Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in subjects with a bicuspid aortic valve without significant valvular dysfunction.

Experimental & Clinical Cardiology Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Mehmet Demir
{"title":"Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in subjects with a bicuspid aortic valve without significant valvular dysfunction.","authors":"Mehmet Demir","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents the most common cardiac congenital malformation in adults. It is frequently associated with dilation, aneurysm and dissection of the ascending aorta.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in subjects with BAVs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five subjects with BAV (mean [± SD] age 25.9±5.7 years [range 17 to 36 years]; 18 male, 17 female) with either no valvular impairment or mild valvular impairment were recruited along with 30 control subjects (24.5±4.4 years of age [range 15 to 35 years]; 15 male, 15 female) who were matched for age, sex and body surface area. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function were evaluated using conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic parameters were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In subjects with BAVs, the ratio of mitral early diastolic velocity to late diastolic velocity was lower (0.95±0.4 versus 1.27±0.9; P=0.001), the ratio of mitral early diastolic velocity to myocardial early diastolic velocity was higher (10.1±3.2 versus 6.5±2.4; P=0.001) and the myocardial early diastolic velocity was lower (8.4±2.1 versus 15.3±3.6; P<0.001) compared with control subjects. In addition, the myocardial performance index was higher in subjects with BAVs than in control subjects (P=0.03). The left ventricular ejection fraction was also lower (53±11% versus 64±13%; P<0.001). No other statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups with regard to left ventricular systolic and diastolic parameters. In addition, the number of mitral valve prolapses and atrial septal aneurysms was higher in subjects with BAVs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BAVs may be associated with left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":54377,"journal":{"name":"Experimental & Clinical Cardiology","volume":"18 1","pages":"e1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3716490/pdf/ecc18e001.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental & Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents the most common cardiac congenital malformation in adults. It is frequently associated with dilation, aneurysm and dissection of the ascending aorta.

Objective: To evaluate left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in subjects with BAVs.

Methods: Thirty-five subjects with BAV (mean [± SD] age 25.9±5.7 years [range 17 to 36 years]; 18 male, 17 female) with either no valvular impairment or mild valvular impairment were recruited along with 30 control subjects (24.5±4.4 years of age [range 15 to 35 years]; 15 male, 15 female) who were matched for age, sex and body surface area. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function were evaluated using conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic parameters were compared between the two groups.

Results: In subjects with BAVs, the ratio of mitral early diastolic velocity to late diastolic velocity was lower (0.95±0.4 versus 1.27±0.9; P=0.001), the ratio of mitral early diastolic velocity to myocardial early diastolic velocity was higher (10.1±3.2 versus 6.5±2.4; P=0.001) and the myocardial early diastolic velocity was lower (8.4±2.1 versus 15.3±3.6; P<0.001) compared with control subjects. In addition, the myocardial performance index was higher in subjects with BAVs than in control subjects (P=0.03). The left ventricular ejection fraction was also lower (53±11% versus 64±13%; P<0.001). No other statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups with regard to left ventricular systolic and diastolic parameters. In addition, the number of mitral valve prolapses and atrial septal aneurysms was higher in subjects with BAVs.

Conclusion: BAVs may be associated with left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无明显瓣膜功能障碍的二尖瓣主动脉瓣患者左心室收缩和舒张功能。
背景:二尖瓣主动脉瓣(BAV)是成人最常见的先天性心脏畸形。它常伴有扩张、动脉瘤和升主动脉夹层。目的:评价房颤患者左心室收缩和舒张功能。方法:35例BAV患者(平均[±SD]年龄25.9±5.7岁[范围17 ~ 36岁];招募无瓣膜损伤或轻度瓣膜损伤的男性18例,女性17例,对照组30例(年龄24.5±4.4岁[15 ~ 35岁];15名男性,15名女性),年龄,性别和体表面积相匹配。采用常规超声心动图和组织多普勒超声心动图评价左心室收缩和舒张功能。比较两组左心室收缩和舒张参数。结果:在房颤患者中,二尖瓣舒张早期速度与舒张晚期速度之比较低(0.95±0.4 vs 1.27±0.9;P=0.001),二尖瓣早期舒张速度与心肌早期舒张速度之比更高(10.1±3.2 vs 6.5±2.4;P=0.001),心肌早期舒张速度较低(8.4±2.1∶15.3±3.6;结论:bav可能与左室收缩和舒张功能障碍有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental & Clinical Cardiology
Experimental & Clinical Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evidence-performance gap in primary care revisited in patients with diabetes Ischemic postconditioning decreases matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression during ischemia-reperfusion of myocardium in a rabbit model: A preliminary report. The effect of trans-resveratrol on platelet-neutrophil complex formation and neutrophil burst in hypercholesterolemic rats. A modified murine model for the study of reverse cardiac remodelling. Functions of cyclophilin A in atherosclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1