Belarus: health system review.

Q1 Medicine Health systems in transition Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Erica Richardson, Irina Malakhova, Irina Novik, Andrei Famenka
{"title":"Belarus: health system review.","authors":"Erica Richardson,&nbsp;Irina Malakhova,&nbsp;Irina Novik,&nbsp;Andrei Famenka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This analysis of the Belarusian health system reviews the developments in organization and governance, health financing, healthcare provision, health reforms and health system performance since 2008. Despite considerable change since independence, Belarus retains a commitment to the principle of universal access to health care, provided free at the point of use through predominantly state-owned facilities, organized hierarchically on a territorial basis. Incremental change, rather than radical reform, has also been the hallmark of health-care policy, although capitation funding has been introduced in some areas and there have been consistent efforts to strengthen the role of primary care. Issues of high costs in the hospital sector and of weaknesses in public health demonstrate the necessity of moving forward with the reform programme. The focus for future reform is on strengthening preventive services and improving the quality and efficiency of specialist services. The key challenges in achieving this involve reducing excess hospital capacity, strengthening health-care management, use of evidence-based treatment and diagnostic procedures, and the development of more efficient financing mechanisms. Involving all stakeholders in the development of further reform planning and achieving consensus among them will be key to its success. </p>","PeriodicalId":38995,"journal":{"name":"Health systems in transition","volume":"15 5","pages":"1-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems in transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This analysis of the Belarusian health system reviews the developments in organization and governance, health financing, healthcare provision, health reforms and health system performance since 2008. Despite considerable change since independence, Belarus retains a commitment to the principle of universal access to health care, provided free at the point of use through predominantly state-owned facilities, organized hierarchically on a territorial basis. Incremental change, rather than radical reform, has also been the hallmark of health-care policy, although capitation funding has been introduced in some areas and there have been consistent efforts to strengthen the role of primary care. Issues of high costs in the hospital sector and of weaknesses in public health demonstrate the necessity of moving forward with the reform programme. The focus for future reform is on strengthening preventive services and improving the quality and efficiency of specialist services. The key challenges in achieving this involve reducing excess hospital capacity, strengthening health-care management, use of evidence-based treatment and diagnostic procedures, and the development of more efficient financing mechanisms. Involving all stakeholders in the development of further reform planning and achieving consensus among them will be key to its success.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白俄罗斯:卫生系统审查。
对白俄罗斯卫生系统的分析回顾了自2008年以来在组织和治理、卫生融资、医疗保健提供、卫生改革和卫生系统绩效方面的发展。尽管自独立以来发生了相当大的变化,但白俄罗斯仍然致力于普遍获得保健服务的原则,主要通过国有设施在使用点免费提供保健服务,这些设施在领土上按等级组织。保健政策的特点是渐进式的变化,而不是彻底的改革,尽管在一些地区实行了人头供资,并且一直在努力加强初级保健的作用。医院部门费用高和公共卫生薄弱等问题表明,有必要推进改革方案。今后改革的重点是加强预防服务和提高专家服务的质量和效率。实现这一目标的主要挑战包括减少医院的过剩能力,加强保健管理,使用循证治疗和诊断程序,以及制定更有效的筹资机制。让所有利益攸关方参与制定进一步的改革规划并在他们之间达成共识将是改革成功的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health systems in transition
Health systems in transition Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Denmark: Health System Review. Estonia: Health System Review. Sweden: Health System Review. France: Health System Review. Health and Care Data: Approaches to data linkage for evidence-informed policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1