Fatih Demircioglu, Umut Demirci, Diclehan Kilic, Secil Ozkan, Eray Karahacioglu
{"title":"Clinical significance of lymph node ratio in locally advanced breast cancer molecular subtypes.","authors":"Fatih Demircioglu, Umut Demirci, Diclehan Kilic, Secil Ozkan, Eray Karahacioglu","doi":"10.1159/000355663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ratio of metastatic to dissected lymph nodes (lymph node ratio; LNR) is a sensitive and superior prognostic factor for lymph node evaluation, but its relationship to cancer subtypes is unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data from 469 patients with axillary lymph node metastasis out of 640 early breast cancer cases were retrospectively analyzed. They were classified into 4 molecular subtypes; luminal A, luminal B HER2(+), HER2 overexpression, basal-like. LNRs were compared between groups and with other prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distribution of LNRs was 35.2% in luminal A, 43.2% in luminal B HER2(+), 46.9% in HER2 over-expression, and 39.1% in basal-like. A significant difference was found between luminal A and HER2 over-expression subtypes (p = 0.023). LNR was significantly correlated with tumor size and lymphovascular invasion, but not with other prognostic factors including menopausal status, laterality, grade, and perineural invasion. An LNR of 29.8% was defined as the cut-off value, and significant differences in survival rates were identified accordingly between basal-like and both luminal A (p = 0.003) and luminal B HER2(+) (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LNR differs between some molecular subtypes of breast cancer, and it correlates with certain prognostic factors and survival. These data support using the LNR to assess breast cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19684,"journal":{"name":"Onkologie","volume":"36 11","pages":"637-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000355663","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000355663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background: The ratio of metastatic to dissected lymph nodes (lymph node ratio; LNR) is a sensitive and superior prognostic factor for lymph node evaluation, but its relationship to cancer subtypes is unclear.
Patients and methods: Data from 469 patients with axillary lymph node metastasis out of 640 early breast cancer cases were retrospectively analyzed. They were classified into 4 molecular subtypes; luminal A, luminal B HER2(+), HER2 overexpression, basal-like. LNRs were compared between groups and with other prognostic factors.
Results: The distribution of LNRs was 35.2% in luminal A, 43.2% in luminal B HER2(+), 46.9% in HER2 over-expression, and 39.1% in basal-like. A significant difference was found between luminal A and HER2 over-expression subtypes (p = 0.023). LNR was significantly correlated with tumor size and lymphovascular invasion, but not with other prognostic factors including menopausal status, laterality, grade, and perineural invasion. An LNR of 29.8% was defined as the cut-off value, and significant differences in survival rates were identified accordingly between basal-like and both luminal A (p = 0.003) and luminal B HER2(+) (p = 0.04).
Conclusion: The LNR differs between some molecular subtypes of breast cancer, and it correlates with certain prognostic factors and survival. These data support using the LNR to assess breast cancer patients.