背景:淋巴结转移与淋巴结清扫的比例(淋巴结比例;LNR是评估淋巴结的一个敏感和优越的预后因素,但其与癌症亚型的关系尚不清楚。患者与方法:回顾性分析640例早期乳腺癌中469例腋窝淋巴结转移患者的资料。它们被划分为4个分子亚型;管腔A,管腔B HER2(+), HER2过表达,基底样。将LNRs与组间及其他预后因素进行比较。结果:LNRs分布在腔内A区为35.2%,腔内B区为43.2%,HER2过表达区为46.9%,基底样区为39.1%。luminal A和HER2过表达亚型之间存在显著差异(p = 0.023)。LNR与肿瘤大小和淋巴血管浸润显著相关,但与其他预后因素(包括绝经状态、侧边性、分级和神经周围浸润)无关。LNR为29.8%为临界值,据此确定基底样和腔内A (p = 0.003)和腔内B HER2(+) (p = 0.04)的生存率存在显著差异。结论:LNR在不同分子亚型乳腺癌中存在差异,与乳腺癌预后及生存有关。这些数据支持使用LNR来评估乳腺癌患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Onkologie
Onkologie 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer Trends in the treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer Management of adverse reactions during treatment of anal cancer Tinnitus - an initial symptom of synchronous occurence of paraganglioma and renal cell carcinoma in a germline mutation of the SDHB gene (PGL4 snydrome) Hepatoblastoma in three siblings associated with familial adenomatous polyposis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1