Patients' perceptions of the potential of breathing training for asthma: a qualitative study.

Emily Arden-Close, Emma Teasdale, Sarah Tonkin-Crine, Natasha Pitre, Mark Stafford-Watson, Denise Gibson, Anne Bruton, Mike Thomas, Lucy Yardley
{"title":"Patients' perceptions of the potential of breathing training for asthma: a qualitative study.","authors":"Emily Arden-Close,&nbsp;Emma Teasdale,&nbsp;Sarah Tonkin-Crine,&nbsp;Natasha Pitre,&nbsp;Mark Stafford-Watson,&nbsp;Denise Gibson,&nbsp;Anne Bruton,&nbsp;Mike Thomas,&nbsp;Lucy Yardley","doi":"10.4104/pcrj.2013.00092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor symptom control is common in asthma. Breathing training exercises may be an effective adjunct to medication; it is therefore important to understand facilitators and barriers to uptake of breathing training exercises.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To gain insight into patients' perceptions of breathing training exercises designed to help control asthma symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured think-aloud interviews were conducted with 29 people with asthma about their views of a booklet on breathing training exercises.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis showed breathing training exercises were seen as acceptable in principle because they were viewed as nonpharmacological, holistic, unobtrusive, and likely to increase patient confidence in managing symptoms. Anticipated disadvantages included the time required and perceived irrelevance for those with well-controlled asthma. These views were influenced by prior experience of changing breathing, wanting to self-manage asthma, negative views of medication, and perceived asthma control/severity. Anticipated barriers to carrying out the exercises included difficulties with nose breathing, remembering to do them, and persevering with them. Anticipated facilitators included monitoring tools and social support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The idea of breathing training was viewed positively as an acceptable non-pharmacological treatment that patients can do discreetly to help them breathe more easily and reduce their reliance on medication. Uptake of breathing training may be greater among those who perceive their asthma as severe and/or have negative views of medication. To enhance uptake, it might be helpful to present breathing training exercises as holistic skills that can also benefit those with mild symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48998,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00092","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2013.00092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: Poor symptom control is common in asthma. Breathing training exercises may be an effective adjunct to medication; it is therefore important to understand facilitators and barriers to uptake of breathing training exercises.

Aims: To gain insight into patients' perceptions of breathing training exercises designed to help control asthma symptoms.

Methods: Semi-structured think-aloud interviews were conducted with 29 people with asthma about their views of a booklet on breathing training exercises.

Results: Thematic analysis showed breathing training exercises were seen as acceptable in principle because they were viewed as nonpharmacological, holistic, unobtrusive, and likely to increase patient confidence in managing symptoms. Anticipated disadvantages included the time required and perceived irrelevance for those with well-controlled asthma. These views were influenced by prior experience of changing breathing, wanting to self-manage asthma, negative views of medication, and perceived asthma control/severity. Anticipated barriers to carrying out the exercises included difficulties with nose breathing, remembering to do them, and persevering with them. Anticipated facilitators included monitoring tools and social support.

Conclusions: The idea of breathing training was viewed positively as an acceptable non-pharmacological treatment that patients can do discreetly to help them breathe more easily and reduce their reliance on medication. Uptake of breathing training may be greater among those who perceive their asthma as severe and/or have negative views of medication. To enhance uptake, it might be helpful to present breathing training exercises as holistic skills that can also benefit those with mild symptoms.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对哮喘呼吸训练潜力的认知:一项定性研究。
背景:症状控制不佳是哮喘的常见病。呼吸训练可能是药物治疗的有效辅助;因此,了解呼吸训练练习的促进因素和障碍是很重要的。目的:深入了解患者对旨在帮助控制哮喘症状的呼吸训练练习的看法。方法:对29例哮喘患者进行半结构化的有声思考访谈,询问他们对呼吸训练练习小册子的看法。结果:专题分析显示,呼吸训练练习在原则上被认为是可以接受的,因为它们被认为是非药物的,整体的,不引人注目的,并且可能增加患者对控制症状的信心。预期的缺点包括所需的时间和对那些控制良好的哮喘患者的感知无关。这些观点受到之前改变呼吸的经历、想要自我管理哮喘、对药物的负面看法以及感知到的哮喘控制/严重程度的影响。进行这些练习的预期障碍包括鼻子呼吸困难、记住做这些练习和坚持做这些练习。预期的促进因素包括监测工具和社会支持。结论:呼吸训练的想法被积极地视为一种可接受的非药物治疗,患者可以谨慎地帮助他们更轻松地呼吸,减少对药物的依赖。在那些认为自己的哮喘很严重和/或对药物有负面看法的人中,呼吸训练的吸收可能更大。为了增强吸收,将呼吸训练练习作为整体技能来呈现可能会有所帮助,这对那些症状轻微的人也有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Primary Care Respiratory Journal
Primary Care Respiratory Journal PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Management, morbidity and mortality of COPD during an 11-year period: an observational retrospective epidemiological register study in Sweden (PATHOS). Chronic disease co-morbidity of asthma and unscheduled asthma care among adults: results of the national telephone health interview survey German Health Update (GEDA) 2009 and 2010. Transgenerational occurrence of allergic disease and autoimmunity: general practice-based epidemiological research. Are GOLD ABCD groups better associated with health status and costs than GOLD 1234 grades? A cross-sectional study. Indolent pneumonia in a pregnant recent immigrant from Ethiopia: think TB.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1