Early results from an angiosome-directed open surgical technique for venous arterialization in patients with critical lower limb ischemia.

Q1 Health Professions Diabetic Foot & Ankle Pub Date : 2013-12-17 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.3402/dfa.v4i0.22713
Kim Houlind, Johnny Christensen, Christian Hallenberg, Jørn M Jepsen
{"title":"Early results from an angiosome-directed open surgical technique for venous arterialization in patients with critical lower limb ischemia.","authors":"Kim Houlind,&nbsp;Johnny Christensen,&nbsp;Christian Hallenberg,&nbsp;Jørn M Jepsen","doi":"10.3402/dfa.v4i0.22713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with critical lower limb ischemia without patent pedal arteries cannot be treated by the conventional arterial reconstruction. Venous arterialization has been suggested to improve limb salvage in this subgroup of patients but has not gained wide acceptance. We report our early experience after implementing deep and superficial venous arterialization of the lower limb.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten patients with critical ischemia and without crural or pedal arteries available for conventional bypass surgery or angioplasty were treated with distal venous arterialization. Inflow was from the most distal unobstructed segment. Run-off was the dorsal pedal venous arch (n=5), the dorsal pedal venous arch and a concomitant vein of the posterior tibial artery (n=3), or the dorsal pedal venous arch and a concomitant vein of the common plantar artery (n=2) depending on the location of the ischemic lesion. Venous valves were destroyed using antegrade valvulotomes, guide wires, knob needles, or retrograde valvulotomes via an extra incision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven of the operated limbs were amputated after 23 (1-256) days (median [range]). The main reasons for amputation were lack of healing of either the original wound, of incisional wounds on the foot, or persisting pain at rest. In three cases, the bypass was open at the time of amputation. Two patients experienced complete wound healing after 231 and 342 days, respectively. By the end of follow-up, the last patient was ambulating with slow wound healing but without pain 309 days after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Venous arterialization may be used as a treatment of otherwise unsalveable limbs. The success rate is, however, limited. Technical optimization of the technique is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":45385,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Foot & Ankle","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3402/dfa.v4i0.22713","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Foot & Ankle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3402/dfa.v4i0.22713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Background: Patients with critical lower limb ischemia without patent pedal arteries cannot be treated by the conventional arterial reconstruction. Venous arterialization has been suggested to improve limb salvage in this subgroup of patients but has not gained wide acceptance. We report our early experience after implementing deep and superficial venous arterialization of the lower limb.

Materials and methods: Ten patients with critical ischemia and without crural or pedal arteries available for conventional bypass surgery or angioplasty were treated with distal venous arterialization. Inflow was from the most distal unobstructed segment. Run-off was the dorsal pedal venous arch (n=5), the dorsal pedal venous arch and a concomitant vein of the posterior tibial artery (n=3), or the dorsal pedal venous arch and a concomitant vein of the common plantar artery (n=2) depending on the location of the ischemic lesion. Venous valves were destroyed using antegrade valvulotomes, guide wires, knob needles, or retrograde valvulotomes via an extra incision.

Results: Seven of the operated limbs were amputated after 23 (1-256) days (median [range]). The main reasons for amputation were lack of healing of either the original wound, of incisional wounds on the foot, or persisting pain at rest. In three cases, the bypass was open at the time of amputation. Two patients experienced complete wound healing after 231 and 342 days, respectively. By the end of follow-up, the last patient was ambulating with slow wound healing but without pain 309 days after surgery.

Conclusion: Venous arterialization may be used as a treatment of otherwise unsalveable limbs. The success rate is, however, limited. Technical optimization of the technique is warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期结果:血管体导向的开放性手术技术用于下肢严重缺血患者的静脉动脉化。
背景:无足动脉未闭的下肢严重缺血患者不能采用常规动脉重建治疗。静脉动脉化已被建议用于改善该亚组患者的肢体保留,但尚未得到广泛接受。我们报告实施下肢深静脉和浅静脉动脉化后的早期经验。材料和方法:采用远端静脉动脉化治疗10例严重缺血且无常规搭桥手术或血管成形术可用的脚动脉或足动脉。流入来自最远端通畅的节段。根据缺血病变的位置,依次为足背静脉弓(n=5)、足背静脉弓和胫后动脉的伴随静脉(n=3)或足背静脉弓和足底总动脉的伴随静脉(n=2)。采用顺行瓣膜切开术、导丝、旋钮针或经额外切口逆行瓣膜切开术破坏静脉瓣膜。结果:术后23(1 ~ 256)天(中位[范围]),7例截肢。截肢的主要原因是原发伤口、足部切口伤口未愈合或静息时持续疼痛。其中三例在截肢时,旁路是开放的。2例患者分别在231天和342天后伤口完全愈合。随访结束时,最后一名患者术后309天伤口愈合缓慢,无疼痛。结论:静脉动脉化可以作为治疗肢体残废的一种方法。然而,成功率是有限的。该技术的技术优化是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetic Foot & Ankle
Diabetic Foot & Ankle ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Limb salvage in diabetic patients with no-option critical limb ischemia: outcomes of a specialized center experience. Serum vitamin D and diabetic foot complications. Diabetes-related foot disorders among adult Ghanaians. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the human recombinant epidermal growth factor in the management of patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetic foot ulcer outcomes from a podiatry led tertiary service in Kuwait.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1