David Colquhoun, Diana Chirovsky, Valsilisa Sazonov, Yadong A Cui, Baishali Ambegaonkar
{"title":"Prevalence of mixed dyslipidemia among Australian patients undergoing lipid-modifying therapy.","authors":"David Colquhoun, Diana Chirovsky, Valsilisa Sazonov, Yadong A Cui, Baishali Ambegaonkar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have assessed the prevalence of mixed dyslipidemia (MD) and the effectiveness of lipid-modifying therapy (LMT) for the treatment of abnormal levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in Australian clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the prevalence of MD in Australian patients undergoing LMT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients 35 years of age and older undergoing LMT for ≥1 year were enrolled from nine general practice and cardiologist/endocrinologist outpatient clinics in Australia between April 2007 and May 2008. Lipid levels, including LDL-C, HDL-C and TG levels, were prospectively collected at the enrollment date and from patient records one year before LMT was initiated. Normal lipid levels were assessed according to Australian guidelines. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of normal lipid level attainment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 297 patients (mean age 60.1 years; 43% male), the prevalence of MD before LMT was 61%; 93% of patients had elevated LDL-C levels, 17% had low HDL-C levels and 62% had elevated TG levels. Following LMT (98.3% statins), 31% of patients had MD. The prevalence of elevated LDL-C levels, low HDL-C levels and elevated TG levels were 44%, 21% and 42%, respectively. Baseline lipid levels were significant predictors of attainment of normal LDL-C levels (OR 0.42 [95% CI 0.27 to 0.63]) and TG levels (OR 0.26 [95% CI 0.16 to 0.45]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among Australian patients primarily treated with statins, nearly one-third had MD despite LMT. LMT considerably improved LDL-C goal attainment; however, a large proportion of patients did not achieve normal HDL-C and TG levels. Patients may benefit from a more comprehensive approach to lipid management that treats all three lipid risk factors, as suggested in clinical guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":54377,"journal":{"name":"Experimental & Clinical Cardiology","volume":"18 1","pages":"e32-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3716499/pdf/ecc18e032.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental & Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Few studies have assessed the prevalence of mixed dyslipidemia (MD) and the effectiveness of lipid-modifying therapy (LMT) for the treatment of abnormal levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in Australian clinical practice.
Objective: To estimate the prevalence of MD in Australian patients undergoing LMT.
Methods: Patients 35 years of age and older undergoing LMT for ≥1 year were enrolled from nine general practice and cardiologist/endocrinologist outpatient clinics in Australia between April 2007 and May 2008. Lipid levels, including LDL-C, HDL-C and TG levels, were prospectively collected at the enrollment date and from patient records one year before LMT was initiated. Normal lipid levels were assessed according to Australian guidelines. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of normal lipid level attainment.
Results: Of 297 patients (mean age 60.1 years; 43% male), the prevalence of MD before LMT was 61%; 93% of patients had elevated LDL-C levels, 17% had low HDL-C levels and 62% had elevated TG levels. Following LMT (98.3% statins), 31% of patients had MD. The prevalence of elevated LDL-C levels, low HDL-C levels and elevated TG levels were 44%, 21% and 42%, respectively. Baseline lipid levels were significant predictors of attainment of normal LDL-C levels (OR 0.42 [95% CI 0.27 to 0.63]) and TG levels (OR 0.26 [95% CI 0.16 to 0.45]).
Conclusion: Among Australian patients primarily treated with statins, nearly one-third had MD despite LMT. LMT considerably improved LDL-C goal attainment; however, a large proportion of patients did not achieve normal HDL-C and TG levels. Patients may benefit from a more comprehensive approach to lipid management that treats all three lipid risk factors, as suggested in clinical guidelines.
背景:在澳大利亚临床实践中,很少有研究评估混合性血脂异常(MD)的患病率以及脂质修饰疗法(LMT)治疗低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、甘油三酯(TG)和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)异常水平的有效性。目的:评估澳大利亚行LMT患者MD的患病率。方法:从2007年4月至2008年5月在澳大利亚的9家全科医生和心脏病/内分泌科门诊诊所招募了年龄在35岁及以上接受LMT治疗≥1年的患者。脂质水平,包括LDL-C、HDL-C和TG水平,在入组之日和LMT开始前一年的患者记录中前瞻性地收集。正常血脂水平根据澳大利亚指南进行评估。采用多变量logistic回归评价正常脂质水平达到的预测因素。结果:297例患者(平均年龄60.1岁;43%男性),手术前MD患病率为61%;93%的患者LDL-C水平升高,17%的患者HDL-C水平较低,62%的患者TG水平升高。使用LMT(98.3%他汀类药物)后,31%的患者发生MD。LDL-C水平升高、HDL-C水平低和TG水平升高的患病率分别为44%、21%和42%。基线脂质水平是达到正常LDL-C水平(OR 0.42 [95% CI 0.27至0.63])和TG水平(OR 0.26 [95% CI 0.16至0.45])的重要预测因子。结论:在主要接受他汀类药物治疗的澳大利亚患者中,尽管进行了LMT,但仍有近三分之一的患者发生了MD。LMT显著提高LDL-C目标的实现;然而,很大一部分患者没有达到正常的HDL-C和TG水平。如临床指南所建议的,患者可能受益于更全面的脂质管理方法,治疗所有三种脂质危险因素。